Oh those pork and beans…what an analogy in a murder trial
Oh those pork and beans…what an analogy in a murder trial
WHAT? So he profited from allegedly killing his wife? Two weeks after this, AM was charged with their murders. Did he use proceeds from Maggie’s estate to pay for his defense? Buster should have become the beneficiary.
Alex tried to transfer the entire estate to Buster, but the Judge denied the request to ensure that the property remained in Alex's name so that it could be sold and the proceeds used to pay the $9 million in stolen money.
Is that why Alex admitted to trying to turn Paul over to take his pulse - because the second gun was under Paul, who was face down in the gravel (which explains the scratch on his face)?I cannot take credit for this theory around two guns in this crime -- someone else suggested it but I think it is very plausible.
Remember when Alec is in the car with SLED Agent Owen, Detective Laura Rutland, and AM's attorney? Owen asks Alec about the guns they keep there at Moselle. Alec talks about the "gun room" (at the house) but in an aside he mentions there had been a shotgun left around there (meaning the kennel/hangar area) but he doesn't know what happened to it. Alec adds he was going to need to find out where it is. All said as a very brief passing comment.
The theory here is that was THE shotgun -- Alex had left it down there in his planning. He knew no one would think anything of it -- it might even be assumed "irresponsible" Paul had left it out. Alec did not have to hide a gun.
But the unexpected probably happened for Alec -- that night Paul brought his .300 AR with him when he went to the kennels. Whether Paul drove with Alec or walked down, Alec wasn't counting on Paul having his gun. The two guns out in the open would not have arroused suspicions -- neither Paul nor Maggie would think twice about a lonesome shotgun in the hangar and Paul bringing his AR -- that was probably par for the course.
Continuing, Paul probably propped his gun against the wall as he took videos about 8.45. He then entered the feed room. Alec had already planned his alibi to go to Mom's and 9 o'clock was pressing in. Paul having a gun was a problem plus he was taking videos -- Alec had to neutralize Paul first and act quickly -- so he used the shotgun he had left there to kill Paul.
Maggie hears the blasts and comes around the corner. By then AM seized the opportunity to grab Paul's more lethal rifle to use on Maggie, who we know began to run and is further away. ... we sort of know the rest.
To me this is the most realistic idea I've heard of two guns in this double murder. As I said, not my idea, just sharing. MOO.
Tinsley is on the witness list.Does anyone remember this?
A private investigator had been secretly videoing Paul Murdaugh within three days of his death, and at one point even installed a secret camera at the entrance to the Murdaugh family home in Colleton County where Paul and his mother, Maggie, were murdered in June 2021.
The videos collected by the private investigator have been provided to detectives with South Carolina's State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) as part of the agency's ongoing investigation into Paul and Maggie Murdaugh's murders, as well as other suspected crimes tied to Alex Murdaugh, Maggie's husband and Paul's father.
Private investigator videoed Paul Murdaugh, Moselle property in days before murders
Agreed! That's also why I think he he agreed to or didn't fight all those "women" on the jury.<modsnip>
Seriously, I found his questioning of the female SLED agents to be very sexist, condescending. In this case, he was trying to imply the agent was just a dumb woman who didn't know the difference between a smart phone and a can of pork and beans. I'll refrain from name-calling.
Ok.....first and foremost I got the shakes from just reading this. I had to glance away a couple times and get my breath.I cannot take credit for this theory around two guns in this crime -- someone else suggested it but I think it is very plausible.
Remember when Alec is in the car with SLED Agent Owen, Detective Laura Rutland, and AM's attorney? Owen asks Alec about the guns they keep there at Moselle. Alec talks about the "gun room" (at the house) but in an aside he mentions there had been a shotgun left around there (meaning the kennel/hangar area) but he doesn't know what happened to it. Alec adds he was going to need to find out where it is. All said as a very brief passing comment.
The theory here is that was THE shotgun -- Alex had left it down there in his planning. He knew no one would think anything of it -- it might even be assumed "irresponsible" Paul had left it out. Alec did not have to hide a gun.
But the unexpected probably happened for Alec -- that night Paul brought his .300 AR with him when he went to the kennels. Whether Paul drove with Alec or walked down, Alec wasn't counting on Paul having his gun. The two guns out in the open would not have arroused suspicions -- neither Paul nor Maggie would think twice about a lonesome shotgun in the hangar and Paul bringing his AR -- that was probably par for the course.
Continuing, Paul probably propped his gun against the wall as he took videos about 8.45. He then entered the feed room. Alec had already planned his alibi to go to Mom's and 9 o'clock was pressing in. Paul having a gun was a problem plus he was taking videos -- Alec had to neutralize Paul first and act quickly -- so he used the shotgun he had left there to kill Paul.
Maggie hears the blasts and comes around the corner. By then AM seized the opportunity to grab Paul's more lethal rifle to use on Maggie, who we know began to run and is further away. ... we sort of know the rest.
To me this is the most realistic idea I've heard of two guns in this double murder. As I said, not my idea, just sharing. MOO.
Ok......Is that why Alex admitted to trying to turn Paul over to take his pulse - because the second gun was under Paul, who was face down in the gravel (which explains the scratch on his face)?
I thought AM might have talked about trying to turn Paul over to explain the cellphone lying on top of Paul -- it "popped out". JMO.Is that why Alex admitted to trying to turn Paul over to take his pulse - because the second gun was under Paul, who was face down in the gravel (which explains the scratch on his face)?
Planting information without receiving an objection. Grrr....Just went back to watch opening statements as I missed the first day of trial .. I'm rather disturbed at a comment made by DH when talking about AM buying two black out guns for each of his sons .. he points to Buster and says that AM bought one gun for Paul and the other for his son, Buster who is sitting in the "audience"seriously .. like this is a movie instead of a murder trial.
Sounds like the theory is that Alex suggested that Paul get the .300 gun before they went to the kennels to check his friend's dog. A shotgun was already in place at the kennels. Maybe it was always Alex's plan to have two different guns to kill two people in a "boat revenge killing" - he wanted to mislead police, including giving the impression of two shooters?Ok......
This makes sense......
But, why?
Why not continue to use the weapon you already have?
I am thoroughly confused as well.That contradicts other evidence of Paul's shoes facing the storage room when shot. I guess we'll have to wait for testimony to understand how the prosecution interprets the information. Another point to consider is that this information is in an affidavit submitted by the defence - which means the evidence is interpreted to benefit the defendant.
It does support the argument that the shooter was outside the storage room, that Paul was shot from the left, twice, with one shot going through the window. I still can't visualize how he landed face down as he did.