POI - Dale Golder - #1

[Kimster]

I'm confused. (Pretend you are all shocked!)

Is this person you are sleuthing someone who knows DG? Cuz this is the DG thread?

 

[momtective]

I'm confused. (Pretend you are all shocked!)

Is this person you are sleuthing someone who knows DG? Cuz this is the DG thread?

Correct you are Kimster. Sorry for the O/T it's was a waste of time anyway.:blowkiss:

 

[eyes4crime]

I'm confused. (Pretend you are all shocked!)

Is this person you are sleuthing someone who knows DG? Cuz this is the DG thread?

Hi Kimster - Maybe momtective thought this guy had sex offenses. I'm not sure why she put the name out there...no sex offenses, just citations. 5 of them. Maybe they were given out in different states, but the courts in Ca. took care of the fines or whatever.

 

[Kimster]

After reading that SW, I really think the answers are going to be with DG. Too many coinky doinks there.

Remember how we had KC's childhood friend telling us about the area that Caylee was found WAY before she was found? Can we find out where DG's friends used to hang out? Have all those areas been searched?

 

[fleececreations]

did someone post a link to a new thread for the search center on here?

 

[Kimster]

did someone post a link to a new thread for the search center on here?

No, it was on the general discussion thread. I think you found it, tho.

 

[Jules71]

I hope you all won't think I am being annoying, but I will ask again. Do we know who it was who sent Lindsey's brother home after the bike incident? Was it WW?

 

[LookN4Lindsey]

I hope you all won't think I am being annoying, but I will ask again. Do we know who it was who sent Lindsey's brother home after the bike incident? Was it WW?

No, it was not WW, but the persons name who sent JB home was not released yet so I don't believe that we can post it here.

 

[Jules71]

No, it was not WW, but the persons name who sent JB and LB home was not released yet so I don't believe that we can post it here.

Ok thank you!! So then, we don't think this person is responsible in any way then?

 

[Knox]

Hi Kimster - Maybe momtective thought this guy had sex offenses. I'm not sure why she put the name out there...no sex offenses, just citations. 5 of them. Maybe they were given out in different states, but the courts in Ca. took care of the fines or whatever.

She's sleuthing him because he is a tenant on the property adjacent to the G family property and needs to be looked at.

 

[Jules71]

She's sleuthing him because he is a tenant on the property adjacent to the G family property and needs to be looked at.

In whitepages he has the same address as TG and the property that was searched. He also came up with an address closer in town and a business.

 

[Knox]

That's odd Jules, did we have photo's of that property? I'm still a little confused, one of the houses, specifically the run-down one with boarded up windows and a tarp on the roof looked abandoned. Which property was that?

 

[Jules71]

That's odd Jules, did we have photo's of that property? I'm still a little confused, one of the houses, specifically the run-down one with boarded up windows and a tarp on the roof looked abandoned. Which property was that?

185 SAND CREEK RD is the one that is vacant and has a shop on it.

 

[Jules71]

Just thinking then, that the BB person could be the 4th adult in the house on Foreman Rd.

 

[LadyL]

No, he is not named in media as being involved in the case so cannot post the myspace. Just another nut job who appears to be reading the blogs and doing take-offs of other peoples work.

Not worth getting in trouble on WS by posting the MS page.

ok, I have a hypothetical question :innocent:

say there was a person posting all over the internet about cases involving missing/exploited children

& it turned out that person is a convicted S.O.

since I'm fairly new to this, is it common in sleuthing to discover such whackos?

'cause if so, I think I already need a break :yuck:

 

[kageykaren]

Thank you! I sure hope you don't think I was questioning your integrity, am so sorry if it came across that way. I just wondered where it came from, that's all. Thanks for the info!

I know you didn't mean that. Sometimes when I post and don't explain myself clearly someone always needs me to explain, so I thought I would nip any suspicions about me, my post, and belief system to avoid conflict and confusion. :blowkiss:

 

[eyes4crime]

185 SAND CREEK RD is the one that is vacant and has a shop on it.

when I search that address I get DON G. He is everywhere! :waitasec:

 

[not_my_kids]

I think the other poster, the one that is trying too hard to be cryptic is showing us how not to advertise. (Fail, dude.) If you read all the hundreds odd postings this person has up all over, on all different sites about all different cases, it looks like someone that isn't quite smart enough to program a bot, attempting bot speak.

That's just what it looks like to me. I agree with the wackjob analysis. (I'm pretty sure we can say wackjob.)

 

[Jules71]

Ok, I remember seeing that shop. What about this one right next to the vacant house?

 

[Jules71]

What is this on the right side of the property at 173 Sand Creek Rd - a water tower?