The charge sheet can be seen here: http://llnw.static.cbslocal.com/station/kpix/docs/2009/garrido-complaint.pdf
They way they are structured (for both Nancy and PG) is as follows:
Common charges for both of them include the following:
1 count of kidnapping a child under 14 sometime between June 91 and May 94 (I am guessing that is when Jaycee turned 14)
1 count of kidnapping sometime between June 91 and August 09
1 charge of false imprisonment sometime between June 91 and August 09.
Individual charges for each of them:
2 counts of rape in the first month (June-July 91). I'm not sure why these two would be considered distinct from the lewd conduct ones. It may be that specific dates can be attached to them or those particular ones were described in detail when the evidence was collected.
7 counts of lewd conduct with a child under the age of 14 structured as follows:
--- 1 count between June 91 and July 91 (the first month)
--- 5 counts at 6 month intervals between July 91 and December 93
--- 1 count between January 94 and May 94 (5 months, till she turned 14)
Then there is a gap between June 94 until November 94 (I'm guessing she was heavily pregnant at this time and consequently wasn't assaulted. That would mean the first daughter would have been born around November 94 if true)
Then rape charges start.
1 count in the month of December 94
3 counts sometime during 12 month intervals starting January 95 and ending December 97
Collectively these make the 29 charges.
Jaycee would have turned 18 in May 98, however, she would have been heavily pregnant with the second daughter around then, so there may have been no assaults for the last 5 months. Garrido claimed that things changed after the second child was born, and Jaycee claimed that Garrido "hadn't touched her in years". In any event no further rape charges are made after this point.
A point to note is that these charges were made soon after the arrests, and presumably before full investigation and assembly of evidence, so it is possible that some may dropped and others added depending on what subsequent investigations have revealed.
Thanks Natal. More specifically, I was wondering why, between July 91 and May 94, they have 7 counts of "forcible lewd acts" which specify that 1) sexual intercourse took place 2) force was used. It seems to me that if sexual intercourse occurred and force was used then those charges could just as easily be forcible rape like the others. Why aren't they?