kgeaux
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2003
- Messages
- 7,598
- Reaction score
- 34
How can a RN make such a hypocritical remark, when science is a system of aquired knowledge :waitasec:
I don't think Cindy sees the FBI and BodyFarm test conclusions of "Possibly" and "could be" as an example of definitive aquired knowledge. I think when she says "science is just science" she is saying "the test results aren't 100% and I'm going to stake my life on the tiny percentage that these results are inaccurate."
I'm really sick of hearing from this woman. It's exhausting listening to her rationale, reasoning and twisted wording.nothing she has said at ALL has ever made any sense.
I don't think we're hearing any rational remarks at all from Cindy. IMO, she is speaking from a position of desperate denial.
I wish a reporter would post the hypothetical question to her that if SCIENCE could prove either that Caylee was alive OR if deseased, proved someone other than Casey murdered her, would she trust and rely on that same science as credible evidence then??? I bet she would stake her life on it!
That's easy, at least I think so. Yes, she would stake her life on whatEVER gave her hope in a living Caylee. That's really not difficult for me to understand! She wants the baby back, she can't believe her own child would have murdered that beloved baby, and her mind has found a way to function that does not require her to face up to the possibility of Caylee's death.