Spain - Sheila Barrero Fernandez, 22, Degaña, 25 Jan 2004

I know this thread hasn't been updated in some time, but Muy Curioso, if you see this, I have a question for you. You said you believe you have an explanation for the GSR on Borja's hand. What is it?
 
First, I want to apologize for the delay in the answer. I missed completely your post.

The most likely explanation for the GSR is a transfer, and the transfer could come from the same agents who initially investigated the case. Remember that it took twenty hours to discover that Sheila had been shot dead, and initially agentes believed that she had been killed with a stone or other blunt object.

Shortly after arriving, the police entered the back of the car, and probably touched the ceiling or the back of the headrest with the sleeves of their uniforms. They did not think that in those places there could be important information, so they should not take special precautions.

Those same agents interviewed all friends of Sheila (including Borja) the day of the crime, and surely received them when they went the police station the next day to make the GSR test.

Anyway, it is not possible to found GSR in a hand after 33 hours.
 
First, I want to apologize for the delay in the answer. I missed completely your post.

The most likely explanation for the GSR is a transfer, and the transfer could come from the same agents who initially investigated the case. Remember that it took twenty hours to discover that Sheila had been shot dead, and initially agentes believed that she had been killed with a stone or other blunt object.

Shortly after arriving, the police entered the back of the car, and probably touched the ceiling or the back of the headrest with the sleeves of their uniforms. They did not think that in those places there could be important information, so they should not take special precautions.

Those same agents interviewed all friends of Sheila (including Borja) the day of the crime, and surely received them when they went the police station the next day to make the GSR test.

Anyway, it is not possible to found GSR in a hand after 33 hours.
Any new development on this?

Sent from my LG-H831 using Tapatalk
 
I have a few questions-
Is there any possibility that Sheila was in the front passenger seat when shot, head turned to her left to allow that trajectory?
Were any suspects related to any of the investigators or to any person of power in the area?
Was it confirmed that Bjoras GF was not in the area at that time?
thanks!
 
Itr's been a while since I visited this thread. With a little distance, I now wonder why the car of the shooter would have followed Sheila. It has been more or less determined that there was hardly any time, since the two hunters were 3 minutes behind Sheila. Couldn't the other car (if there was one) have come from the opposite direction?

Also: Could the hunters have passed her car before the murder had happened?

IMHO the investigators should put all their info into an animation of sorts, an interactive map of the area that shows all known movements along the two roads. Makes me wonder for instance if Sheila's brother was the first one to notice her car.

I also wonder if Sheila was indeed the target, or if she happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. If someone had a reason for wanting to murder her, would the time (not planned, morning) and the location ( open, mist, winding road) be an obvious choice?

A Cold Case Team should take a fresh look!
 
La crueldad de la muerte de Sheila Barrero: la Guardia Civil da con el asesino pero el crimen duerme en los despachos

The cruel death of Sheila Barrero: the Guardia Civil has found the murderer but the crime remains asleep in the chambers

The Guardia Civil knows who killed young Sheila Barrero. They know this because, after mandatory tests carried out years after the crime, they have found traces of lead, barium, antimony and tin that indicate the very high probability that her ex-partner Borja, who was found with traces of these elements in his hands, was the murderer. If at first the excuse served that he had been hunting days before, there is no escape now.

This is what journalist Nacho Abad has said in El Confidencial, in a case in which the archive could have been opened years ago when the investigators provided strong arguments to start proceedings.

After three lustrums of that crime, which took place in Alto del Cerredo on the way to Degaña, the investigation leads to B.V.G. being the murderer. But now the Public Prosecutor's Office, according to the published information, is not acting in the planned direction.

It is said that the prosecutor did not attend the interrogations, did not listen to any of the experts and finally did not accuse the suspect.

A bullet separated Elías Barrero and Julia Fernández from their 22-year-old daughter Sheila on January 25, 2004. A student of Tourism in Gijón, the young woman also worked on weekends as a waitress in a bar in the town of Villablino in León.

It happened precisely at the pass of El Cerredo, on the border between both provinces, where her brother found her in her car. She was sitting in the driver's seat, shot in the back of the neck and half naked. According to the investigators the body had been moved and placed in a specific way.

Eleven years later, no one could be found who killed her. At first it was thought that the motive for the crime had been revenge, so numerous interviews were conducted among the victim's environment.

One of the main suspects was her ex-boyfriend, who tested positive for gunshot residue. But a legal chemical battle over whether it might be due to a transfer released the suspect after he was arrested.


BBM
 
Caso Sheila: La UCO da por resuelto el crimen; la familia no entiende que el asesino esté libre

For the Guardia Civil the case is solved, for the Government Delegate there is "very conclusive" evidence but the alleged killer had dinner yesterday at home, with his family, to the indignation of the mother and brother of the victim.

The death of Sheila Barrero in 2004, one of the most notorious unsolved murders in this country, has taken a turnaround in recent hours. The UCO, the unit of the Civil Guard that has solved cases like the crime of Javier Ardines or the disappearance of Diana Quer, points directly at B. V., the young woman's ex-boyfriend. After reopening the crime, scientific advances have predictably managed to unravel the case.

The judge of Cangas del Narcea reopened it at the end of 2018 and in January of this year lifted the secret of summary proceedings. With the reopening, the tests were to be subjected to new analyses in the Criminalistics laboratories of the Guardia Civil. In the first place also appears Sheila's family, her mother Julia and her siblings Monica and Elias, who have fought since the first day to find the culprit. The prosecution will assess whether it accuses Sheila's ex-boyfriend. These have been the three keys that have meant a total turn of a crime that shook Asturias.

Sheila Barrero was killed by a bullet in the back of the head. The murderer was located in the back seat of the car and, with his right hand, pulled the trigger of a small caliber pistol, a 6.35. That is why initially it was thought that Sheila had died of a head trauma. Hours later, the autopsy revealed that her death was due to a barrel-touch shot, that the projectile had passed through the nape of the neck, that it had bounced off the window of the car and had fallen on the floor as a result of the low power of the 6.35 mm pistol. The main suspect, B.V., argued from the first minute to the investigators that he had been hunting and that he was going to test positive in the examination for residues. That's how it was. However, according to the new UCO report, scientific progress has caused a turnaround. While traces of lead, tin, barium and also antimony were found on B. V.'s hand similar to those of the bullet, on the right sleeve of the jacket that B. V. gave to the investigators days after the crime, they now also found traces of lead, barium, antimony and tin. Let's remember that B.V.'s alibi was based on the fact that he had gone hunting a few days earlier and that he had used a metal cartridge gun.

The UCO maintains that there were only remains of a single shot (in the hunt more than one is made) and that "no hunting ammunition has tin in its composition." This detail is crucial.


In the back seat of the Peugeot 206 that Sheila was driving, a blue cotton fibre was found in a scarf. That fiber was compared to the jacket of B.V. and the material was the same. But it was determined that it could also have belonged to another person and that one could not accuse someone for that reason alone. The new analyses launched by the OCO have determined that the fibre belongs to Sheila's ex-boyfriend. That the wear and characteristics of the fiber coincide specifically with the jacket of B.V.

Sheila's ex-boyfriend's parents testified in their day that B.V. had not been out all night from home. Investigators now doubt that testimony and even question whether the parents were at home at all that weekend or might have been playing golf.

The UCO also points to other contradictions. A month after the crime, B.V. went to the hospital because he was suffering from insomnia and nerves, and there he blamed the Guardia Civil for pressuring him. He later changed his version and attributed his nervous problems to his repeated failure to fail the driving test. B.V. claimed that he had taken six unsuccessful tests. The Guardia Civil investigated the fact and came to a conclusion: he had only taken two examinations, and had done so a year before his visit to the hospital. A new incongruity.


BBM
 
It was the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, and I could not help thinking of Sheila Barrero, who is still waiting for justice, a justice that is long overdue.

Caso Sheila Barrero, un callejón sin salida

A crime in the fog, in the middle of a mountain pass between Asturias and León, that has remained a mystery for over 17 years. The murder of 22-year-old Sheila Barrero, shot once in the back of the head, as if by execution, on the night of 25 January 2004, is a thorn in the side of a whole judicial system and has driven a family desperate for justice to the point of exhaustion.

The case has been dismissed twice, always freeing the same suspect, a friend of Sheila's, to whom the scant, insidiously rickety evidence obtained by the Guardia Civil is pointing. The accumulation of errors has finally brought this case to what appears to be a dead end.

"We are desperate because it has been so many years, and we are living a mourning that we have not yet closed," according to Sheila's sister, Monica Barrero. The family is also concerned about another issue: "There is a legal time limit for the statute of limitations and it is running out. This is taking its toll, it suffocates you, you wonder if you could have done more". The point is that they do believe that the prosecutor's office and the judges could have done more. They are so disappointed with the senior prosecutor that they are going to file a complaint against her with the Attorney General of the State.

To talk about Sheila Barrero is to enter into a labyrinth with no way out, the typical case that Netflix is producing a series of several seasons. It is necessary to go back 17 years, to try to embody a young woman who, with the passage of time, has become sadly disfigured. It is impossible to bring out her voice, her gestures. If there is one thing that those who knew her say about Sheila Barrero, it is that she was a good student and a hard-working young woman, full of vitality and eager to take on the world. She had studied tourism and worked in a travel agency in Gijón from Monday to Friday. At weekends, in the Peugeot 206 that her father had bought her, she returned to her village, Degaña, to be near her family and to supplement her salary by working as a waitress in the Joe Team pub in the nearby town of Villablino, in León.

On Saturday 24 January 2004, she had gone to work at the pub as she did every weekend. At around seven o'clock on Sunday morning, the pub closed, but the young woman went to have a drink with her colleagues in a nearby bar, the Guei. She didn't stay long, because she was very tired. At about eight o'clock, the young woman decided to return to Degaña, separated from Villablino by the Cerredo pass. Her work colleagues escorted her in their car to the crossroads at Caboalles de Abajo, where the young woman said goodbye to them and headed up the mountain pass.

It was on this climb, at the Alto de la Collada recreational area, that the crime took place. Someone (one person, two at most) stopped Sheila's car by crossing her vehicle in the middle of the road, something that was observed by a group of hunters who passed by the area shortly afterwards, without imagining what was happening. Then, whoever stopped Sheila's car climbed into the back seat of the Peugeot 206 and shot the young woman in the back of the head with a 6.5 calibre pistol.

The bullet went through the girl's head, but exited with so little force that it ricocheted off the front window of the vehicle and fell to the ground. It was half past eight in the morning. A cold-blooded, dispassionate crime, some have even thought it was professional, given the cleanliness with which it was carried out. Sheila's sister, Monica, has even speculated that someone threatened her sister with a gun in the back and fired a shot with totally unintended consequences.

The killer then moved the body to the passenger seat, drove the Peugeot 206 off the road, parked it in the recreation area, returned the now lifeless body to the driver's seat and drove off in his own vehicle. There was no sexual assault or any other violence, except for the shooting. There are even those, like the criminologist Vicente Garrido, who have claimed that the woman's body was treated with the utmost respect and delicacy. The body would be discovered a few hours later, and the mistakes that have caused this case to stall would begin to occur. The bullet left injuries so imperceptible at first glance that the coroner initially thought it was a traffic accident. It was only later, on the autopsy table, that he discovered that the young woman had been shot dead. This slowed down the action of the Guardia Civil, who ended up finding, one day late, the bullet that had killed the young woman.

The officers looked at the people who had had contact with her the day before and carried out a paraffin test on almost ten friends, acquaintances and relatives. Thirty-three hours had already passed since the crime. They discovered that at least three of them had fired shots in the previous days, something not so unusual in this area bordering Asturias and León, with a dense forest and a long hunting tradition. But in the right hand of one of them, Borja Vidal, who was 19 years old at the time, they found "lead, antimony and barium-based particles, as well as tin", which according to the Guardia Civil had originated from the detonation of a trigger similar to that of the bullet found in the car.

The agents also discovered that Vidal and Sheila had had a relationship in the past. According to one hypothesis, the young man had resumed his relationship with a former girlfriend and felt pressured by Sheila, who did want to continue with him. In addition, a textile fibre was found in the back seats of Sheila's car attached to a scarf. The fibre was determined to be from one of Vidal's jackets. With this evidence, the agents proceeded to arrest the young man, six months after the crime, and presented him before the judge of Cangas del Narcea, Julio Martínez Zahonero.

"With much less, he would have gone to trial", says Mónica Barrero. However, something went wrong. Judge Zahonero ended up closing the case in October 2007 when he considered that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute the only person under investigation. The experts pointed out that the particles found in Borja Vidal's hand could be due to a transfer. Nor was it so strange to find a particle belonging to a garment belonging to the young man, given that, as he stated, he had been inside that car. The key piece of information, however, was the statement of the suspect's parents, who assured that, on the day of the crime, Borja had spent the night at home. It was not possible to go any further. This first dismissal was a blow to the family of Sheila Barrero. They received growing public support, given that the justice system had not managed to find the culprit of the crime.


BBM
 
Caso Sheila Barrero, un callejón sin salida


bc5830ff-4080-4a69-97a7-2fc34f7d14b3_16-9-aspect-ratio_default_0.jpg


The case was reopened in 2015, with the arrival of a new judge and the possibility that a new analysis of the evidence found through new scientific advances could shed light on the crime.

The Guardia Civil's Central Operational Unit re-evaluated the case, bringing in profiling specialists, who pointed to the possibility that Sheila Barrero and Borja Vidal had a secret relationship unknown to everyone. The agents provided the testimony of a person who claimed that Borja's parents had been away from Villablino playing golf the weekend of the crime, so they could not know if their son had been at home that night. The experts again reiterated that the physical evidence pointed to Borja Vidal. To no avail. The prosecution considered that no new evidence had been provided with respect to 2007 and that it could not bring a prosecution with so little evidence. The judge in Cangas del Narcea was forced to dismiss the case for the second time, to the dismay of the family.

"Someone doesn't want this to go to trial," Sheila's sister believes. She states that they are going to file a complaint against the Superior Prosecutor of Asturias, Esther Fernández, who ~ she assures ~ treated the family "like criminals" when they met with her. "Justice must be done for Sheila, by all means. The public prosecutor's office has shown hatred towards the family. We feel mistreated by her, she is not doing her job," Mónica Barrero continues.

Almost 18 years later, Sheila Barrero's case is still open, with no indication of where it might go to prevent it from going unpunished.


BBM
 
Apparently, there have been developments in the murder of Sheila Barrero. To my surprise I see that I did not follow this case for years, my last posting dates from 2021 andI haven't found out what happened between then and now.

The news, from january 2020 and allegedly updated in january 2025, though it remains unclear what the update is:

El Juzgado cierra provisionalmente la causa por el crimen de Sheila Barrero

The court provisionally closes the case for the crime of Sheila Barrero.

Thereby the court follows the position of the Public Prosecutor's Office, which considers that the new proceedings do not allow a formal accusation to be made against the only person under investigation.


The magistrate of the Court of First Instance of Cangas del Narcéa has decreed the provisional dismissal of the case investigating the murder of Sheila Barrero - perpetrated in January 2004 in Alto de la Collada - due to lack of evidence against the only person under investigation. The magistrate thus follows the position of the Public Prosecutor's Office, which requested this measure as it considers that the new evidence that has been gathered does not allow a formal accusation against her ex-boyfriend B.V. to be made.

As the judge concludes, ‘from the investigative proceedings carried out, it has not been possible to locate the accused, nor any other person in Sheila Barrero's vehicle on the morning of her murder’. The court also understands that the presence of a fibre from the suspect's jacket on a scarf placed on the back seats of the vehicle ‘does not allow us to place him between 08:15 and 10:00 hours in the young woman's vehicle, given that, according to several witnesses, he had been inside it on several occasions, and the fibre could have been left there on any of these other previous occasions’.

With regard to the alibi of the ex-boyfriend, the Court points out that it is still valid as ‘there is no witness who places him outside the family home at the time of the crime, nor has the version provided by his parents that the night of 24 to 25 January 2004 the accused did not leave the family home been disproved’. It is also added that the fact that B.V. knew the victim's routines and the geographical environment where she was murdered ‘cannot be taken as evidence of criminality’.

The magistrate also states that ‘there are no biological traces of the victim on the clothes voluntarily handed over by the accused. It is surprising that there are non-specific gunshot residues on the investigated person's jacket, but nevertheless, no traces of blood of the murdered young woman were found, despite the fact that, according to the UCO's Reconstruction Report, the perpetrator had moved the victim's body from the driver's seat to the passenger seat and then back to the driver's seat. For this reason, the non-specific gunshot residues on the suspect's jacket cannot be conclusive, especially as the suspect was a known hunter. Nor were any traces of blood or gunshot residue found in the various vehicles at his disposal. There are no biological remains of the suspect in the vehicle of the deceased girl, nor on her body’.

Despite the fact that the UCO considered two different motives, the ruling considers that the motive for the crime remains unknown to this day and points out several confusions, errors in the identification of possible evidence and the failure to take other evidence or statements that were not taken in the first hours after the body was found.

The magistrate also explains that ‘the weapon with which the crime was committed has not been located, nor has it been possible to prove that the person under investigation had access to a short firearm with such characteristics. And finally, in relation to the gunshot residue detected on the hand of the only person who was investigated for the crime, as has been detailed, although the technicians consider the coincidence of the residue on the shell casing and on the right hand of the investigated person to be unusual and highly distinctive, the different experts do not agree on the length of time the particles have been present and a transfer from another surface cannot be ruled out’.

Therefore, the ruling, which is not final and can be appealed, concludes that ‘there is currently no evidence, even circumstantial evidence, that objectively and reasonably allows the case to be directed against a specific person or persons’. As the dismissal is provisional, the proceedings can only be reopened against the person under investigation or against any other person in the event that a new indication or sufficient evidence arises that would make it advisable to withdraw the dismissal.

BBM

This ruling follows the ruling of 2007 by another judge.

La jueza sobresee el crimen de Sheila por falta de pruebas concluyentes

Following the ruling, the family of Sheila Barrero has accused the Public Prosecutor's Office of ineptitude and lack of professionalism. They believe that there is no real will on the part of the justice system to resolve the case and recognise that the investigation was not carried out properly, but they believe that there is a basis for appeal.
 
I asked GROK about the statute of limitations in Sheila's case:

According to GROK:

You are talking about the case of Sheila Barrero from Degaña, who was murdered in 2004, and asking whether a case like this can still be time-barred in Spain. Let's look at this step by step, with a focus on the statutes of limitation in Spain and how they apply to her case.

In Spain, the statute of limitations for criminal cases is governed by Spanish criminal law, specifically the Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal and the Código Penal. For murder cases, such as that of Sheila Barrero, a 20-year limitation period has long applied to very serious crimes (delitos graves) carrying a sentence of more than 15 years. This meant that the ability to prosecute an offender would expire after 20 years, unless the statute of limitations was interrupted or suspended by certain legal actions, such as an ongoing investigation or a formal indictment.

In the case of Sheila Barrero, she was murdered on 25 January 2004. Without interruption or suspension of the statute of limitations, the case would theoretically expire on 25 January 2024, exactly 20 years later. This is also what received a lot of media attention in 2024: Sheila's family spoke out at a commemoration on 25 January 2024, stressing that they wanted to prevent the case from expiring without a trial. Mónica Barrero, Sheila's sister, and her brother Elías indicated that they continued to fight for justice, also because they believed there was sufficient evidence (such as gunshot residue on the hands of the suspect, Borja V.) to warrant a trial.

Now to your question: is a statute of limitations still possible in Spain for this kind of case? There has been an important development. In 2015, Spain changed the statute of limitations for serious crimes such as murder. A change in the law in the Código Penal (Article 131) made murder (asesinato) statute-barred, meaning that there is no longer a statute of limitations for murder cases occurring after this change in the law. However, pre-2015 cases, such as Sheila's, are subject to a transitional regime. The limitation period that applied at the time of the crime (20 years in this case) continues to apply unless legal action has been taken that has interrupted the limitation period. In Sheila's case, the statute of limitations has been interrupted several times by reopening the investigation (e.g. in 2015) and by the family's efforts to keep the case active. This means that although technically the case could have been time-barred in 2024, the family's legal actions and reopenings have ensured that the case is still open.

At this time, April 2025, I can confirm that Sheila Barrero's case is not yet definitively time-barred, as the family and their lawyers continue to push for a trial.
Moreover, since the 2015 change in the law, new murder cases in Spain are no longer time-barred, which is an important step to ensure justice in future cases. However, for older cases like Sheila's, it remains a battle against time, depending on how the statute of limitations is legally interpreted and whether new evidence or proceedings are launched.

It is notable, however, that Spanish law has become stricter on this point, probably under pressure from public outrage over unsolved cases like Sheila's. Critics of the old system felt it was unfair that serious crimes could be time-barred, potentially letting offenders off the hook. On the other hand, one might question whether completely abolishing statutes of limitation is fair in all cases, especially if evidence becomes less reliable after decades. In Sheila's case, however, the family seems determined not to let the case rest, and the legal action they have taken has effectively stopped the statute of limitations.

BBM
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
130
Guests online
5,738
Total visitors
5,868

Forum statistics

Threads
621,803
Messages
18,438,765
Members
239,765
Latest member
TSC
Back
Top