OT a bit for this thread and I don't want to derail it but I've been confused for a while about what exactly she is appealing. The DT argued at sentencing that she should be convicted of 1 lie and not 4 as it was one continuous lie. JP disagreed and sentenced her to 4 separate convictions.
I thought then and still do that her appeal was that it should have been just 1 conviction and not 4 and that was what she was appealing. However, I've seen many ppl post that she is appealing the lying conviction entirely.
Has anyone even seen her appeal filing to see exactly what she is appealing?
I thought then and still do that her appeal was that it should have been just 1 conviction and not 4 and that was what she was appealing. However, I've seen many ppl post that she is appealing the lying conviction entirely.
Has anyone even seen her appeal filing to see exactly what she is appealing?