State rests rebuttal case- thread #164

Status
Not open for further replies.
They could of just let the state present their case, put Jodi on the stand, pulled her off and said "see, nutty as a fruit cake" and they may have had a shot!

I would rather she be on death row.
 
Donovan wont be allowed to sell them anymore. The rightfull owner may demand the money she made. They wont be pleased when they tind out who is doing this.

Isn't Donavan on probation? Copyright is a FEDERAL civil issue, not state.

Wouldn't that be hilarious!
 
They could of just let the state present their case, put Jodi on the stand, pulled her off and said "see, nutty as a fruit cake" and they may have had a shot!

I T A !!!!!

Completely delusional. She could have used a litany of defense strategies, but her personality and ego will not allow her to concede that she is a bad person.

Using another defense would force her to take responsibility, and she simply cannot do that. She even had 5 years to come up with a good story and couldn't do THAT!
 
I have an out of town conference on Thur/Fri May 8th and 9th. I will be in my car 2 hrs each day. Is the consensus this will be over/verdict in by then? If not, I wonder if I should splurge for a 1 month Sirius subscription (I have Sirius installed but didn't renew it when my free subscription terminated).
 
Ta da! The closing

http://youtu.be/39cjZz78OkA

THREE times AV told Juan Martinez that Jodi told her she walked in on Travis looking at 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 on the computer.
http://youtu.be/tgcy9sxBH38?t=7m48s

No 🤬🤬🤬🤬, no abuse....ALL LIES Just as JM mopped the floor with ALV, he will do so, with ease, with the next guy, her longtime friend.

What's interesting about ALV's testimony that she "assumed" Travis was looking at 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 on the computer is the following: we all know, after watching JA on the stand for 18+ days, that she would not have said something fairly non-specific like "Travis was looking at 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 of little boys." JA is very descriptive and would have described the incident like she did on the stand -- walking into the bedroom, he's on the bed, has photos, one flutters to the floor. There is no way ALV was left with so little information about this ALLEGED turning point in JA's and Travis' relationship that she had to make assumptions. Also, if she is so technologically ignorant as she claims, it seems to me she would have assumed he was looking at magazines.
 
Unfortunately for Jodi, insanity has nothing to do with knowing right from wrong and if you aren't 'wrong' in spilling someone's blood all over a bathroom, you won't try to clean it up!!

Now this with the "art"....these criminals who just think they are sooo smart. Funny how it ends up they're the ones who usually end up in prison.

I guess I'm glad I'm so "dumb"!!

:scared::facepalm::rockon::banghead:
 
yes, i find it curious too,, I don't understand why he would start his cross with this, im confused, what point was he trying to make, and specifically, what is your theory or the possible motive to this strategy as for starting with this picture of her dumb sister???

I think my curiosity is related to JM's emphasis on the time in the photo and on the Walmart receipt... I guess I will just have to wait to his closing argument to have it explained....
 
Oh god. I hope there is a time limit.

oh it will be all "oh i will miss out on so much" BS

travis family get impact statements at sentencing right?

imo they will give the jury their DP decision
 
According to Abe Abohadi: she went on one date with him and remembered the exact drink he ordered. She remembers everything about that killing, I'd bet on it. Liar is what she is.
And probably relives it for her pleasure..IMO
 
I have an out of town conference on Thur/Fri May 8th and 9th. I will be in my car 2 hrs each day. Is the consensus this will be over/verdict in by then? If not, I wonder if I should splurge for a 1 month Sirius subscription (I have Sirius installed but didn't renew it when my free subscription terminated).

IF and that is one big IF, the judge stands firm on her "we stay until the witness is done" on Wednesday than I think we will have a verdict by then, at least on guilt.
 
Make me happy please tell me Dior will sue Jodi or tell her she can't sell any art basedon their copyrighted images!? Will they even bother to react?
 
I have an out of town conference on Thur/Fri May 8th and 9th. I will be in my car 2 hrs each day. Is the consensus this will be over/verdict in by then? If not, I wonder if I should splurge for a 1 month Sirius subscription (I have Sirius installed but didn't renew it when my free subscription terminated).

If I understand correctly, I believe that deliberations go into Friday? Myself, I will be watching the Wild About Trials streaming on my smartphone. If traveling, I will hook it through my car stereo via Bluetooth. When technology works, it's awesome!!
 
If I understand correctly, I believe that deliberations go into Friday? Myself, I will be watching the Wild About Trials streaming on my smartphone. If traveling, I will hook it through my car stereo via Bluetooth. When technology works, it's awesome!!


Geeezzzzz, I am so behind the times.
 
If I understand correctly, I believe that deliberations go into Friday? Myself, I will be watching the Wild About Trials streaming on my smartphone. If traveling, I will hook it through my car stereo via Bluetooth. When technology works, it's awesome!!

Brownrice is talking about the week after. Final arguments will be Thursday and Friday. I agree technology is awesome though!

BR - There could well be a verdict by Thursday 8th.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
225
Guests online
469
Total visitors
694

Forum statistics

Threads
625,755
Messages
18,509,312
Members
240,838
Latest member
MNigh_ShyamaLADD
Back
Top