Skyla Whitaker, 11, & Taylor Placker 13 - Found Murdered - #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #101
When I heard them say it, it didn't sound like they were thinking about it at the time...as they were careful to be deliberate when talking about him. Does that make sense?
 
  • #102
  • #103
  • #104
He got a plea bargain on those assault with a deadly weapons charges. I wonder who he assaulted.
 
  • #105
  • #106
He got a plea bargain on those assault with a deadly weapons charges. I wonder who he assaulted.

I don't know. Touia Duncan and her minor child took out a protective order against him twice. There's a picture of a Touia on Linda Kaye Placker's poetry site. She's shown with two of Linda's brothers, who she calls J.C. and Willey (Touis is identified as "Willey's wife".
There's also a picture of Taylor on there when she was younger.

http://v4mp-b1tch.tripod.com/id14.html
 
  • #107
And . . . he was "doing something" "suspicious," according to the report. I wonder what he was doing.


Can they be more vague?? What was he doing!?
 
  • #108
A revolver would be too slow. Per Brown, the girls had no time to react and they were only five feet apart.

I thought Mark Furhman said according to his inside sources one gun was a revolver and the other one was of a higher power (semi-automatic)?

A revolver can kill someone Suzi....in rapid fire this girls wouldn't have had a chance to react before being hit. Police use to carry 38 revolvers all the time for their own protection. I just don't agree that a revolver couldn't bring these girls to their knees and quickly.

imoo
 
  • #109
I must get too much into Mark F. to listen half the time because I didn't hear him say that. LOL (Just a little humor) Was that tonite? I am watching the rerun at midnight.
 
  • #110
Mark Furhman is easy on the eyes...that is for sure!
 
  • #111
I thought Mark Furhman said according to his inside sources one gun was a revolver and the other one was of a higher power (semi-automatic)?

A revolver can kill someone Suzi....in rapid fire this girls wouldn't have had a chance to react before being hit. Police use to carry 38 revolvers all the time for their own protection. I just don't agree that a revolver couldn't bring these girls to their knees and quickly.

imoo

The girls didn't react. And that's per J Brown with OSBI. I'm sure a revolver could be involved. I just don't think it was used first. It was probably used for the headshot which appears to be an insurance shot. Yes, LE carry revolvers, but the are for the most part outgunned. Sure a revolver could bring someone to their knees. But both girls at the same time? They were only five feet apart. One shot and the other would have ran or reacted. They were both dropped where they were.
 
  • #112
Two weapons and different calibers. Can one POI be packing two different weapons and shoot both angels with such precision, such accuracy??? Sorry, I don't think so...

Two perps and two guns.

That's what I think too Data.
 
  • #113
Okay, if we go on the theory that there was 2 🤬🤬🤬, then why was only one man standing by the truck in the middle of the road seen?
 
  • #114
Because the other was in the woods doing something illegal perhaps? Or the other two were in the woods getting set up for an ambush of the girls and he was the getaway driver? They had just shot the girls and the other was inside the truck ducked down not to be seen? He was waiting on the others who had not arrived yet and they shot the girls when they did arrive? (I could do this all night)
 
  • #115
In the woods, I think. There is so much brush in there for anyone to hide. I wish that reliable witness could give us more info.
 
  • #116
I would like to know what side of the road his truck was on.
 
  • #117
I just don't get how it could be drug related since the guy was seen by at least 6 people. Why weren't the drug runners seen by anyone and why shoot the girls and make sure that all the witnesses remembered the truck and the guy standing there. I'm thinking this was a couple of drunk, high, angry guys who were either going to impulsively abduct the girls or it was a thrill killing. Hopefully it won't be something really senseless like the guy was out there trying to steal gas because he was running really low.
 
  • #118
Did OSI say how far the truck was from where the reliable witness saw the girls, did we get a timeline yet?
 
  • #119
I just don't get how it could be drug related since the guy was seen by at least 6 people. Why weren't the drug runners seen by anyone and why shoot the girls and make sure that all the witnesses remembered the truck and the guy standing there. I'm thinking this was a couple of drunk, high, angry guys who were either going to impulsively abduct the girls or it was a thrill killing. Hopefully it won't be something really senseless like the guy was out there trying to steal gas because he was running really low.

Gosh, I hope not. I think an abduction gone bad, that's where I am leaning towards. Sexual predators and the 2 girls probably told them where to go. Pushed the wrong button on some crazed lunatics.
 
  • #120
Here is some criminal info. on Christopher Ryan Placker, Weleeta, OK.
http://www.oscn.net/applications/oc...e=caseGeneral&casemasterID=19541&db=Cleveland

Thanks for this info. It could be possible since OSI admitted that they thought these 🤬🤬🤬 were local.

Could be the connection they may have. Someone Christopher might had known from a bar, or jail, something??

Since the ratio is higher in more likely murders are done by people who are known to eachother, this is a plausible connection.

Can someone pass this onto OSI...make sure they are aware?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
82
Guests online
3,749
Total visitors
3,831

Forum statistics

Threads
632,254
Messages
18,623,920
Members
243,066
Latest member
DANTHAMAN
Back
Top