SC - Heather Elvis, 20, Myrtle Beach, 18 Dec 2013 - #8

[Salem]

its still way over 24 hrs between last cell phone activity (conversation text ping or whatever) and the father being notified of the car....thats the point.

The police report says the call came in at 10:43 p.m. So 11:00ish is more like it.

Salem

 

[jellybeanz]

WMBF News reached out to John Comparetto, a former detective.......

"Your police departments down here are getting a lot more phone calls," said Comparetto. "And it means they have to look into every one of those phone calls and every one of those tips. But it's a good thing.

many have been wondering why there just aren't many public details to go off of. Comparetto says it's all for a good reason.

"There could be some other items that really aren't for public knowledge right now that would hurt the case and slow down the investigation."

More at following link..........

http://www.kait8.com/story/24478865/heather-elvis-case-one-month-old

 

[Salem]

Has everyone already talked about the last times she posted on her social media sites?

If not, that might be worth looking at. I'm sure you all have scrutinized the content, but what about the times? We should add those to the timeline.

Salem

 

[Topcat]

I'm a little confused by the timeline . It says Thurs 19th LE was informed about the car at PTL at 11:10pm yet ,I reading here TE was informed at 7pm...what's right?

 

[thordis]

Even if there is a ~40 hour interval between HE's last contact and when her car was found, it seems meaningful that there was NO contact with anyone at all shortly after (I'm afraid to post the redacted hour of last cell contact).

It might be reasonable to think that she was indisposed in some way shortly after her last known contact time, which, by our allowable information, would be around 3 AM on 12/18.

 

[Woe.be.gone]

Finally found the statement TE made about how the car was parked at PTL.

http://www.hlntv.com/slideshow/2014/01/07/elvis-heather-missing-after-date-myrtle-beach-car-found

'"It was locked, parked parallel to the edge instead of straight on," Terry Elvis said."'

 

[jillycat]

I'm a little confused by the timeline . It says Thurs 19th LE was informed about the car at PTL at 11:10pm yet ,I reading here TE was informed at 7pm...what's right?

This is what has never made sense to me either. ?

 

[Salem]

I would go by the police report because they are required to log the time in. Time is very important.

But, that's just me. It seems there is some confusion over the times.

Salem

 

[jillycat]

If you look at the police report, the 11:10 p.m. time is when the report was entered by the officer. This would not be the time the vehicle was actually found, correct?

 

[Woe.be.gone]

I'm a little confused by the timeline . It says Thurs 19th LE was informed about the car at PTL at 11:10pm yet ,I reading here TE was informed at 7pm...what's right?

That's been my understanding that the car was located by LE on the 19th and TE was notified by LE shortly before dark and went over to PTL (with LE?) to view the car. TE began calling Heather and by 7:00 p.m. was frantic (because the calls went straight to vm). So, how would this info make sense if he wasn't notified about the car until 11 pmish?
(I also remember reading an early version where TE and DE went to the car together and TE drove the car home. Not sure when the version of LE physically knocking on TE's door came into the story)

I got sidetracked when I was trying to find a link earlier. I've never read or heard the 11:10 p.m. time before.

 

[cluciano63]

I would go by the police report because they are required to log the time in. Time is very important.

But, that's just me. It seems there is some confusion over the times.

Salem

But then, there was initial confusion over which day the car was first noticed...at one point early on, we heard Monday, which of course could not be correct. So it is hard to know how accurate the times on that initial police report are either. I have a feeling it was written from scraps of paper or little notes, lol.

 

[Topcat]

I would go by the police report because they are required to log the time in. Time is very important.

But, that's just me. It seems there is some confusion over the times.

Salem

Where did that 7pm time come from?

I remember reading it somewhere that TE was calling for an hour straight with the calls going straight to voicemail and the 7pm time was mentioned but I can't find it.....

 

[Woe.be.gone]

Oh, the 11:10 p.m. time is on the police report? Okay then, must be what happened in that case. Woe scratches her head.

 

[Salem]

If you look at the police report, the 11:10 p.m. time is when the report was entered by the officer. This would not be the time the vehicle was actually found, correct?

It was entered 12/19/2013 at 11:10 p.m. But the "occurred date" is entered as 12/17/2013 at 10:43 p.m. Now that would be the date/time the picture was texted to her dad. That doesn't make sense?

Salem

 

[Topcat]

That's been my understanding that the car was located by LE on the 19th and TE was notified by LE shortly before dark and went over to PTL (with LE?) to view the car. TE began calling Heather and by 7:00 p.m. was frantic (because the calls went straight to vm). So, how would this info make sense if he wasn't notified about the car until 11 pmish?
(I also remember reading an early version where TE and DE went to the car together and TE drove the car home. Not sure when the version of LE physically knocking on TE's door came into the story)

I got sidetracked when I was trying to find a link earlier. I've never read or heard the 11:10 p.m. time before.

We also "heard" TE was wearing gloves driving the car back to his home yet it isn't written anywhere I can find

 

[Salem]

So I guess we don't know when the car was called into LE? There haven't been any reports on that right?

The times on the police report cannot be right. The car would not have been called in exactly when the picture was sent to TE.

Oh my gosh! What a mess!

Salem

 

[Salem]

I know you are trying to keep things on the straight and narrow. But, BB just posted something that needs tobe seen. Puzzle coming together and there is a search this weekend. Trying to keep it paraprased. I can't post a link. Check it out.

You can post a link to the FHE facebook. It is also linked in the first post of this thread.

Salem

 

[Topcat]

It was entered 12/19/2013 at 11:10 p.m. But the "occurred date" is entered as 12/17/2013 at 10:43 p.m. Now that would be the date/time the picture was texted to her dad. That doesn't make sense?

Salem

bolded by me....was the time ,as you noted, she last had contact with her dad ...which was documented by the photo/text, the time the date gave 2-2;30am was his account and not documented by anything except his word.
this also means the photo came from her phone and not the date...he must have forwarded it to her and she to her dad..

 

[jillycat]

It was entered 12/19/2013 at 11:10 p.m. But the "occurred date" is entered as 12/17/2013 at 10:43 p.m. Now that would be the date/time the picture was texted to her dad. That doesn't make sense?

Salem

Wow, that is just odd.

 

[Ghostwheel]

The last phone ping/communication was reported as 3:41 a.m. (as far as we know). So was she talking to her roommate all that time. An hour to an hour and 1/2? Doesn't that seem like a long time for so early in the morning?

I had a 20 year old staying in my house for 6 months (friend of our family). Doing anything and everything for several hours was not unusual at 2-3 am. (Texting, posting, calling, youtubing....) Heck, I joined her watching lousy TV many a time. She did, however, have to return to the house by 1:00am, leave the location she was visiting on the white board, and leave the phone number of the person she was with. House rules.

[modsnip]... I have tmobile and on my online phone records, the text history is PST, 3 hrs earlier. I am sure that by now TE and LE are aware of this discrepancy and so I think the initial reference to 3am is actually 6am, if that makes sense?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bing, bing, bing! You might have just won a prize.

I would need to talk to the date, if I was a parent...he is the last known person to see her. Was she fine all night? Did her mood change at all? Did she answer any calls or texts? Did she say anything at all that might be useful? I just really would have to meet, face to face ASAP. Cannot imagine after a month, not having met him.

LE may have told TE not to talk to the date. And if the date has been cleared, TE might not want to talk to the date just yet. It may be too difficult for both of them. JMO.

It was entered 12/19/2013 at 11:10 p.m. But the "occurred date" is entered as 12/17/2013 at 10:43 p.m. Now that would be the date/time the picture was texted to her dad. That doesn't make sense?

Salem

That makes sense to me. 10:43 is the last confirmed picture of Heather alive. At the time the report had been written, the date probably had not been cleared, so the "missing" time would be right after the last time she could be confirmed to be alive and well.