Isn't the law that it should be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt". To me this does not mean 100% absolute. Not many things in life are 100% absolute. I also look at the totality of the events and all of RH's actions and statements. Just one strange/unusual action or statement would not seem significant to me, but in this case almost if not all of RH's actions/statements are unusual and not normal to me. I try to keep an open mind and look at the facts and all the facts, not just one isolated point. When CH's death was first announced in the news, I thought the LE were too aggressive in charging RH. The PCH changed by mind. I posted earlier the link to the Good Morning America Show ABC legal analyst who said the info in Sunday's AJC article would not have changed the judge's decision at the PCH. If this case goes to trial, we will all be able to view the parking lot video tape(s).
When my adult daughter was 3 years old, our car pool with another child changed for the day and I was taking the girls to preschool instead of the usual picking up after school. I forgot they were in the car and headed out for work. BUT I did notice after about 10 minutes, and a few missed turns, that the girls were sitting quietly in the back seat. I noticed the girls in the back seat when I changed lanes on the interstate. I did not forget for 7 hours! Now I sometimes have my 2 preschool grandkids with me in my SUV. I always look in the back seat when getting out of the car. The near miss scared me to death.
