Skyla Whitaker, 11, & Taylor Placker 13 - Found Murdered - #9

[SeriouslySearching]

Doesn't sound any more crazy than everything else that we have mentioned on these threads. (I know I have come up with some insanity here.)

There isn't a clear motive at all and we don't know what set things off. Something happened. Taylor would have "lost it" if someone had hit her dog tho.

 

[Beyond Belief]

The only thing insane is the crime itself. The dog could have just been chasing the truck. That kind of thing makes alot of people go into road rage.

 

[Claycat]

Pat Brown gave her take on this. I don't recall exactly what she said, but she thought it was sexual and to look for two young locals who spent most of their time together. (A lot of what she said didn't make sense to me especially since the POI doesn't fit into her scenario.)

This is very interesting to me, because it does fit my images!

 

[SeriouslySearching]

The only thing insane is the crime itself.

Isn't that the truth?! Nothing makes any sense about this one.

 

[Beyond Belief]

This is just so strange. You would think this guy would leave a trail of death and destruction.

 

[SeriouslySearching]

We don't know he hasn't tho. We don't even know if he was the actual shooter or if there were others involved.

 

[TeeOne]

This is very interesting to me, because it does fit my images!

Claycat,
I'm very intrigued by everything you have seen & felt regarding what happened, it all seems very possible.

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Peter Placker speaks out – thanks community for support
http://www.koco.com/video/16712513/

Well watching Pete, sure brought tears to my eyes, first thing this morning.

I sure hope OSBI can find out who killed these young girls.

I am like Pete, I want to know who and how they could have done such a horrible thing.

imoo

 

[christine2448]

This killer/killers obviously didn't care if he/they left them as evidence since LE reported a "pile" of them. I would have to think he/they didn't pick any of them up which would possibly mean if they are "missing" some...the casings could have been inside the vehicle and not left behind. Bringing the dog in to try to find them was a good idea to rule out they were hidden by the grading of the road or off in the brush. (Gives me hope if they find the truck...they may find evidence to tie him directly to the crime inside.)

I am thinking too possibly them searching around for more casings, maybe they are seeing if similar casings are in the area because the same shooter(s) could have been shooting another day, earlier that day, that could be identified? So, if Bob and Joe were shooting in the woods, unrelated time/day and they found casing that match ones from the crime scene they could have their killers(s)? A thought. Not sure if I'm making enough sense......where is my coffeeee?

 

[oceanblueeyes]

I am thinking too possibly them searching around for more casings, maybe they are seeing if similar casings are in the area because the same shooter(s) could have been shooting another day, earlier that day, that could be identified? So, if Bob and Joe were shooting in the woods, unrelated time/day and they found casing that match ones from the crime scene they could have their killers(s)? A thought. Not sure if I'm making enough sense......where is my coffeeee?

You are making perfect sense.

I am sure they would search a wider area and take in all other bullet casings so they could be forensically tested in comparison to the ones located in the area of the bodies.

imo

 

[Patience]

This is just so strange. You would think this guy would leave a trail of death and destruction.

I agree. We would of heard of other violent crimes in the area but there apparently are not any obvious related crimes that we know of. This is an isolated incident and the girls were the intended target. It was them who had to be silenced. This tells me that they were going to tell on someone for something.

 

[PGW]

Does fit what you were saying, ClayCat!

Okay, what about this scenario, though, just logically not intuitively, what if they were actually reshot to confuse law enforcement. The reason for reshooting with a different gun is that the different gun is illegal and not registered, and can't be traced, so those shell casings were left behind conspicuously to make LE think this was the only type of gun. The other casings were picked up because the first murder weapon actually is registered or traceable to the shooter.

 

[Garnan]

Today's the first I've heard mention of a dog, and I have a theory.

The girls are walking down the road with the dog, some jack a s s, drives by and shoots the dog. The girls flip out (much like I would). He stops, maybe laughs, and they attack him. (I would). He shoots them in the anger and frenzy.

It may sound far fetched, but the world is full of jerks who shoot dogs and cats for fun. And to do it in front of those little girls may have given him a special thrill. I imagine BOTH of those girls would go crazy and go off on someone that did that.

If something like that happened to my dogs, you better believe the S.O.B. would have to shoot me.

 

[Beyond Belief]

they would be crying and screaming. there would also be a dead dog or its blood on the road.

btw where is the dog?

 

[Garnan]

they would be crying and screaming. there would also be a dead dog or its blood on the road.

btw where is the dog?

We don't know that there wasn't a dead dog there do we? He also could have tossed it in the back of his truck and disposed of it elsewhere. Much easier to get rid of a little dog body than two little girls.

 

[Beyond Belief]

Good point, but why bother getting rid of the dog. Or was it a dog someone would be interested in stealing.

 

[Beyond Belief]

Are there issues in that part of OK with illegal dog fighting or fighting? Maybe an issue like that rather than drug activity that they stumbled upon.

 

[Albert18]

The reason we don't know more about the dog is because of the pathetic reporting of this story by the local media. How could you initially see a report about a dog and not want to know more? People who go into journalism have to be the most non-curious people in the world.

 

[christine2448]

The reason we don't know more about the dog is because of the pathetic reporting of this story by the local media. How could you initially see a report about a dog and not want to know more? People who go into journalism have to be the most non-curious people in the world.

Why not find the article and reporter name and email them inquiring about the dog. You'd be surprised at how much info you can learn by communicating w/reporters on cases.

In Amber Harris' case, reporters would send us unedited footage of pressers even BEFORE air, ect so that we could get 'everything', the actual aired shows were edited and we would not learn things that were said or questions asked f not for the awesome reporters who worked with us.

 

[kahskye]

Why not find the article and reporter name and email them inquiring about the dog. You'd be surprised at how much info you can learn by communicating w/reporters on cases.

In Amber Harris' case, reporters would send us unedited footage of pressers even BEFORE air, ect so that we could get 'everything', the actual aired shows were edited and we would not learn things that were said or questions asked f not for the awesome reporters who worked with us.

Ok, I just emailed the editors in regards to the dog. Let's see if they respond.