Poll: Did Darlie Routier murder her children?

Did Darlie do it?

  • Yes ~ she is on Death Row where she belongs

    Votes: 234 57.2%
  • No ~ there was an intruder

    Votes: 59 14.4%
  • Don't know

    Votes: 116 28.4%

  • Total voters
    409
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #401
Goody said:
If you are not Jeffrey, how could we have had many discussions on this this? Huh, Jeffie, huh?

Thanks for the reminder of this testimony. Contrary to your encyclopedic mind, Goody is not a walking steno pad. Completely forgot about it,


I think there is a lot you have forgotten. But that doesn't stop your opinions.

but I got the gist of it down when I said supporters think one could walk a specific path to avoid setting the motion detector off.

No Goody. It was the police conducting a test for this very purpose who decided that the light could not be activated by walking or running from the window to the gate. They tried it several times and the llight just never triggered. Why would you want to negate their work and their discovery and put it out that it was something that supporters think? I bet you didn't even read the testimony after I hunted it up for beesy and copied it here did you?

arrived on the scene.


You and Beesy might make a good match, but if it gets ugly y'all will have to take it to GAC cause Jeana don't allow no pistol whipping round here.

Pistol whipping Goody? I don't think beesy and I will be engaging in anything so amusing for you. So sorry.
 
  • #402
Goody said:
If you are not Jeffrey, how could we have had many discussions on this this? Huh, Jeffie, huh?

Thanks for the reminder of this testimony. Contrary to your encyclopedic mind, Goody is not a walking steno pad. Completely forgot about it, but I got the gist of it down when I said supporters think one could walk a specific path to avoid setting the motion detector off. Again this is not as important as it could be if the light had been on when police arrived on the scene.

You and Beesy might make a good match, but if it gets ugly y'all will have to take it to GAC cause Jeana don't allow no pistol whipping round here
Hey! Don't set up a fight for me. You ain't my manager and I ain't not boxer.
 
  • #403
SnootyVixen said:
Pistol whipping Goody? I don't think beesy and I will be engaging in anything so amusing for you. So sorry.
Nope I ain't into that
I think there is a lot you have forgotten. But that doesn't stop your opinions

I think that's uncalled for. Goody readily admits when she's wrong, but she's usually right. We all express opinions on here.
No Goody. It was the police conducting a test for this very purpose who decided that the light could not be activated by walking or running from the window to the gate. They tried it several times and the llight just never triggered. Why would you want to negate their work and their discovery and put it out that it was something that supporters think? I bet you didn't even read the testimony after I hunted it up for beesy and copied it here did you

Thank you for finding that. I get a little tired of researching things and then not getting any help in return.
That is not what he said. But the supporters say that's what he said. They ran all around the yard, sometimes it triggered and sometimes it didn't. We do know one thing, it wasn't on when they first searched the yard. The quickest path to the gate would have taken an intruder through that mulch which was not messed up. If he took the easiest path then the mulch should have been disturbed. If he took another, most likely he'd have triggered the light.
None of this can eliminate all of the blood evidence. And that the gate was latched. I think the idea that someone jumped over that fence is BS
 
  • #404
beesy said:
Hey! Don't set up a fight for me. You ain't my manager and I ain't not boxer.
You ain't not a boxer, eh? :waitasec: Don't worry. I don't do bookings anymore. hahahhahahha. You and Jeffie will find your way to the ring soon enough without my help.
 
  • #405
beesy said:
That is not what he said. But the supporters say that's what he said. They ran all around the yard, sometimes it triggered and sometimes it didn't. We do know one thing, it wasn't on when they first searched the yard. The quickest path to the gate would have taken an intruder through that mulch which was not messed up. If he took the easiest path then the mulch should have been disturbed. If he took another, most likely he'd have triggered the light.
None of this can eliminate all of the blood evidence. And that the gate was latched. I think the idea that someone jumped over that fence is BS
I totally agree, bees. Nor did a fleeing intruder stop to lift that gate up to place it in the correct position to latch before running to his getaway car. :doh: Jeff doesn't work with common sense approaches. He prefers any theory that will offer a little loop hole for doubt. The fact that he thinks anyone could convince a jury that these theories are a likely alternative to what police say happened is sillier than the theory in the first place. But that is Jeff in full living color. :blowkiss:
 
  • #406
beesy said:
Nope I ain't into that

I think that's uncalled for. Goody readily admits when she's wrong, but she's usually right. We all express opinions on here.

Thank you for finding that. I get a little tired of researching things and then not getting any help in return.
That is not what he said. But the supporters say that's what he said. They ran all around the yard, sometimes it triggered and sometimes it didn't. We do know one thing, it wasn't on when they first searched the yard. The quickest path to the gate would have taken an intruder through that mulch which was not messed up. If he took the easiest path then the mulch should have been disturbed. If he took another, most likely he'd have triggered the light.
None of this can eliminate all of the blood evidence. And that the gate was latched. I think the idea that someone jumped over that fence is BS

Geez. You are certainly right where you belong. Can't even read the damn testimony and get it straight. I think I'm gonna have to take a wee break from you folks. You wear a person down.
 
  • #407
beesy said:
Nope I ain't into that

I think that's uncalled for. Goody readily admits when she's wrong, but she's usually right. We all express opinions on here.

Thank you for finding that. I get a little tired of researching things and then not getting any help in return.
That is not what he said. But the supporters say that's what he said. They ran all around the yard, sometimes it triggered and sometimes it didn't. We do know one thing, it wasn't on when they first searched the yard. The quickest path to the gate would have taken an intruder through that mulch which was not messed up. If he took the easiest path then the mulch should have been disturbed. If he took another, most likely he'd have triggered the light.
None of this can eliminate all of the blood evidence. And that the gate was latched. I think the idea that someone jumped over that fence is BS

If you don't mind would you point out where in the testimony he said that they ran all around in the yard and sometimes they triggered it and sometimes they didn't. Let me ask you another question. Do you really want to know the truth about this matter or not? Sometimes I can't tell with you.
Did you even read the part where he said that he had to walk to the door of the spa before he triggered it? And that the spa is on the opposite side of the yard from the garage? I don't think he said that. I think you would have to know the layout of the yard. Do you? If you don't there are some photos in MTJD. Are you saying that he ran from the window to the door of the spa and then to turned around and ran back to the gate? That's the only way to turn that motion detector on. Can't you read this kind of testimony and get the facts that they are saying out of all the verbiage? You have to be able to do that to understand any testimony. There's more testimony about this. Are you even interested enough to find it for yourself? I find that I just don't really care that much what you think about this case. I know that your foundation for making your judgements is faulty because of where you got your information but that's your problem and not mine. So I shall butt out.
 
  • #408
Goody said:
If you are not Jeffrey, how could we have had many discussions on this this? Huh, Jeffie, huh?

Thanks for the reminder of this testimony. Contrary to your encyclopedic mind, Goody is not a walking steno pad. Completely forgot about it, but I got the gist of it down when I said supporters think one could walk a specific path to avoid setting the motion detector off. Again this is not as important as it could be if the light had been on when police arrived on the scene.

You and Beesy might make a good match, but if it gets ugly y'all will have to take it to GAC cause Jeana don't allow no pistol whipping round here.
Snoots has already said he was Jeff. When I asked him why he lied...he replied that he lied because he didn't know how he would be treated. Can't get out of it snoots.....it is all here.:loser:
 
  • #409
SnootyVixen said:
Geez. You are certainly right where you belong. Can't even read the damn testimony and get it straight. I think I'm gonna have to take a wee break from you folks. You wear a person down.
Works for me snoots/jeff. By the way..keep you :liar: straight. You already admitted to being jeff.
 
  • #410
SnootyVixen said:
If you don't mind would you point out where in the testimony he said that they ran all around in the yard and sometimes they triggered it and sometimes they didn't. Let me ask you another question. Do you really want to know the truth about this matter or not? Sometimes I can't tell with you.
Did you even read the part where he said that he had to walk to the door of the spa before he triggered it? And that the spa is on the opposite side of the yard from the garage? I don't think he said that. I think you would have to know the layout of the yard. Do you? If you don't there are some photos in MTJD. Are you saying that he ran from the window to the door of the spa and then to turned around and ran back to the gate? That's the only way to turn that motion detector on. Can't you read this kind of testimony and get the facts that they are saying out of all the verbiage? You have to be able to do that to understand any testimony. There's more testimony about this. Are you even interested enough to find it for yourself? I find that I just don't really care that much what you think about this case. I know that your foundation for making your judgements is faulty because of where you got your information but that's your problem and not mine. So I shall butt out.
It is not like we are talking about a 40 acre field here. The lots in that subd. are quite small and the back yard has all sorts of things, including a hot tub and lean-to (or cabanna if you prefer) and a pond with a monument to a dead cat. There was not many feet to walk in there no matter which direction you went. So when you say they had to walk all the way to the cabanna door, just how many feet from the sidewalk are you talking about?
 
  • #411
deandaniellws said:
Snoots has already said he was Jeff. When I asked him why he lied...he replied that he lied because he didn't know how he would be treated. Can't get out of it snoots.....it is all here.:loser:
Jeff used to call me pompous all the time. And that was one of his nicer endearments. So far snoots has called me pompous two or three times. And shoot, just days ago we were great friends. I am so disappointed.
 
  • #412
Goody said:
Jeff used to call me pompous all the time. And that was one of his nicer endearments. So far snoots has called me pompous two or three times. And shoot, just days ago we were great friends. I am so disappointed.
I have no use for someone who :liar: and who kills chickens for voodoo. :sick:
 
  • #413
deandaniellws said:
I have no use for someone who :liar: and who kills chickens for voodoo. :sick:
O, gawd, not another curse on goody. :chicken: I guess I will just have to sic God's angels on him. No power greater than that.
 
  • #414
Goody said:
It is not like we are talking about a 40 acre field here. The lots in that subd. are quite small and the back yard has all sorts of things, including a hot tub and lean-to (or cabanna if you prefer) and a pond with a monument to a dead cat. There was not many feet to walk in there no matter which direction you went. So when you say they had to walk all the way to the cabanna door, just how many feet from the sidewalk are you talking about?

What a lot of babble. Look at the diagram. Look at the photos. You can see the back yard. You can see the walks. what's so difficult about that. Why do I have to do it for you?
 
  • #415
Goody said:
It is not like we are talking about a 40 acre field here. The lots in that subd. are quite small and the back yard has all sorts of things, including a hot tub and lean-to (or cabanna if you prefer) and a pond with a monument to a dead cat. There was not many feet to walk in there no matter which direction you went. So when you say they had to walk all the way to the cabanna door, just how many feet from the sidewalk are you talking about?


And just in case you mistakedly thought I was posting to you when I wrote my post, I wasn't. I was talking to beesy.
 
  • #416
deandaniellws said:
Snoots has already said he was Jeff. When I asked him why he lied...he replied that he lied because he didn't know how he would be treated. Can't get out of it snoots.....it is all here.:loser:

You bunch are such a hoot.
 
  • #417
Goody said:
Jeff used to call me pompous all the time. And that was one of his nicer endearments. So far snoots has called me pompous two or three times. And shoot, just days ago we were great friends. I am so disappointed.

I don't recall your ever being friends with Jeff.
 
  • #418
Goody said:
Jeff used to call me pompous all the time. And that was one of his nicer endearments. So far snoots has called me pompous two or three times. And shoot, just days ago we were great friends. I am so disappointed.

Maybe it's time you looked into whether or not you're pompous.
 
  • #419
Goody said:
O, gawd, not another curse on goody. :chicken: I guess I will just have to sic God's angels on him. No power greater than that.

Goody, trust me, everything's not always about you.
 
  • #420
SnootyVixen said:
And just in case you mistakedly thought I was posting to you when I wrote my post, I wasn't. I was talking to beesy.
Doesn't make any difference who you were talking to...you are still wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
110
Guests online
3,662
Total visitors
3,772

Forum statistics

Threads
632,667
Messages
18,630,014
Members
243,241
Latest member
Kieiru
Back
Top