CA Ronald Lyle Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson found dead June 12 1994

  • #41
  • #42
what in the cuckoopants is going on in this thread?

thirsty lol... (not you @sds71)
 
  • #43
OJ Simpson is likely to avoid paying the families due to a tax lien against his estate

American Manhunt: O.J Simpson features exclusive new interviews with key figures involved in the trial, including former LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman, defence attorney Carl Douglas, prosecutor Christopher Darden, and Ron Goldman’s sister, Kim.The series comes to Netflix on January 29.

 
  • #44
OJ Simpson is likely to avoid paying the families due to a tax lien against his estate

American Manhunt: O.J Simpson features exclusive new interviews with key figures involved in the trial, including former LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman, defence attorney Carl Douglas, prosecutor Christopher Darden, and Ron Goldman’s sister, Kim.The series comes to Netflix on January 29.

I'm watching this right now.
 
  • #45
  • #46
Photo of Robert Kardashian, O.J. Simpson

Insiders claim Robert Kardashian Sr. helped O.J. Simpson hide crucial evidence in his wife and Ron Goldman's murder case.

Following the one-year death anniversary of O.J. Simpson, the disgraced NFL star's close friend and attorney Robert Kardashian Sr., has been accused of helping him get away with the brutal murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, RadarOnline.com can exclusively reveal.

Insiders claimed while Simpson acted vile, Kardashian betrayed his oath to the justice system by allegedly destroying key pieces of evidence in the double murder case.
 
  • #47
I can’t believe that the netflix documentary actually made me cry on OJ:s behalf. Such pathetic narcissism.

He loved her, but his personality disorder(s) got the best of him. Not sure he was a sociopath because he seems to have some actual feelings here and there. And he wasn’t a great actor.
 
  • #48
Ms. Shively and Mr. Heidstra each had witnessed between 10:40 P.M. to 10:50 P.M.; an irate person(s); a vehicle being driven similar to someone in a rush. The vehicle Ms. Shively saw was driving North on Bundy as opposed to the vehicle Mr. Heidstra saw that was driving South on Bundy. Both vehicles were traveling away from Ms. Simpson's neighborhood.

Mr. Heidstra testified he left 10:15 P.M. from his residence to walk his dogs. Mr. Heidstra went East on Dorothy and then turned to his left and went North on Westgate. Then Mr. Heidstra turned to his left and went West on Gorham. At Gorham and Bundy, Mr. Heidstra heard Ms. Simpson's dog barking hysterically at 10:30 P.M. to 10:35 P.M. Mr. Heidstra decided to avoid Bundy Street and turn back and go to a nearby alley that runs parallel to the East of Bundy. As Mr. Heidstra proceeded South in the alley, he heard two male voices which appeared to be arguing and then a gate being "slammed"(closed in a loud and forceful manner) at 10:40 P.M.

Also, Mr. Heidstra testified as he reached the end of the alley, he turned to his left and went East a few houses and turned and looked backed toward Bundy at 10:45 P.M. Mr. Heidstra saw a vehicle coming out of a dark area on Dorothy and turning to their right or South onto Bundy. The driver appeared to be in a hurry which was stated by Mr. Heidstra. Mr. Heidstra thought he saw a wagon car or a jeep. And then he further added that it might have been a Chevrolet Blazer or Jeep Cherokee(See Image Heidstra).

Mr. Heidstra's description of the vehicle is quite general. I saw only three consistencies in his observation of the vehicle: 1) The color of the vehicle was a light color, possibly white
2) The vehicle was wagon-like, meaning the roof extended over the trunk of the car
3) The vehicle went South onto Bundy Street and the quick acceleration of the vehicle
Hey OP I think your like of inquiry has merit as it is similar to how I am approaching this case where I argue ojs present at or near the crime scene doesn’t automatically mean guilt of commuting the murders. Many people assume the forensic evidence means oj is guilty of commiting the murders and while that is probably true I want to challenge that assumption. The forensic evidence proves oj was there at the crime scene but doesn’t prove what he did there. He might have been present at the crime scene that night but we don’t know if oj was the killer an accessory a conspirator or a witness. While I think oj probably did it since that’s the most logical conclusion. I think we also shouldn’t dismiss alternate theories out of hand. Especially since the main theory has some issues with it as well like no murder weapon being found or the lack of bruises on oj for example.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
2,699
Total visitors
2,830

Forum statistics

Threads
632,199
Messages
18,623,467
Members
243,056
Latest member
Urfavplutonian
Back
Top