Polygraph Poll

Would you take the polygraph?

  • I would take it without hesitation! Show me the chair, and find the child!

    Votes: 268 86.7%
  • I would take it,but think they may frame me!

    Votes: 12 3.9%
  • I would only take it, If I could get my own tester.

    Votes: 16 5.2%
  • I would never take one. The FBI only makes up the results they want.

    Votes: 13 4.2%

  • Total voters
    309
  • Poll closed .
  • #21
I voted I would take, with own tester. I know someone that got in trouble, and wanted to prove that it was self defense on the charges. He got a private investigator and they did an independent poly and submitted it during trial. With witnesses and proven guilt of the person that he was involved with on the battery charges, and we believe the poly, he was found not guilty after 2-1/2 hours of deliberation.
 
  • #22
I have not spoken my opinion, because I wanted unbiased opinions before I stated mine. I have nieces and nephews. I love them very much. I have a brother and sister and even I don't always understand them, I love them.
I have watched Marc Klaas over the years, talking about when his daughter was missing he insisted they do a lie detector on him so they could move on to someone else. He did not want them for one moment wasting anymore time on him than necessary. It is unfortunate that when children are kidnapped, family should be the first people they look at, because they are the ones most likely to take the child. (It is like that horrible fact that if a woman is killed while pregnant, the person most likely to kill her and the child, statistically is the father of the child. How sick is that?)
I would immediately take the test. I would not get a lawyer. The only way I would get a lawyer is if I started to get accused of something I did not do.
Now this is only for me, and how I think. I realise that people have different life experiences, and viewpoints. What is right for me and my conscious, I would never suggest is the right thing for anyone else.
 
  • #23
I am not a person who lies, but I have always wondered if I would show up as lying due to nerves... I would love to have the opportunity to take one when not charged with anything just to satisfy my curiosity on that.
 
  • #24
If you had nothing to hide why not take one ?
 
  • #25
  • #26
I would have let them know that there was no need for me to take it. The princess and I would just need a few minutes of quiet time. Then I would have gone out and told LE where my grandchild/niece was. I still think Lee (Hi Lee) or the gp's need to take care of buisiness. This baby that loved them is counting on them.
 
  • #27
Not a chance in heck would I take one.
 
  • #28
If you had nothing to hide why not take one ?
because I have already flunked some in a study group and I was being honest!They weren't even subjective questions; things like my name and birthdate.It was conducted properly.
 
  • #29
Because it is SCIENTIFCALLY proven they are BS.

They have been proven unreliable under some circumstance. The last rating I heard was 97%(still you know about ratings, they are only as good as the person giving them). They do have problems. If you test someone who is delusional, believing their own lies, they will pass. If you test someone who has forgotten things, or has mentally buried things, then they will more than likely pass the test. If you happen to be a CIA agent, someone who has been trained to fool the machine(which is harder now than 20 years ago, but some people can do, especially if the have NO doubts that they can). or if they don't believe it will work, their breathing, sweating, and other signs may not vary enough to get an answer.
As for being nervous about a test throwing it off, don't worry about that. Everyone normal will be worried about a polygraph test. You will be ask quite a few questions, which the examiner knows are true or false, and a few he/she is not sure of, just to help gauge the test. Once they get a baseline for you, you will be just as nervous for the true questions as well as the lies, and the lies will show up beyond nervousness.
The problem (If I remember this lecture from UNC) is when they ask you a question like, "Are you guilty of the murder of Adam Bell?" You answer no, because you did not kill him but you remember not warning him about Steve being angry at him and finding out about his affair with Steve's wife. You feel guilty about the death, and the test shows an inconclusive result. If you feel guilty enough it will show a deceptive answer. A deceptive answer does not mean to the FBI(even though they may tell you different to squeeze the "truth" out of you) that you lied, but that you have something going on emotionally with that answer.
These tests are not perfect, and cannot be used in a court of law, but can be a tool for LE to help them know where to search, and where not to search.
 
  • #30
  • #31
I voted yes based on the question with this particular scenerio, otherwise I would not.

I would do ANYTHING to find my children, grandson or loved ones however I have taken one before and FAILED big time, was nervous yet told the truth on a question and they though I lied.

PS Was for a job and question was do you have stable childcare, which I did yet I hated leaving him for so many hours, young Mom at the time.
 
  • #32
I do not trust them. If you have any doubt in your mind, when asked a specific question -you look to be lying. also, there are liars who pass detectors. and those with nervous disorders can fail them. LE gave a pedophile (that molested a relative of mine)a lie detector test. he passed and passed and passed... he went on to abuse another child for six years.
 
  • #33
"[Polygraph screening] is completely without any theoretical foundation and has absolutely no validity...the diagnostic value of this type of testing is no more than that of astrology or tea-leaf reading."

Former Supervisory Special Agent
Dr. Drew C. Richardson,
FBI Laboratory Division



"Polygraph is more art than science, and unless an admission is obtained, the final determination is frequently what we refer to as a scientific wild-🤬🤬🤬 guess (SWAG)"

retired
CIA Examiner
John F. Sullivan
 
  • #34
  • #35
Sorry bout that reposting, I wasn't trying to shove the ebook down yer throats, LOL! I don't know why it posted 7 times (deleted now)!

...oh, maybe....adnoid did it ;)
 
  • #36
This question is not about Casey, but about Cindy, George, and Lee.

If your grandchild, or niece had been missing awhile and the FBI came to you requesting a lie detector to rule you out so that they could move on to other things, would you do it?

Your question incorrectly assumes that they will be ruled out if they pass the test. Do you really think that LE's internal investigation of these people hinges on whether or not they pass a polygraph? Do you really think that LE would drop all present and future charges against Casey if she were to pass a lie detector test?

This test is a pointless, meaningless bunch of voodoo nonsense.
 
  • #37
If you had nothing to hide why not take one ?
Because it is SCIENTIFCALLY proven they are BS.

Exactly. Because there is no guarantee that the junk-o-meter polygraph would reflect your innocence. The idea that a bunch of wires suctioned to your body is supposed to be able to determine whether you're being truthful or not is primitive and laughable.

There's a good reason why this data isn't admissible in a Court of law.
 
  • #38
I would insist that the police give me and my family a polygraph as soon as possible as statistics show that parents are, in the majority of cases, the murderer. With relatives and aquaintances coming in second. If you wanted the best chance for your child to be found, an innocent family would not even hesitate. When you are innocent and your child is missing, would any parent refuse this tool to help police? Surely not! I have heard that the percentage of parents who turn out to be the guilty party in child murders to be as high as 95%. However to be honest in the last 20 minutes of searching for that info I was unable to locate it but will continue to look. What I did find was that a study of murdered children under 12 years old revealed that nearly 6 out of 10 are killed by their parents. I will try to post it but I have had trouble with that. It is http://www.deathreference.com/Ce-Da/Children-Murder-of.html

http://www.deathreference.com/Ce-Da/Children-Murder-of.html

Is there no way to make GA, CA, Lee or even KC take this? This surely does not help the perception of them in my mind. But if the family at least would have taken one, that would have carried alot of weight with me. Why oh why are they not doing every single thing they can to find Caylee and get to the truth? Did Caylee ever have a chance?
 
  • #39
Depends on whether I was involved or not..........................:crazy:

Yep. No guilt, no fear. Take the test, worry about the 'details' later. Let's find my kid.
 
  • #40
Let's find my kid.

Exactly, I agree. Let's find my kid. I didn't do it, do not focus on me. Is it worth taking the chance that you fail? It happens A LOT when people are not lying.

You fail....the whole focus comes off whomever really has your child and the focus goes onto you. Not good, IMO.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
83
Guests online
1,337
Total visitors
1,420

Forum statistics

Threads
632,382
Messages
18,625,538
Members
243,128
Latest member
Cheesy
Back
Top