- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 19,246
- Reaction score
- 127,084
I agree about the harmful comments that put children in a box according to gender but I'm not sure all that will stop just because people don't know. It just takes a different form. Instead of "You can't do that because you're a girl" the child will have people speculating, "Oh, I think she's a girl because boys don't do that" and "It must be a boy because that's a boyish quality."
People want to assign the child to some category if not for any other reason because the English language categorizes people in two slots. They want to know whether to use he/she/him/her/his/hers/himself/herself when referring to the child because there is no easy way around non-gender neutral personal pronouns all the time. Not every language makes that distinction but I wonder how the family keeps from slipping and revealing the secret with their pronouns. It's usually so automatic.
Which is why I wonder if the baby is a girl since the mother says she calls the baby "she" and imagines it's with s in brackets. If it's really a boy it would be cognitively more demanding to always remember the (s), it would be more confusing for the baby who would learn that all the other people called "her" in "her" environment are females, and I think a lot of people would find it deceptive as well, since they can't hear the imagined brackets.
From the link in the opening post:
Wonder how gender- neutral parenting parents in languages with more gender distinctions work this out... Like French, Spanish or Italian where you must choose either a feminine or a masculine version of the adjectives you use to refer to the child, or some languages in which even the verb changes according to gender.
People want to assign the child to some category if not for any other reason because the English language categorizes people in two slots. They want to know whether to use he/she/him/her/his/hers/himself/herself when referring to the child because there is no easy way around non-gender neutral personal pronouns all the time. Not every language makes that distinction but I wonder how the family keeps from slipping and revealing the secret with their pronouns. It's usually so automatic.
Which is why I wonder if the baby is a girl since the mother says she calls the baby "she" and imagines it's with s in brackets. If it's really a boy it would be cognitively more demanding to always remember the (s), it would be more confusing for the baby who would learn that all the other people called "her" in "her" environment are females, and I think a lot of people would find it deceptive as well, since they can't hear the imagined brackets.
From the link in the opening post:
There are questions about which bathroom Storm will use, but that is a couple of years off. Then there is the “tyranny of pronouns,” as they call it. They considered referring to Storm as “Z”. Witterick now calls the baby she, imagining the “s” in brackets.
Wonder how gender- neutral parenting parents in languages with more gender distinctions work this out... Like French, Spanish or Italian where you must choose either a feminine or a masculine version of the adjectives you use to refer to the child, or some languages in which even the verb changes according to gender.