People Magazine - Caylee Anthony's Family Secrets

[bunnyphoenix1]

Bad, bad Bunny! LOL

LOL! I use the "sample" copy of course.

 

[cocoamom]

isn't Cindy writing a book anyway? who cares if someone scoops her? I don't.

:clap::clap::clap:

 

[MD MOMMY]

Before anyone suggests that the fight between GA & his dad was b/c GA found out he wasn't inheriting his father's business, I'd like to let you know that I beg to differ b/c apparently they had an on again - off again relationship throughout most or all of GA's life. So, again, I wonder why this source is informing the world of such indiscretions at a point when no sane person would be able to handle it - let alone somebody in the hospital trying to pick up the pieces!

I worked for a magazine, to remain annonymous...no it was NOT people. This article has probably been in the works for several WEEKS, possibly even months. I honestly don't think it was placed into publication at the precise time GA is in the hospital. Heck, the proofing/editing and printing stage takes weeks in and of itself. Not to mention, who knows when the mysterious source went to the mag to begin with. It's all a process and I think the timing is not great, but I don't think they said "hey he's in the hospital, lets release the article to get him while he's down". Unfortunately everyone is free game in the eyes of the media, it's America. Unfortunately the media isn't only there when the A's want to vent or bad mouth someone. Media is a two way street, and if you can't take the heat then you need NOT be in the kitchen. JMO.

 

[cocoamom]

The "source" appears to be telling a side of the truth which was conveniently left out of the many, many times that Cindy and George decided to grace themselves on every television show and even in the same magazine to lie and further their Alive Caylee BS (imo)...yet the source is at fault in someway? Why on earth should this be considered a bad thing? The truth is why we are all here.

Sometimes, the truth hurts...but there is a dead two year old child and no one is taking responsibility for her murder. Getting to the bottom of this family is the only way to get at the truth, imo. They could have put a stop to so many things from the beginning by telling it themselves instead of other people having to dig into their personal lives to find it. Lying or hiding anything in this case was a mistake on their part and has only added to their burdens.

If it is a family member, they should be commended for stepping forward to tell it like it is and bring to light the issues which could have played into Caylee's murder. It is about time that someone tells the truth and stops painting the picture of a wholesome, healthy all American family that does not exist, imo. Bravo!!

SS! POST OF THE DAY!! :clap::clap::woohoo:

 

[Who_What_When]

Respectfully bolded by me. I think this family's fear of embarrassment plays a very large part in this crime to begin with. I never can seem to get why people are so afraid of being embarrassed about anything?! It's not like every other human on the planet hasn't had something negative happen. What's the big deal? I guess I just never really cared what other people think of me - like me or don't - whatever (shrugs). To each his own...we all have the right to our feelings and opinions. :blowkiss:

One of my favorite sayings is "It is impossible to embarrass other people, you can only embarrass yourself." Don't know who said it though...

Maybe "R" is tired of the secrecy in the family and just wants to be known as one of the few family members willing to stand up, speak out and tell the truth! Has anyone heard of him profiting from this? Any proof? Maybe he DID go freely. It's not like he chose a rag mag, People is pretty up there as far as the gossips go - better than most! IMO

Bolded by me.

I think this is a whole lot different than having to care about what people think about someone. I could care less what the people around me think (except my family), however I would never want my life in the media. Why would anyone want that? Nothing you do is private and everything you say can be taken out of context. Just look at what all the people on the internet do with this information. Look at all the innocent people who have been hurt or ruin by information given to the media. You'd want that? I for sure wouldn't, but like you said we have the right to our own feelings and opinions.

 

[cocoamom]

Maybe it's the guy who came to dinner that they talked about in the latest released jail interview! LOL --

 

[CarolineJ]

I do not believe that Cindy's brother, Rick, is People magazine's source. IMO if it was him he would not have been anonymous. He seems like pretty much of a stand up guy and I think he would stand by his statements. He has been on forums and he has never said that Cindy talked to George in that manner. We're blaming him for something that he likely did not do.

 

[zadari]

He did. He also advised NG. How do you know this mag is paying him?

well mabey i am wrong ? but isnt this the same thing cindy and george did? everyonewrote they were being paid ,it was stated on here millions of times they were making blood money from interviews .(was this proven for a fact)?.so i assumed that whoever told this story is too .. so if im wrong about the money thing fine im wrong then.. i guess i just dont see why anyone should be making a profit off of a murdered baby ..no matter what thier reasoning is unless its people hired to defend casey or to prosecute her .(law enforcement ect ect) and imho this story should be told in court not a mag it could very well help with the trial

 

[cajun]

Bolded by me. To me, this sounds like it's coming from one or more of his friends, not family members on either side.

Could be, Friday. I did add on the friends to my saying it was probably his family when I was responding to someone about my post. I think it's more of someone who is an alliance(don't know if that would be a correct word or not) of George.

 

[cajun]

Maybe we should wait until we read the actual article. It will be a few days before I can get my hands on it tho. I am not skating to the store to buy one! LOL

Our skating around is over and done with and I have to go to Wally World tomorrow so if my feeble brain can remember I will grab a copy.

 

[radio]

I don't want to take their civil rights away, but these rights come with consequences and responsibilities. IMHO

Our civil rights are not prefaced by behavior.

 

[zadari]

hey, he might as well Cindy is.

this is my point .. none of them should be.. not friends or family esp now no i dont know for an absolute fact that this person got paid .. but when ga and ca did people interview i remember reading how everyone was angry because they were making blood money off of caylee ..why cant someone tell the true story for free ? why is this even in people mag .it should be coming out at the trial .kwim?

 

[SeriouslySearching]

No. The truth should not have to wait on any trial to come out! The truth should have come out right after the words, "31 days". There is never a good reason to put the truth off until trial!! GRRRRR!

For that matter...since when CAN the real truth be told at trial?! It isn't as simple as that anymore.

 

[zadari]

No. The truth should not have to wait on any trial to come out! The truth should have come out right after the words, "31 days". There is never a good reason to put the truth off until trial!! GRRRRR!

how do we know its the truth ? if they lie on the witness stand its pergery and this is just my opinion .. people dont have to get upset at me over it . im simply trying to explain why i feel the way i do .. there is no right or wrong here .

 

[SeriouslySearching]

how do we know its the truth ? if they lie on the witness stand its pergery

Purgery is always substantiated by proof. We will know eventually what is considered the truth by the evidence.

We know that LE will tell the truth. The evidence will tell the truth to back up what LE and witnesses state tho. It all comes down to proof.

The whole trial would be avoided if someone simply told the absolute truth now tho. It would be OVER. Someone could end this fiasco...immediately.

 

[zadari]

Purgery is always substantiated by proof. We will know eventually what is considered the truth by the evidence.

We know that LE will tell the truth. The evidence will tell the truth to back up what LE and witnesses state tho. It all comes down to proof.

i know that and yeah the truth shouldve been told from the start .but so many lies from so many people have been spewed out .. who does one believe now ? that is why im gonna wait for the trial because there will be proof in what is said

 

[gitana1]

Personally, I think he is the only one that we've seen who seems to accept what happened in his family except maybe for his Mom, however I don't think he should have gone online talking about everything to strangers. To me, it doesn't make him a good guy and instead makes him seem like he wants the publicity. If this was my family I would never air my dirty laundry on the web. JMO.

Double Ditto.

 

[SeriouslySearching]

I am sorry...didn't mean to be snarky about it.

People are judging the person coming forward to People magazine with what appears to be some truth in this situation. Every time someone steps forward to do this...they are blasted for talking about the A fam even if they are telling it like it is or the way they perceive it. Then you have the A fam who appear not to understand the difference between the truth and a lie in any given circumstance yet people aren't judging them accordingly for some reason. Excuses for not telling the truth do not negate the fact they have lied, imo.

 

[zadari]

I am sorry...didn't mean to be snarky about it.

People are judging the person coming forward to People magazine with what appears to be some truth in this situation. Every time someone steps forward to do this...they are blasted for talking about the A fam even if they are telling it like it is or the way they perceive it. Then you have the A fam who appear not to understand the difference between the truth and a lie in any given circumstance yet people aren't judging them accordingly for some reason. Excuses for not telling the truth do not negate the fact they have lied.

i know it ..

 

[sweetmop]

I watched Nancy Grace's program a 2nd time. It occurred to me that the author of the article on there quoted the Anthony's attorney many times over, as well as their next door neighbor.
It sort of sounds like the source for his information came mostly from these two people.

Just thinking.