There better be a pay off for this long drawn out projectile angles cross.... is DH going to argue that the angles don't match the very tall AM? JMO.
Yes, but likely to build-in proof of ineffective counsel so Murdaugh can ask for a retrial later, if he's convicted.Maybe on purpose for mistrial? Knows he can’t win unless he uses every trick in the book?
He's proposing the 2 shooter theory IMOThere better be a pay off for this long drawn out projectile angles cross.... is DH going to argue that the angles don't match the very tall AM? JMO.
Yep, Poot is really trying for the two shooter angle with this witness.He's proposing the 2 shooter theory IMO
Done it myself and handling weapons for years but if one plans to kill someone and make sure their down I wouldn't want to be shooting from the hip like a scene off the Rifleman with Chuck Conners. Want to put the bead on em just in case they decide to run and so on IMO.As long as AM has been shooting he can probably shot shot gun from the hip, I’ve seen it done.
Yes, I heard him bring that up after I posted.He's proposing the 2 shooter theory IMO
I'm surprised that the defence is asking the expert to add measurements and information to a diagram that clearly states "Not to scale". Measurements on a "not to scale" drawing seem inexact.
Have several 8 gauges in my collection, strap yourself in and hang on.Having 16 gauge in there is pretty wild. I wouldn't want to pull that trigger