Is this the first they are doing a forensic search of the campervan? I hope I am interpreting this wrong.
I think it is MrsWatson. UnbelievableIs this the first they are doing a forensic search of the campervan? I hope I am interpreting this wrong.
From the link - posting the map with dates. I've been confused about the dates. I thought the mystery photographer was Nov 19, but this map suggests that he was with her on Nov 22, the same day that she was seen alone by the couple who were descending the summit.
Is it correct that her last contact with anyone was when she was with the mystery photographer where she decided to go with him to get a lift?
![]()
I totally agree that Occam tells us its likely she has had an accident somewhere and sadly not been found ...but ..and I'm not really one for "unlikely wild theories" at all...its not impossible the mystery hiker was around the area for days after she mentioned him
It does seem confusing from the map. However reading this link below I think it's possible that she had a lift from the mystery hiker on the 19th. It's likely that the she didn't send the photo to DC until the 22nd. Maybe the mystery hiker took the photo with his phone and sent it to her phone sometime later. That could explain why it seemed odd with the white lines around her and positions of her feet.From the link - posting the map with dates. I've been confused about the dates. I thought the mystery photographer was Nov 19, but this map suggests that he was with her on Nov 22, the same day that she was seen alone by the couple who were descending the summit.
Is it correct that her last contact with anyone was when she was with the mystery photographer where she decided to go with him to get a lift?
![]()
Is this the first they are doing a forensic search of the campervan? I hope I am interpreting this wrong.
From the link - posting the map with dates. I've been confused about the dates. I thought the mystery photographer was Nov 19, but this map suggests that he was with her on Nov 22, the same day that she was seen alone by the couple who were descending the summit.
Is it correct that her last contact with anyone was when she was with the mystery photographer where she decided to go with him to get a lift?
![]()
Perhaps some information they have discovered has led them to the van.
Is this the first they are doing a forensic search of the campervan? I hope I am interpreting this wrong.
I think it's possible. The familiarity was definitely there.I haven't read Esther's post, but, this comment
"He'd take me further up the valley so I could continue my planned tour to another refuge or back to the camper".
Is Esther saying the mystery fellow hiker gave her a lift more than once?
While no maps of the search areas have been published by the authorities (as far as I can find), there were search teams from both countries who deployed considerable resources (kudos to them) both ground and air for a week, so I think they did probably search quite a large area/the possible route after the Salvaguardia summit.
It's been two weeks with drones, helicopters, announcements, news so it would be difficult to be unaware of the searches in the area.
From the link - posting the map with dates. I've been confused about the dates. I thought the mystery photographer was Nov 19, but this map suggests that he was with her on Nov 22, the same day that she was seen alone by the couple who were descending the summit.
Is it correct that her last contact with anyone was when she was with the mystery photographer where she decided to go with him to get a lift?
![]()
It does seem confusing from the map. However reading this link below I think it's possible that she had a lift from the mystery hiker on the 19th. It's likely that the she didn't send the photo to DC until the 22nd.
It's good to have the information from their own words on Facebook. Trouble is many of us don't have (or want|) access to Facebook and rely on various published accounts and those, like yourself who watch Facebook. Plus a level of speculation, feelings about the people and actions involved. Otherwise Facebook/police becomes the only source allowed at this stage.In any case what the facts seem to be at this stage may yet turn out to be wrong.It is not likely, more it is fully impossible, as she published the photo, alongside with the description mentioning the mystery hiker, on November 19. It is there, clear as a day, on Dan&Esther FB. Can we stick to the facts, please?
It's good to have the information from their own words on Facebook. Trouble is many of us don't have (or want|) access to Facebook and rely on various published accounts and those, like yourself who watch Facebook. Plus a level of speculation, feelings about the people and actions involved. Otherwise Facebook/police becomes the only source allowed at this stage.In any case what the facts seem to be at this stage may yet turn out to be wrong.
It's been two weeks with drones, helicopters, announcements, news so it would be difficult to be unaware of the searches in the area.
That's assuming he is still hiking in the area of Pico del Salvaguardia. Pyrenees are huge, though, over 300 miles in lenght.