Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/04 In recess Computer Exp Hearing

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #701
Wait 14 mitigation witnesses? The sealed motion has to do with this hearing? Why would the motion in this hearing be sealed?
 
  • #702
All I can think is she's just trying to be understanding of all sides and give him time. But it's obvious he's not going to do it so she needs to give him a good, hard kick in the butt and put the fear of God in him. She is allowing him to tell Juan he is asking for irrelevant evidence! That's not his place!
Um. Yeah. But this is the same judge who allowed a defense expert to begin telling the jury why 'their side' should be believed.

After that, her boogeying on the bench in a leopard print robe using her gavel as a makeshift mic, wouldn't surprise me.
 
  • #703
They didn't even have 14 witnesses for the original trial. :gaah:
 
  • #704
From WAT:

Wild About Trial @WildAboutTrial · 5s 5 seconds ago


BN's argument to Juan was that he didn't need the original image. It was irrelevant. #jodiarias

And JM isn't taking his word for it, which I completely agree with. And Bryan wants to talk to DT after being ordered to provide it and password? Well, my radar's up!
 
  • #705
She's a convicted murderess, there is no scott free for her. :)

There is if her conviction gets overturned by JSS because of some technicality. :facepalm:
 
  • #706
I guess we're not all that done...

William Pitts ‏@william_pitts · 3m3 minutes ago
Shocking. Nurmi filed a sealed motion. More secrecy... #JodiArias

Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer · 3m3 minutes ago
Nurmi says that the state has not yet turned over notes for its psych expert, Dr. DeMarte.
 
  • #707
I just feel uncomfortable with beating up on the Judge. I know that I'm in the minority, but I trust her and understand that this is a DP case, so she wants to make sure that the Defense, no matter how goofy it seems, has a fair trial. She probably is disgusted as the rest of us. Just my Opinion

I'm on the judge's side. I like her, and I think she's a good judge, I usually always defend her. But she has got to be a JUDGE sometimes. This needs to be BN's last chance.
 
  • #708
She's a convicted murderess, there is no scott free for her. :)[/QUOTE

I understand that she is guilty but not convicted until sentenced. We will see.
 
  • #709
BN is furious that Juan discovered his deliberate alterations mistakes and is calling him on it. JMO

I wonder why he didn't want to say the name of the third guy who worked on it?
So an anonymous 'expert' is hired to do a job the expert on record can't do himself?? Is that even allowed?? Don't experts have to be vetted by the court as having expertise??
 
  • #710
14 witnesses, he only has problems with 3 and yet he made a motion to dismiss the DP because he couldn't put on a full mitigation case???
 
  • #711
Where are they getting all of these witnesses? Are they for the penalty phase or for this hearing going on with the computer?

They're mitigation witnesses.
 
  • #712
Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer · 1m1 minute ago
Stephens orders that expert witness notes be provided by Monday. We are done. Back Monday. #JodiArias
 
  • #713
So 14 witnesses x 1 month each for Nurmi to question them( whatever delays he can dream up) = Never having a resolution
 
  • #714
Sandra webber, Jason, george, aunt sue, mom, dad, sister, ex boyfriend, the girl she worked with at dennys. Thats 9.
 
  • #715
  • #716
14 witnesses, he only has problems with 3 and yet he made a motion to dismiss the DP because he couldn't put on a full mitigation case???

He can see where this 'dismiss the DP' fandango is headed (down the toidy).
 
  • #717
There is if her conviction gets overturned by JSS because of some technicality. :facepalm:
Yes. That's what I mean..
 
  • #718
I don't know if I will ever watch another trial- after this.

Yea, because this one will still be going on after they all end.
 
  • #719
If it's so irrelevant then just give it to him. What does it matter to you what he wants or if he's asking for something "irrelevant"? It's not your concern.

And as arrogant as BN is you'd think he'd be delighted to prove the pros wrong, right?!
 
  • #720
And, no, the judge isn't on anybody's side. That's an exaggeration. If she were, she'd have dropped the death penalty a long time ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
52
Guests online
3,310
Total visitors
3,362

Forum statistics

Threads
632,606
Messages
18,628,892
Members
243,210
Latest member
griffinsteven661
Back
Top