Peter Brendt
New Member
Peter, you are right, if LE arrived at the gate house and GC let them in at 5:32AM, no way could have MP abducted SG.
However in Newsday it was written .....Coletti said an officer from the
police marine unit arrived about 30 minutes after he called 911.
Assuming GC is telling the truth; for the police to arrive when you say they did GC's 911 call would have to taken place around 5:00am, but as you state that is not possible because GC had not met SG at that time.
Again we have no exact time of events. It is useless to argue what or what could not have taken place unless the times are exact.
If LE arrived at Oak Beach at 5:32am, no way could MP abduct SG.
If LE arrived at Oak beach at 6:07am, MP could have abducted SG
And we know because GC said he waited about a half an hour for LE, there is no way LE could have arrived at 5:32am.
So Peter are you saying that GC called 911 about 5:02 am, (before he met SG), went directly to the gate house, waited about a half an hour and let LE in at 5:32am? I do not think so.
Nice, and non-cynical, and I apologise if in the past I have not been.
WINDSOR
MOO
Nope, I'm saying GC called after 5:14 (the end of SG's call. JR said, she can be heard on the tape running, the protocol of dispatch should be the more accurate time than GC's estimation).
There should be at least three protocol books that would all to be forged. The one of the officer, dispatch and the one of the shift leader at dispatch (remember, there was discussion about pinging her cell because SG couldn't say where she was).
So ... are you saying Dormer or officers forged all those protocol books? It means you accuse them of committing a serious crime. Are you? Because if not, we have to assume, those times are the correct ones.
