Ron's Incident With The Gun Spark Investigation was opened by DCF.

[txsvicki]

I've read back a few pages here and my opinion that the arrests and drugs are just symptom of these people's mindset including Ron. Ron seemed to totally ignore the obsessive behavior that Misty had towards him and all his kids. He ignored the fake pregnancy test and Misty's reported taunting when calling him from WBG's. If he was told before Haleigh's disappearance, he also ignored Misty's claims of being "messed with" and allowed some associating with these men. Misty showed signs of being seriously messed up along with being a teeny bopper, but Ron ignored it all and moved her in, and then back in after throwing her out. He made the twenty something phone calls but it was all about him and his fussing with Misty instead of the kids. How could Misty even take proper care of the kids while fighting on the phone. She couldn't even wake up (supposedly) when someone got in the home, but yet Jr. claims to have been awake. I think Ron's failure to notice what type of women he took up with to be worse than his arrest record. He did not put his kids first.

 

[azwriter]

IIRC Marie had ONE arrest for Marijuana, most likely growing a plant/s in her house in 1997. She paid her fine and has been clean. She drives a school bus and her record has been checked.

Ron, OTOH, has been caught with heroin, cocaine, ecstasy, GHB (date rape) marijuana, methamphatimes, marijuana for sale, maintaining a drug vehicle, possession of marijuana and illegal prescription drugs. Comparing Marie with RC is prepostorous. Quite a candy store Ron Cummings had there, I must say. In most States, RC would be doing prison time.

Ron was caught again in 11/04 and convicted in 3/05 (he plead down) he got 6 months to pay his fine. Crystal and he broke up and he came to her house and took the kids (he told her a vacation) and filed for custody. He again got arrested for drugs in September 05. He claimed he took the kids because he thought CS was doing drugs...HA!

RC is now under the protective custody of his mother, grandma and attorneys. If not, I think we would be hearing about more problems...IMO.

Comparing RC with Ed Smart is silly. There is absolutely nothing similar in the two cases.

Ron Cummings has to be seriously considered as a suspect or one with knowlege of a crime...IMO. His history, behavior, assaults, retalliation and association with guns for threat and intimidation is striking. His hiring of attorneys to protect him screams a "Red Flag".

Ed Smart should not even be mentioned in the same paragraph with RC. I think it is insulting to Mr. Smart.

bbm - really, Whisperer, that many different drugs? That is quite a list! Especially the date rape drug. I would like to know, was it for his use, or was he offering it for sale? One is just as bad or even worse than the other IMO.
The thing about the illegial drug culture is that once you enter into it, you also are surrounding yourself with some pretty rough characters. It's not like you can go down to the corner store and buy the stuff over the counter from a kindly old man who runs the store and puts the drugs in a cute flower decorated bag for you to take home.
No, you're dealing with lawbreakers in the dark shadows who can be quite sleezy and when pushed or cheated can be quite violent when it comes to dealing. These are the people who are in your life when you deal in drugs - either buying or selling. These are the kind of people/thugs Haleigh's father was associated with. Which, to me, means Ron's children were also exposed to these characters whether they were present at a drug purchase or not. This is the reason I believe Ron put his children in danger by having this type of criminals in his life.
It isn't just purchasing the drugs, but having them stashed at home or on your person that invites unsavory, tough drug dealers into your family's life, too. JMO

 

[kiki the parrot]

Agree, there is no reason for anyone to keep repeating themselves, none whatsoever. Others are perfectly capable--time permitting--of reading through Ron's arrest records in their entirety for themselves--and simply will not agree w the same benign view some take of this father's activities, that's all. It seems somewhere lost amidst the teen drive in the country and the hunting, the drugs "not specified," and "particulars" of Ron's arrest history conveniently omitted include but aren't limited to such items as methamphetamines, cocaine, ecstacy, ghb, maintaining a drug vehicle, etc. and that's to say nothing of Ron's record outside of Putnam County (Sarasota County eg). Does it really require more than one arrest per substances such as these to raise one's alert level concerning the safety of children? The complete and unabridged records have appeared numerous times in the RonC threads and are also posted in stickies as well.

I confess... I do like and approve of parents who are not involved w the use, distribution, or possession of illegal drugs in their childrens' homes or vehicles, who manage to keep themselves out of jail, refrain from affrays (or bar fights) assaults on others, brandishing firearms and putting weapons in their mouthes or otherwise threatening to do themselves or others harm, and are generally not lawbreakers. I don't recall Ed Smart engaging in any of these prior to his daughter's abduction, nor his being arrested for either burglary or assault in the "mitigating" stressful months following his child's kidnapping--when he was rightfully more focused than ever on finding his missing daughter, not creating more sideshows.

But it isn't about whether I happen to "like" a parent, nor certainly about whether a parent is ever "deserving" of a child abduction. That's assuming that is in fact what happened, for beginners. No it's about their responsibility to protect their child and whether they make choices which continually predispose their family or put their child at risk. Anyone who still wishes to believe Haleigh's disappearance is a random fluke or even the result of a one-time exercise in poor judgment is free to do so. Prior to a total reversal by LE and some indication that this was a stranger abduction, efforts at convincing me of that--no matter how forcefully, and repetitiously hammered--will be fruitless. Frankly, there will be no meeting of minds nor can I see the least point in debating my heartfelt concern for Haleigh, Junior nor any other children w any who believe that smoking marijuana around children is harmless or wish to debate the "odd history" of either it's criminality or current illegal status as (just another) unlawful drug. JMO

arrot:

 

[KOOL LOOK]

I hardly agree that having one marijuana plant growing somewhere in her house would constitute a drug dwelling charge. So drugs are bad except for marijuana? Back in 1997 how old was Crystal? Do you think it was acceptable to grow an illegal drug on her property with her children living in the home? Drugs are drugs and a law is a law.

I most certainly was not comparing Marie to Ronald, I was comparing the charges that they shared. I hold each and every person to the same standard. You don't in my opinion and that's okay too. Thank you for taking the time to respond to my post.

the point is, how old was marie's children when these chares were levied? not infancy or toddlers. As you ask, in 1997, which is 12 years ago, how old were her children? umm it's 2009. Twelve years ago. Marie has 3 to 4 children? Supppsedly Crystal is 24, two years younger than Ron who is now 26 years old. Was Crystal the young age of 12?

 

[kiki the parrot]

And frankly, many people don't see smoking marijuana as being much different than drinking--and probably less dangerous to children than cigarettes. The only difference is that our culture has deemed marijuana illegal, and that decision has a very odd history.

(snip) :waitasec:

arrot:

 

[Whisperer]

I beg to differ but if you even had one small marijuana plant in your house, it would be considered a drug dwelling.

 

[Whisperer]

It is strange to me how one is worried about Crystal being a child when Marie had marijuana, yet nothing is said about RC getting arrested for drugs before and during the time he was taking custody. He was driving recklessly with them in the car, leaving the scene of an accident with injuries. Why the concern about how old CS was when her mom may have smoked pot? If condemming Marie for her indescretion with Pot is what has people "Up in arms" then I must beg you to take a long hard look at Mr. Cummings and ALL of his indescretions while having custody of the children.

There is no comparison between the two...IMO.

 

[Whisperer]

Concerning the gun incident, Jr should be removed and returned to Crystal..imo. It should have occured long before this if it weren't for the fact that TN or AS step in and are always there when DCF comes a callling. I, personally, don't expect any such thing to occur. If they haven't removed jr before this, they most likely never will. I hope I am wrong though. DCF is a farce and it has proven to be the case in almost every State in the Nation. When you leave the Government make decisions for children, it can be a tragedy as we have seen case after case in the news.

 

[PorcineGranny]

The issue is not whether or not either man has a "record." It would be possible for a person with a criminal record to have a child abducted--and that abduction would have no relation to his criminal record. I have reiterated this point until I can see no reason to keep repeating myself. Everything you say indicates that the only distinction you are making here is that you like and approve of one man and not the other. Elizabeth's sister recognized, eventually, the abductor because he had been IN THAT HOME. My objection is to the double standard: How is it a "terrible accident" that a worker in the home abducts a child and not a "terrible accident" in Ron's case where we don't even know what has happened?


I have read somewhere that the kids have regular beds and a bedroom, not just the mattresses in the master bedroom. Am I incorrect in that? I have never seen video of the kid's room(s). I don't see where owning a gun or a car makes him a bad guy. I own a gun and a car; my friends in LE do; most everyone in Western PA does. We have no evidence that he is now doing drugs. Our opinions and suspicions are not evidence. Certainly, he passed drug tests while on probation and he is under serious scrutiny today, with every twitch of the blogosphere bringing child welfare into his home. And frankly, many people don't see smoking marijuana as being much different than drinking--and probably less dangerous to children than cigarettes. The only difference is that our culture has deemed marijuana illegal, and that decision has a very odd history.

Of course someone can have a criminal record and terrible things beyond their control can happen, I perfectly understand that. I don't know either of these men, Ron or Ed. It is an accident in Ed Smart's case because he took precautions to protect his family from accounts I have read, it was an unfortunate accident that the handyman was a criminal who kidnapped his daughter. With Ron, he did not protect his children, he didn't even consider his children in my opinion when he chose Misty to be their caregiver. He only considered himself. This is just not a situation you can compare and if you think I have a double standard I'm sorry, cause I don't.

As for the marijuana, as far as I know, its still illegal whether you think it is n dangerous or not. Using it still constitutes breaking the law . You are giving him a pass on the marijuana cause you think its not any more dangerous than cigarettes, but if you are caught with it, your opinion will not matter to the D.A.

It is a great thing in this country to be able to own guns and protect one's family. I'm all for that. And that applies to cars and trucks, wonderful to have the opportunity for those wants and needs. Here is my point. I don't believe Ron is a person who should be allowed to have that priviledge because of his criminal record , his immaturity, his flashpoint temper. Guns in the hands of anyone should be considered deadly weapons and taken very seriously. Putting the barrel of a gun in his mouth in front of his small child indicates that he is not mature enough to have one. But, when I saw the film
of his home, and read the posts and realized that the mattresses were on the floor and Misty had to wash (so she says) her(Haleigh's) blanket in order for her to go to bed and saw the pillow without a pillowcase I was not happy knowing that Ronald had several cars, guns, and could possibly be involved in drugs in some capacity. I have seen the way some people live that do drugs, and I can tell you its not how you live. Its a choice. I'm sorry we can't come to some type of understanding on these issues but I guess we can't. These are my opinions and I'm glad you took the time to lay your opinions on the line also.

 

[Whisperer]

Owning a gun is one thing. People do have the right to bear arms; but using it to threaten and intimidate is a different story. Ron uses his guns to make himself appear "Macho"...imo. IMO..he uses the guns to intimidate people and force them to do what he wants them to do.

At the beginning of this case, we heard about a "gun" arguement/fight around the time Haleigh went missing. TN has backed off on that story after RC denied it ever happened.

Also, we have heard that he has perhaps threatened to put a gun down different people's throats.

He has threatened to shoot out the windows of a police car..

We have heard that he put the gun in his own mouth also via TM.

....Normal?...I think not.
....Dangerous and threatening behavior?....Yes!

 

[pittsburghgirl]

Re: Ronald Cummings, arrest record surrounding counties

In these counties, traffic violations, 9 years ago (Ronald age 16)
Marion County: traffic violation 7/20/2000
St. John's County: Nothing
Flagler: 7/8/2000 Speeding
Clay County: Nothing

Sarasota: 11/1999 Driver's license violation

9/29/2005: traffic stop, with police bringing in drug dogs. Found (alleged) morphine and a drug for which R. had no prescription (Xanax? drug not identified in court record). Was cited for violating PFA taken out by Crystal. Charges were dropped/abandoned on 10/18/2005.

Now, a look at Jane Velez-Mitchell's transcript below shows at least one place where much of the debate over Ron's record fueled. Jane and her guests speculate as to why the case was "dropped/abandoned": was he an informant? Lots of breathless speculation and talk as if Ron had been arrested days before Haleigh's disappearance. Talk that the charges were "mysteriously" dropped. All of this gets replayed over and over on these threads. What is omitted are the experts and witnesses who say things like this:

VELEZ-MITCHELL: All right, Pastor. 

Well, let -- let me know back, then, to Vinny Parco[ Private Investigator] Let`s assume that he`s absolutely telling the truth. He was not a drug informant for cops. What are the other possibilities, given this drug -- alleged drug history with all these arrests that had no convictions in terms of how it could factor into missing Haleigh? I mean, we have heard about drag deals gone bad, for example, in the past, where a family member is taken in retaliation. 


PARCO: I just have got to tell you, Jane, I truly believe that he has done nothing wrong in this respect. I don`t think he violated any code or any operation that might be present within the drug world. I don`t think he`s done any of that. I don`t believe any of that has a bearing on this particular case. He is incredibly distraught and upset. Let me tell you what he said last night. 

I spent an hour and a half with him last night. He told me last night -- we were out in the middle of the cold in North Florida. Believe it or not, it does get cold in North Florida. We were out in the middle of North Florida, and he told me this. He said, "Pastor," he said, "I kissed my daughter, went to work, trying to make an honest living, trying to make an honest wage. I came home eight hours later, and she was gone." 


VELEZ-MITCHELL: Period. End of story. Yes.


PARCO: End of story. 


and this:

PAUL CALLAN, CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY: You know, drug records can be very, very deceptive in the sense that a lot of times, charges are made, and because it was a bad search by the police, the case gets thrown out. Sometimes when they seize the drugs and they test the drugs, they don`t turn out to be the controlled substance the person was charged with.

A few years ago, a friend's son was stopped at a red light trap (where LE freezes a light late at night and then pulls the driver when he/she goes through the light after waiting for several minutes). The officer searched the car without permission and found an empty marijuana pipe. The kid (19) was tossed in jail and interrogated about giving up his "drug supplier." He was released in the morning but charged with possession of paraphernalia. A very well-know criminal defense attorney took the case; we went to the hearing but it was over before we got into the hearing room. Literally. We never got to sit down. Once they knew who the attorney was, they dropped the charges. Just like that. We don't know why the charges in Ron's case were dropped, but it is most likely that Ronald had a decent attorney who may have raised questions about the search. It may also be that the lab tests did not come back with enough evidence to go forward, that it turned out that Ron had a prescription for whatever he had, and/or the charge of violation of the PFA (a matter of distance) did not hold up. Ron's sister in the same JVM interview said he had a lawyer for these charges and that is why they were dismissed. When the charge is felony possession of narcotics, my lawyer friend says you mortgage the house to get the best legal representation possible.

Once again, arrests can be made, charges may be brought. That doesn't mean that the person will be found guilty or that the person IS guilty or that if he is, the state can make the case in a trial. What is clear to me is that we should not be tossing about these claims when we cannot possibly know what happened in court because the REASON for the dropped charges is not public record. And all that said, the arrest was 4 years ago--almost all of his adult life has been lived since then.

 

[pittsburghgirl]

With Ron, he did not protect his children, he didn't even consider his children in my opinion when he chose Misty to be their caregiver.
(snipped)

As for the marijuana, as far as I know, its still illegal whether you think it is n dangerous or not. Using it still constitutes breaking the law . You are giving him a pass on the marijuana cause you think its not any more dangerous than cigarettes, but if you are caught with it, your opinion will not matter to the D.A.

Hi, pgranny,

Thanks for the kind words. I do see your points. Many people should not own guns, as the events yesterday sadly indicate.

While I think Misty was a poor choice for a girlfriend or a babysitter (live-in or otherwise) or a wife, until we know what Misty's role was, I can't say that Ron didn't "protect" his kids.

As to marijuana and cigarettes, both of my parents were killed by cigarettes, and five of my friends have been killed by drunk drivers, so perhaps I have a bias there. I am not giving him a pass on the marijuana; I just don't buy a marijuana arrest resulting in ADI and a dropped narcotic charge 4 and 5 years ago as a reason to blame Ron for Haleigh's disappearance (until we know what happened to her) or a reason to take his son away NOW. It's been a good discussion; we'll have to agree to disagree.

 

[kiki the parrot]

And no one has said or implied that it's a solitary charge of "lil ol" marijunana possession or ancient history that's the sole basis for either of those lol which has been made abundantly clear now for those w the slightest intention of understanding the points being raised. It is an established pattern over a period of years from which a portrait of this person's character clearly emerges. Like I said, I'm totally fine w no meeting of the minds, but let's not misrepresent the points being made. JMO

arrot:

 

[Whisperer]

I don't know all about this agreeing to disagree stuff because it appears to me that advocacy is what we are talking about here, not a simple matter of perception. I say that RC is a bad egg. Others think he is just fine. I say he shows no characteristics of a good father or man and others say he is just fine. He has managed to lose his daughter and has done nothing to show good character. He has married the most suspicious one of all. This is more than just an error judgment; this is a constant and lengthy list of bad moves and bad mistakes. If not for money, he would be behind bars. Yes, he has attorneys, always has...doesn't leave home w/o them. No wonder Granny has lost so much!

So RC was pulled over for drugs again in Sept 05 but it was dismissed. It is clear that RC knows his way around the law and has hired many skilled attorneys to make sure he stays out of jail. He has again hired attorneys to make sure he stays out of jail once again.

.......according to RC, he "kissed his daughter, went to work, came home EIGHT hours later and she was gone".

.......sorry, but the defense you are using for RC does not hold much weight IMO. It is pretty clear to me that RC has a lot to hide and needs attorneys once again. Anyone care to figure out how much mom and granny have contributed to keep their son/ grandson out of prison?

 

[Whisperer]

Why does everything around Ron squeal of guns? From the first day of this case till today, we hear about RC and Guns.

Why does RC need several Attorneys again? How many innocent grieving fathers have needed an attorney when their child went missing?

 

[kiki the parrot]

I don't know all about this agreeing to disagree stuff because it appears to me that advocacy is what we are talking about here, not a simple matter of perception. I say that RC is a bad egg. Others think he is just fine. I say he shows no characteristics of a good father or man and others say he is just fine. He has managed to lose his daughter and has done nothing to show good character. He has married the most suspicious one of all. This is more than just an error judgment; this is a constant and lengthy list of bad moves and bad mistakes. If not for money, he would be behind bars. Yes, he has attorneys, always has...doesn't leave home w/o them. No wonder Granny has lost so much!

So RC was pulled over for drugs again in Sept 05 but it was dismissed. It is clear that RC knows his way around the law and has hired many skilled attorneys to make sure he stays out of jail. He has again hired attorneys to make sure he stays out of jail once again.

.......according to RC, he "kissed his daughter, went to work, came home EIGHT hours later and she was gone".

.......sorry, but the defense you are using for RC does not hold much weight IMO. It is pretty clear to me that RC has a lot to hide and needs attorneys once again. Anyone care to figure out how much mom and granny have contributed to keep their son/ grandson out of prison?

ITA w bold. It isn't an isolated error in judgment it is a persistent pattern of reckless, violence prone, unlawful eg conduct which does not a good protector nor safe homelife make.

arrot:

 

[twall]

Re: Ronald Cummings, arrest record surrounding counties

In these counties, traffic violations, 9 years ago (Ronald age 16)
Marion County: traffic violation 7/20/2000
St. John's County: Nothing
Flagler: 7/8/2000 Speeding
Clay County: Nothing

Sarasota: 11/1999 Driver's license violation

9/29/2005: traffic stop, with police bringing in drug dogs. Found (alleged) morphine and a drug for which R. had no prescription (Xanax? drug not identified in court record). Was cited for violating PFA taken out by Crystal. Charges were dropped/abandoned on 10/18/2005.

Now, a look at Jane Velez-Mitchell's transcript below shows at least one place where much of the debate over Ron's record fueled. Jane and her guests speculate as to why the case was "dropped/abandoned": was he an informant? Lots of breathless speculation and talk as if Ron had been arrested days before Haleigh's disappearance. Talk that the charges were "mysteriously" dropped. All of this gets replayed over and over on these threads. What is omitted are the experts and witnesses who say things like this:



and this:



A few years ago, a friend's son was stopped at a red light trap (where LE freezes a light late at night and then pulls the driver when he/she goes through the light after waiting for several minutes). The officer searched the car without permission and found an empty marijuana pipe. The kid (19) was tossed in jail and interrogated about giving up his "drug supplier." He was released in the morning but charged with possession of paraphernalia. A very well-know criminal defense attorney took the case; we went to the hearing but it was over before we got into the hearing room. Literally. We never got to sit down. Once they knew who the attorney was, they dropped the charges. Just like that. We don't know why the charges in Ron's case were dropped, but it is most likely that Ronald had a decent attorney who may have raised questions about the search. It may also be that the lab tests did not come back with enough evidence to go forward, that it turned out that Ron had a prescription for whatever he had, and/or the charge of violation of the PFA (a matter of distance) did not hold up. Ron's sister in the same JVM interview said he had a lawyer for these charges and that is why they were dismissed. When the charge is felony possession of narcotics, my lawyer friend says you mortgage the house to get the best legal representation possible.

Once again, arrests can be made, charges may be brought. That doesn't mean that the person will be found guilty or that the person IS guilty or that if he is, the state can make the case in a trial. What is clear to me is that we should not be tossing about these claims when we cannot possibly know what happened in court because the REASON for the dropped charges is not public record. And all that said, the arrest was 4 years ago--almost all of his adult life has been lived since then.

I know there was an arrest where he had some of the drugs in his possession that Whisperer recently stated. I read it somewhere and now I can't find it. Whisperer do you know where that happened? I will have to do some more searching.

Charges 9/05 Sarasota Co.:

DRUGS POSSESS-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION

DRUGS POSSESS-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION

VIOL INJUNCTION PROTECTION DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 10/18/2005

DRUGS-POSSESS NEW LEGEND DRUG WO PRESCRIPTION

One of the drugs named was morphine. Others were not listed. All of the above charges were dropped/abandoned.

Where does it state that drug dogs were brought in? I must have missed that.
I've heard that when RC was arrested in Sarasota Co. Crystal was with him so why wasn't she arrested? Was she or anybody else with him? Was he carrying the drugs or were they in the car? If the latter happened I can understand why the charges didn't stick-too hard to prove who is responsible for them. Even though the charges were dropped it doesn't make it right that he was in possession of them-it is illegal. The 9/05 drug arrest was made at the time that Ron was in the process of gaining custody and one of the reasons he stated he wanted custody was that their mother has a drug problem and here he is the one arrested for drugs!

Why does the transscript you posted state that Jane was asking Vinny Parco, P.I. and the pastor responded? Is that a typo? Why would Ron be speaking w/VP and calling him "pastor"? If that is the pastor talking and he doesn't know Ron very well (I don't think RC is the church going type) and RC throws him a bunch of bs then that is what he is going to believe. Which is what I think Ron did-he's cunning and manipulative and I have no doubt he would lie to a pastor.

As for your other quote-of course a defense lawyer is going to say that-that is how they operate!

The reason they were dropped is PUBLIC info.-just not available online. I'm not going to drive to FL to look at them or waste money buying them.

The police officer did his job by arresting RC. If Crystal or some other person was with him they could bring that up in court and raise doubt the drugs may not be the defendants and the judge throws the case out. There are so many holes in the laws people walk all the time.

1/02/2001 he has a license but he was cited for:

2001-01-02 1 TRAFFIC CITATION - #8654-AJQ-5 LECLAIR

2001-01-02 1 VIOLATION OF LICENSE RESTRICTIONS (BUSINESS PURPOSES)

He was fined and put on probation. He also had a 7pm curfew and had to tour the jail-lol-I guess they want to show you if you keep being bad where you will end up. Sadly it does not work for some people.

12/12/02 charges are:

2002-12-12 1 ARREST REPORT - PCSO (ARREST 12/12/2002)

2002-12-12 1 POSSESSION OF COCAINE

2002-12-12 1 POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE

2002-12-12 1 POSSESSION OF CANNABIS UNDER 20 GRAMS

2002-12-12 1 POSSESSION OF DRUG WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION

2002-12-12 1 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA

11/16/06
Guilty of Careless driving and expired registration-Volusia County

IMO all of Ron's charges, infractions, citations, what ever you want to call them show character of a person who is hot tempered, irresponsible, involved with drugs and doesn't obey the law. I didn't even list the charges that have occured after Haleigh disappeared. These actions could have led to the tragedy of what happened to Haleigh. You may not agree with me and that's fine, I respect your opinion, just stating my case as you have stated yours. If we all agreed we wouldn't have anything to discuss!

My thoughts and opinions only.

 

[Whisperer]

He had every drug known to man for his candy store....they're gone??? OMG.. I heard they were going to be deleting some files but didn't believe it to be true. utoh.

I will try to find the record....

 

[texasmommy39]

He had every drug known to man for his candy store....they're gone??? OMG.. I heard they were going to be deleting some files but didn't believe it to be true. utoh.

I will try to find the record....

What files where deleted? Morning

 

[Whisperer]

I have it for ya...BRB..