Found Deceased Siletz, OR - 2yo Dane Paulsen, missing from yard of residence, 01 MAR 2025

  • #101
This is the least of worries now, but did the dogs return to the home? Are they the family’s dogs? Could the dogs have gone in the river, too? It only mentions dog marks, no details. Sorry if answered already. My prayers are with Dane and those who love him.

Also I didn’t realize until today just how close the river is to their home ! It’s just heartbreaking 💔
 
  • #102
This is the least of worries now, but did the dogs return to the home? Are they the family’s dogs? Could the dogs have gone in the river, too? It only mentions dog marks, no details. Sorry if answered already. My prayers are with Dane and those who love him.

Also I didn’t realize until today just how close the river is to their home ! It’s just heartbreaking 💔
Um, aren't they referring to search and rescue dogs?
 
  • #103
Thinking of you fiercely little man
 
  • #104
"Playing in the front yard, out of sight of his parents.". I wonder what the timeline is, who was home, when the last time he was seen by anyone.

Interesting, that the police did not do an Amber Alert.


I hope he is found soon.
They don't issue Amber Alerts unless they have some idea who took the child, and how, and where to. A child who wandered off doesn't qualify.
 
  • #105
  • #106
They have been searching the river from the beginning. Daily as far as I can tell from the FB post updates.
 
  • #107
1741489828532.webp

1741489857078.webp

1741489883902.webp

''Daily water searches are being conducted using watercraft equipped with specialized equipment and trained personnel.

The search operations include methodical boat searches over long stretches of the river, with one boat covering approximately 14 miles of the river on March 7.

Officials said on Wednesday they were narrow in their search on a different area. Volunteers searching the area have described the area as “very dense" along the river. “It’s a lot of blackberry and salmonberry that’s really hard to get through," Jeff Lawrence, with the Elks Lodge, told KATU.''
 
  • #108
View attachment 569314
View attachment 569315
View attachment 569317
''Daily water searches are being conducted using watercraft equipped with specialized equipment and trained personnel.

The search operations include methodical boat searches over long stretches of the river, with one boat covering approximately 14 miles of the river on March 7.

Officials said on Wednesday they were narrow in their search on a different area. Volunteers searching the area have described the area as “very dense" along the river. “It’s a lot of blackberry and salmonberry that’s really hard to get through," Jeff Lawrence, with the Elks Lodge, told KATU.''
Blackberries are nasty. They can do a lot of damage, even through sturdy clothing.
 
  • #109
I'm a bit puzzled... if he was at the address stated (20738), the front yard would have been quite a ways back from the road, with an entire residence and it's yard (20736) between him and the road. Appears to be all one piece of property.

AND there's a fence/gate and foliage between 20736 and the highway. It sort of appears that the entire front property (and possibly both) are fenced.

I don't like the river right there, either... but unless it's unfenced, or there's an ungated path down to the river through those trees, I can't imagine a 2yo managing to get to it. And any of those options are quite a ways for a toddler.

I mean, granted, the fencing is 3-strand barbed wire... but most 2yos still aren't going to mess with it. Curious is he's just turned two or if he's closer to three... gonna make a big difference in how far he could get.

So, was the gate open? Where'd the info about the vehicle come from? Are there custody issues at play?
LE said the dogs tracked his last steps to the rivers edge.
 
  • #110
They don't issue Amber Alerts unless they have some idea who took the child, and how, and where to. A child who wandered off doesn't qualify.
There should at the very least be a "Missing Child alert" issued. JMO
 
  • #111
I'm a bit puzzled... if he was at the address stated (20738), the front yard would have been quite a ways back from the road, with an entire residence and it's yard (20736) between him and the road. Appears to be all one piece of property.

AND there's a fence/gate and foliage between 20736 and the highway. It sort of appears that the entire front property (and possibly both) are fenced.

I don't like the river right there, either... but unless it's unfenced, or there's an ungated path down to the river through those trees, I can't imagine a 2yo managing to get to it. And any of those options are quite a ways for a toddler.

I mean, granted, the fencing is 3-strand barbed wire... but most 2yos still aren't going to mess with it. Curious is he's just turned two or if he's closer to three... gonna make a big difference in how far he could get.

So, was the gate open? Where'd the info about the vehicle come from? Are there custody issues at play?
He is 2.5 years old.
 
  • #112
I didn't realize about the dogs. How very very sad...
I didn't realize how near to the river the house was until I saw the aerial photo from one of the earlier links in the thread from the Sheriff's Dept which I enlarged and attached (you lose some of the pixel quality but you can see more of the area between the house and the river.) From the photo it looked like there was a trampoline perhaps out back of the house (the round object). That may have been someting else but my first glance, I thought "play area". I couldn't see any fencing on the back of the property between that area and the water but with the trees that area isn't in the open. If he "loved the water" he would naturally be drawn to it and would be too young to recognize the danger. My heart goes out to his parents.
 

Attachments

  • dp house aerial view enlarged.webp
    dp house aerial view enlarged.webp
    120.2 KB · Views: 93
  • #113
There should at the very least be a "Missing Child alert" issued. JMO


I'm not sure what you mean. There is no "Missing Child Alert" that I'm aware of other than Amber Alerts.


MOO IMO
 
  • #114
The search for two-year-old Dane Paulsen, who vanished from his family’s yard in Siletz on March 1, remains ongoing as authorities concentrate efforts on the Siletz River.


The Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office (LCSO), in coordination with multiple agencies and volunteers, has ramped up water-based search operations utilizing boats, sonar, and remotely operated underwater drones.


Volunteers and officials alike describe the dense terrain along the river as a significant challenge in the search. Thick blackberry and salmonberry bushes make it difficult to navigate, raising concerns that the child could be hidden from view despite extensive ground searches.

 
  • #115
I didn't realize how near to the river the house was until I saw the aerial photo from one of the earlier links in the thread from the Sheriff's Dept which I enlarged and attached (you lose some of the pixel quality but you can see more of the area between the house and the river.) From the photo it looked like there was a trampoline perhaps out back of the house (the round object). That may have been someting else but my first glance, I thought "play area". I couldn't see any fencing on the back of the property between that area and the water but with the trees that area isn't in the open. If he "loved the water" he would naturally be drawn to it and would be too young to recognize the danger. My heart goes out to his parents.
 
  • #116
Hoping his folks have relatives and friends close by the area.
 
  • #117
  • #118
Still missing! I'm checking multiple times a day. IDK it's just too relatable. Seeing those photos of the divers, God just imagine knowing they're out there looking for your little boy. Thinking of you, Dane and family.

Based on FB activity the parents do have a great deal of support. They have family in the area and are connected in the local business scene. Huge community efforts are being made. I'm glad to see that (I'm sure it's not keeping their heads from exploding on repeat, though).
 
  • #119
I'm not sure what you mean. There is no "Missing Child Alert" that I'm aware of other than Amber Alerts.


MOO IMO
But perhaps there should be? Why do we have Silver Alerts for missing elderly people who wandered off, but no alert for children who wander off? I don’t understand the difference.
 
  • #120
Hey all, sorry first time posting about this little boy but have been closely following since he went missing. It seems there is now questions raised about possible abduction, the parents have offered a cash reward for his safe return
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
59
Guests online
1,149
Total visitors
1,208

Forum statistics

Threads
632,419
Messages
18,626,310
Members
243,147
Latest member
tibboi
Back
Top