• #21
I live in Pima County, voted against Nanos the last 2 elections, and do not accept responsibility for what happened to Nancy! He only won the last election by less than 500 votes and did everything he could to shut down his opponent's run for the office (one of his own deputies who ran against him!!) Please don't paint Tucson & Pima County residents with such a negative brush because there was a lot going on behind the scenes in the sheriff's department that the general public didn't know about. Over the last couple of years the deputies started speaking out, quitting, and all the s--t became public. There was already no way he would have been re-elected in the next election, before this case. It's unfair of you to blame everyone in Pima County.
Absolutely! I find supporters of sheriff Nanos to basically have blinders on, whereby they completely overlook and refuse to consider his shortcomings. So frustrating! The blame for his shoddy leadership should be on him!
 
  • #22
The person sowing distrust and destroying morale is Nanos!!! NO ONE trusts or supports him anymore.
I agree completely! And I do not understand why some posters insist on supporting this obviously inept sheriff who has multiple disciplinary actions against him in the past and an ego the size of Trump's lol. It beggars belief!
 
  • #23
Absolutely! I find supporters of sheriff Nanos to basically have blinders on, whereby they completely overlook and refuse to consider his shortcomings. So frustrating! The blame for his shoddy leadership should be on him!

I think the blinders are on those who constantly show disdain for him based on misinformation.

Regardless of what percentage of votes he won by, he still won. Which means the people who voted for him shouldn't have their votes discounted just because his political opponents are drumming up mass hysteria against him with this recall effort.
 
Last edited:
  • #24
I think the blinders are on those who constantly show disdain for him based on misinformation.

Regardless of what percentage of votes he won by, he still won. Which means the people who voted for him shouldn't have their votes discounted just because his political opponents are drumming up mass hysteria against him with this recall effort.
With all due respect: It's unfortunate that the person driving the recall effort is doing it for political reasons and feels he will benefit from it in the next election. That does not negate the fact that Nanos has not only lost his support within the department but from a majority of Tucsonans. This case has just amplified the fact that he needs to be gone.
 
  • #25
I agree completely! And I do not understand why some posters insist on supporting this obviously inept sheriff who has multiple disciplinary actions against him in the past and an ego the size of Trump's lol. It beggars belief!

Unlike some, I was brought up to respect Law Enforcement - unless given a reason not to.

Please tell me just one thing that proves that Sheriff Nanos negatively effected Nancy and/or this investigation. I'll wait.
 
  • #26
That does not negate the fact that Nanos has not only lost his support within the department but from a majority of Tucsonans. This case has just amplified the fact that he needs to be gone.

With all due respect back - let that play out at the ballot box.
 
  • #27
With all due respect back - let that play out at the ballot box.
I don't want to go back & forth with you, Shony. We will have to just agree to disagree on our opinion of Nanos.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
71
Guests online
3,057
Total visitors
3,128

Forum statistics

Threads
645,679
Messages
18,846,351
Members
245,758
Latest member
AnnSara12345@
Top