What I got from Beth's site was that this is being handled more informally because this is a motions hearing and not court. People are calling each other by their first name because they have all worked together etc.
I didn't get the feeling from her that BN was being disrespectful in saying Juan didn't understand the computer stuff, more like he was understanding that it's pretty technical for someone that's not in the field. I kind of thought that she felt BN was right, but I don't know how much she knows about this stuff either.
She weighed in as saying she didn't believe they'd proven misconduct because nothing was intentional. But they may have mishandled evidence which could come up on appeal. She doesn't believe the death penalty will be dropped but that the




may come in.
She said filing affidavits is acceptable as long as both parties find the witnesses credible. I don't think I fully understand this part but my take was Nurmi wanted 11 affidavits but the 3 witnesses that wanted to testify were still a problem.
Sorry I'm rambling and long winded but I want to add that Juan's expert hasn't testified yet so we have no clue what he'll have to say. I'm on the edge of my seat until Wednesday.
She did say that Nurmi said they were winding down and she said