He'd better make sure it's accurate or he faces being the first Pope to be charged with tax fraud.That is interesting. Clearly, Robert Francis Prevost, will have to file a tax return for 2025 with all his income listed.
I think he will be ok.He'd better make sure it's accurate or he faces being the first Pope to be charged with tax fraud.
Going into minute trivial details.....According to Nuttmegg's post, above, the Pope is provided with a substantial salary, similar to the salary of a U.S. university president. It is possible, though, that he will turn it down, as did Pope Francis, and just receive a modest stipend, instead. Then his taxes would be much lower.
![]()
Pope Francis could have been paid as much as the president, but instead gave his substantial salary away to the poor and needy
The pope also refused to live in the papal apartments or visit the papal summer residence.fortune.com
And by "religious", Cryptic means an order, such as Franciscan, Dominican, etc. Priests can be ordained either with an order or with a diocese.Going into minute trivial details.....
Most Catholic priests do not take vows of poverty. Rather, they take vows of a simple lifestyle.
Years ago, a military priest once told me that he was permitted to keep 30k a year and had to donate the rest. San Diego once paid priests 45K (less than a teacher at the time-but the diocese also kicked in a housing allowance). Bishops got more.
But.... Pope Francis and Pope Leo were / are members of Religious communities. These priests do take vows of poverty. If they accepted the papal salary, they would need to turn their papal salaries over to their orders beyond what is needed to live. But... a diocesian priest could keep the salary if he wanted to.
As a side note, the large Baptist church that I am familiar with solved the preacher pay problem permanently by paying them the starting salary of public school teachers in the suburb. Their salary then increases at the same rate as teachers do, and is publically available.
Going into minute trivial details.....
Most Catholic priests do not take vows of poverty. Rather, they take vows of a simple lifestyle.
Years ago, a military priest once told me that he was permitted to keep 30k a year and had to donate the rest. San Diego once paid priests 45K (less than a teacher at the time-but the diocese also kicked in a housing allowance). Bishops got more.
But.... Pope Francis and Pope Leo were / are members of Religious communities. These priests do take vows of poverty. If they accepted the papal salary, they would need to turn their papal salaries over to their orders beyond what is needed to live. But... a diocesian priest could keep the salary if he wanted to.
As a side note, the large Baptist church that I am familiar with solved the preacher pay problem permanently by paying them the starting salary of public school teachers in the suburb. Their salary then increases at the same rate as teachers do, and is publically available.
Very true @Cryptic.
Diocesan priests do not make a vow of poverty, whereas priests in religious orders do (i.e., Jesuits, Franciscans, Dominicans, Benedictines, etc.). And TBH, I wasn't familiar with the Augustinians until Pope Leo. As for diocesan priests, they are certainly encouraged to live simply and not make it a priority to accumulate wealth.
Speaking of poverty, I'm reminded of a funny story from a couple of months ago when enjoying a celebration dinner in D.C. following Georgetown University's Graduation Ceremony. A popular Jesuit Priest at my table was unusually quiet when focused at unboxing his new Apple iPhone 16Pro gifted to him when another older clergyman at the end of the table let out a heavy sigh and said -- "Yes, the Georgetown Jesuits... they take a vow of poverty, but we keep it for them." To which the entire room broke out in laughter. I only wish I'd recorded this!![]()