My thoughts exactly. I can't even
think of how the duct tape was used.
She's such a liar, it's difficult to imagine she'd trust anyone, but sometimes I think she must have trusted someone along the way. But I still voted "no accomplice", although I'm probably wrong. Evidence appears to point to assistance.
I adamantly believe she killed the innocent child all by herself, and if someone else gave help, it was after the fact. Got that?

Accidental? No way. If she was drugging the child, that's no accident, even if she didn't attend to "kill" her, just doing the horrid deed is criminal enough, imo.
I can't figure out who would help her considering this was about a little child. Is Casey more important then the baby?

Cindy certainly took Casey's side over Caylee's, so I guess it's not so out there with those people. I believe the "alleged" accomplice was "close to home".