question....

And most likely hate his dad for the rest of his life.



Likely, but I doubt they thought about that. Everyone knows what happens to child killers in prison, right? Well, those are MEN's prisons. Women's prisons are WORSE.

Just doing my job!

yes and im sure that was the problem john had

he had no idea what would happen. Prison ? yes no maybe ?

this crazy plan they hatched seems to have worked in the sense that no one went to prison

then of course, one must ask the question

how can he live with himself :furious:
 
yes and im sure that was the problem john had

he had no idea what would happen. Prison ? yes no maybe ?

I can only speculate. Damn it, Jim, I'm a superhero, not a psychic!

this crazy plan they hatched seems to have worked in the sense that no one went to prison

Has more to do with good lawyers on his side and bad ones on our side.

then of course, one must ask the question

how can he live with himself

I wouldn't know.
 
I totally agree with your thinking, SuperDave. But one thing- wasn't JR already divorced when he met PR? I know he cheated on his first wife, but I don't think it was with PR.
 
Right. I did not mean to suggest that. A lot of people think he cheated on his first wife with Patsy, but he didn't. he did not marry his adulterer. But he DID ruin his first marriage, and go on to marry the woman who, (MY OPINION) most likely killed his daughter. And he stuck by her.

(They say chivalry is dead)
 
I'm not saying it should have soaked through.I'm saying if JB was assaulted so much that it bled,there should be a blood trail somewhere.If mr said intruder got blood on his hand,and then pulled up her lj's,there should be blood on them as well.
Possibly, if he got blood on his hand; however, we have no idea if he got blood on himself. There wasn't very much blood involved and if the blood were released from the vaginal vault after the assault maybe it just stayed in the panties, esp. if they were a double-cotton crotch. That would not necessarily leave a blood trail.
 
If it's TOUCH dna...then why isn't there blood on the longjohns???? After all,there was on the underwear! If he touched them to pull them back up..then where's the blood???????
And are we supposed to believe that an intruder wore gloves for all but the most important part of an attack in which he was trying to conceal his identity ? Who would be so careless? WHY be so careless? After all,Mr Said Intruder was so meticulous that he left nothing else anywhere,in the entire house! Not even a single hair nor fiber! Said intruder even wiped the flashlight down(which would be needed to see with),and left no prints on the ransom note.
And last but not least.........WHY would an intruder even bother to pull the longjohn's back up after JB screamed?!! He wouldn't.He'd get the h*ll out of there !!
One more thing...an intruder wouldn't have bothered to change her into that size 12 underwear,either! Esp. not after she'd already screamed!And if he'd pulled it back up..then the size 12 underwear should have blood on the waistband as well! (not to mention the rest of the size 12 package that PATSY turned in to LE!).
THE 'touch dna' SCENARIO DOES NOT FIT! We must acquit! (go back to the drawing board,Team Scamsey!)


:clap::clap::clap:
 
What I'm saying if an intruder assaulted JB with his hand,(thus leaving dna behind) enough for her to bleed,then surely some amount of blood would be on his hand? so shouldn't some,if even just a trace amount (since it's being said the same dna was found on longjohn's),be on the longjohn's as well,when said intruder pulled them up and left his dna there ? shouldn't there be blood there too?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
178
Guests online
524
Total visitors
702

Forum statistics

Threads
626,847
Messages
18,534,243
Members
241,131
Latest member
FowlStar
Back
Top