usernamhere
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2018
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm sure that this has been posted before. It is not uncommon that someone takes steps to make sure that suicide is completed. Such steps might be tying hands, or placing a gag in mouth. For example, this article discusses using a soft material as padding between the noose and neck. Additionally, it discusses how one might use an object as a gag. Specifically in this article's summary it states, "In suicidal hanging cases certain precautions and preventative measures were observed. For example, tying the hands together was regarded as a means to make self-release impossible; closure of the oral orifice as a means to prevent the victim from calling out for help, and placing soft material against the ligature loop was thought to be an attempt to lessen the feeling of pain." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19237850
While it is not relevant to this case, my friend did attempt to perform CPR on a neighbor. He did not realize that rigor mortis had set in until a few minutes later. I have also called 9-1-1 and I have to admit I probably sounded weird during that phone call. I also have CPR certification, but have never had to use it. Training on a dummy probably does not provide a solid comparison to someone who is using it, or attempting to use it on a human. If the P's attorney thought that it was necessary for their case then he would have subpoenaed the person. He did after all have JS testify on direct for the P's case in chief.
While it is not relevant to this case, my friend did attempt to perform CPR on a neighbor. He did not realize that rigor mortis had set in until a few minutes later. I have also called 9-1-1 and I have to admit I probably sounded weird during that phone call. I also have CPR certification, but have never had to use it. Training on a dummy probably does not provide a solid comparison to someone who is using it, or attempting to use it on a human. If the P's attorney thought that it was necessary for their case then he would have subpoenaed the person. He did after all have JS testify on direct for the P's case in chief.