I disagree with people saying it is better for the families, they can move on now, the DP trial and appeals would be a big burden on the taxpayers etc.
Who am I to determine what is best for the victims, how they can or should move on, what is worth spending the public funds on. It is easier to say from the outside looking in that the trial would be heartbreaking for the families, that it is better for them to not go through a long trial, but they are the victims and they say it is important for them to see that he is tried in open court before a jury.
If there is death penalty and if the laws state that in the case of a death sentence, and there are automatic appeals and funding for the appeals to make sure all the I's are dotted an T's are crossed, then I cannot tell the families it is better this way for them, that it won't be too much of a burden on the taxpayer this way. It would feel like a slap on the face.
And what's the damn rush that they do not even properly consult with the victims about this beforehand? Is the prosecution afraid that he will change his mind and not plead guilty? They are supposed to be ready for trial no matter what.
I hope the families can have at least a bit of a closure and some healing during sentencing and I surely hope that they make it a condition of the plea deal that he truthfully tell in open court what he did. I am not holding my breath though. If the prosecution is handling the victims like this, I doubt they will care about making him tell exactly what he did truthfully as part of the plea deal.
Off my soap box now.