Sleuthing Madeleine's disappearance.

Status
Not open for further replies.
If he was a genuine suspect, they would have gone back to question him.

:moo:

the fact they were more interested in catching their plane home rather than questioning him when they had the chance suggests they didnt really think he had any information and that it was all bluster, doesnt change the fact though that hewlett is a convicted sexual predator, but not of three yr olds
:banghead:
 
I know the horrible history, I said he doesnt have form for abducting and abusing three year olds! There is a huge difference.

Fabgod, you were asking when the photo of Hewlett taken with his hands in his pockets was taken, which is uncannily similar to the artists sketch in 2008 of Cooperman, it is believed to be 1997.

http://raymondhewlett.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/hewlett-mccann-abductor-sketch.html

Alot of info on RH on this blog

Cheers Clutchbag, you know what I am thinking, so I will leave it there :winko:
 
I can't actually believe we're debating RH again, after all this time.

<modsnip>
Can anyone indicate and link what evidence there is that he is actually involved, because all I have is a bunch of insinuations from <modsnip>

TIA
 
I find it a bit precious that the McCanns are complaining about the press when they were the ones who contacted them in the first place, and continued to speak to the media every chance they got.

:cow:
 
I find it a bit precious that the McCanns are complaining about the press when they were the ones who contacted them in the first place, and continued to speak to the media every chance they got.

:cow:

Unlike alot of the victims of phone hacking and press intrusion into their private lives the mccanns GOT legal redress, they GOT over a million pounds from the papers and they GOT apologies many times

its bizarre to say they were victims of the media which they courted themselves and also lying to them from day one and only complained when the stories were not supporting them when they were made suspects

the mccanns jumping on the leveson inquiry bandwagon was predictable

IMO the news of the world printed kate mccanns diary with permission to sell papers and then agreed to pay her for doing so, saying it was sorry, balmy :D

her diary entries printed by the NOTW were nothing compared to what she wrote in her book, for which she also got paid tonnes of money for the sun/notw to serialise, money money money
 
For Christmas I wish -

That this whole mess be reexamined from beginning to end by impartial and reliable parties.

I don't think it's going to come true.

I never did get an answer from those on the defense, regarding the book advance being accounted for in the "fund"?
 
For Christmas I wish -

That this whole mess be reexamined from beginning to end by impartial and reliable parties.

I don't think it's going to come true.

I never did get an answer from those on the defense, regarding the book advance being accounted for in the "fund"?


the book advance (?? Dont know the amount) PLUS money from the Sun newspaper for serialisation rights which was reported at a quarter of a million pounds

not in any accounts so far maybe in the next lot? But not holding my breath
 
I don't know how things work in the UK but in Australia it would be illegal to claim income in the incorrect financial year.

So - we know she got an advance for her "account of the truth", but it was never, ever accounted for.

Kind of ironic when you consider the proceeds of the book were claimed to have been directly used for the Fund.

Maybe the Tax Department will finally be able to deliver some justice, by stepping in and charging the McCanns with tax crimes (hiding income).

That's the way they finally caught Al Capone.

:cow:
 
the thing about Howlett is if we had to imagine the type of person who was capable of abducting Maddeleine - this would be the guy we would come up

a known paedophile
a record of abuse and kidnapp
someone who would not think twice about this - his past record of using paint stripper to subdue - and this is only the crimes he has been apprehended for - what he got up to in his travels across ireland and Europe god only knows - his last known offence was in 1988 - I certaibnly doubt he has been living an innocent life since then -

How did he first come of notice to the PJ - he must have been known in the area

anyway - all just subjecture - and probably history - nothing has come in past 5 years

lets see what Grange says if and when they report

Hewlett never came to the notice of the PJ. It was the McCann detectives who dug him up and started the accusations.

The PJ refused to investigate as by then the case was archived. The PJ no longer cared to listen to the McCanns and their allegations.

I started this thread with the intention that it would be a place for genuine sleuthing, that is, facts, links, knowledge...not vague assumption and opinion masquerading as fact.

We have enough of that on the other threads.
 
the pj had a list of sex offenders who they investigated including RH it seems, listen or read rather around 1 min on the youtube video called the mccanns and suspect raymond hewlett a clown act, sorry i am on my ipad and cant copy the link from there

Mr amaral suggests they were turfing over suspects already looked into by the PJ, thus sticking two fingers uo at their investigation, this was in context of the new suspect RH

The upside of this being regurgitated is that its possible the british police are investigating the witnesses who put his name out in the media in the first place and if found to be liars could be charged with, along anyone they were in cahoots with, perverting the course of justice

Its a known fact the mccanns badgered witnesses
 
I don't know how things work in the UK but in Australia it would be illegal to claim income in the incorrect financial year.

So - we know she got an advance for her "account of the truth", but it was never, ever accounted for.

Kind of ironic when you consider the proceeds of the book were claimed to have been directly used for the Fund.

Maybe the Tax Department will finally be able to deliver some justice, by stepping in and charging the McCanns with tax crimes (hiding income).

That's the way they finally caught Al Capone.

:cow:


yes, their fund is definitely dodgy not just because its kept secret but from what they posted in. Their first accounts, that they paid someone 36 thousand pounds to set up some two bit 12 page static website
 
Their escapades know no bounds, do they?

I wonder how they look at themselves in the mirror, I really do.

One day soon those twins will be teenagers, and you know what teenagers do?

They dislike their parents and throw every insult at them they can find.

Sean and Amelie may well demand to know the truth about their sister. They may read for themselves the facts of the case, and assuming they aren't completely brainwashed, they will start asking their parents for an explanation of some of these things.

The truth may well come out of the mouths of babes, one day.
 
I too think they will have big problems with their children in later years

Kids know when they are being lied to
 
Her parents, Gerry and Kate, were treated like a commodity as an "insatiable" hunt for headlines led to the sacrifice not only of the search for the truth but of their "dignity, privacy and well-being", he said.

Mr McCann said: "I would have liked to have seen a properly independent regulation of the press, whereas I think he has given the press another opportunity of self-regulation," he told the BBC Radio 4 Today.


Extraordinary statement...!

Thoughts -

1. have the McCanns not heard of the internet?

The genie is out of the bottle. Regulation of the press is totally pointless in the 21st century, a futile exercise redolent of censorship and the antics of the Nazis, the Communist Chinese, Stalin's Russia, and countless other corrupt regimes.

The information is out there on the internet, available to anyone who has a smart phone. Too late Gerry, and just another reflection of your audacious attempts to steer and control the media and the flow of information to the public.

You tried to censor Amaral's book, again pointless, did you not realise it has been available on the internet for years?

2. People have carp written about them all the time on facebook (apparently, I don't use it). Why should those written about in the print media have any more protections than those on social media?

3.Most people don't do things that get them written about in the news or in books, in the first place.

MOO
 
Unbelievable.

It sounds as though the Murats are very angry and haven't got past being accused, one little bit.

God knows what direction the break in this case will come from, but the signs are, something is going on.

There's an ominous silence on the threads too...like crows falling silent before a storm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
162
Guests online
666
Total visitors
828

Forum statistics

Threads
627,068
Messages
18,537,349
Members
241,172
Latest member
justicefornoah
Back
Top