State rests rebuttal case - thread #169

[gauntlet]

So nice to see Travis's side looking so happy. If noone else grabs the screen shots I'll do it later. Happiness and support in numbers.

 

[Plumeria5]

Can I just repost this?? It's just too lovely.

:heartbeat:

:heartbeat::heartbeat::heartbeat::heartbeat:

 

[scorpio24]

I just saw on Twitter that Dr. Horn is in the HOUSE!

 

[Softail]

Yeah, a child custody case where you did not fully investigate both sides.. Just like ALV! :gavel:

 

[TigerBalm]

I'm so sick of this "WE" testimony... that mouse in his pocket should run as fast as it can!

:sigh:

 

[EquallyDivided]

I soooooooo just decided to put off the dishes because my USB speaker for my nook is not charged....:blushing:

Put it in a large glass bowl, it amplifies the sound without an external speaker.

 

[Sweetiemom]

Dr is goinna try and weasel out of the complaints about him.

 

[Linda7NJ]

The judge was a big meanie because this guy was critical of the judges buddies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[MandyLeigh]

Sorry but I HAD to do this. If it offends anyone I apologize I tried not to go into detail what exactly the photos were but this really ticked me off..

One taken right after the other. Just moments between.

I will put a MOO here just to play it safe.
It offended me greatly, it was obvious what she was doing.

 

[Mrs G Norris]

OH whaaaaaaaaaahhhh I don't wanna redirect

 

[elementary]

KPHO twitter is reporting still one more defense witness to go!

ETA: They were mistaken. Final witness is for PROSECUTION.

 

[gauntlet]

The sisters and a lady who you could follow to the exit if there's a blackout!

 

[Curious Me]

Can I just repost this?? It's just too lovely.

:heartbeat:

I like to think Travis is there in the courtroom looking lovingly at all his family and friends.

 

[shiloh42]

aw crap lost az central....

 

[wenwe4]

you ready? JW to Dr.

O'roark case . . judge said you were hired gun . . . paid to say to fit what is wanted from them . . .
how you define it - yes one of the ways to define it

is that how you define the case
child custody case wihith a pbatered woman - at least 2 kids we dealt with . . whole battery of test and records - clear the children and the woman had been abused= . . testified about our eval and tried to . . major flaws in the experts done the reports in the court - appointed by the court . . worked frequently with that judge . . . they obviously used inappropriate tests neuro-psych tests . .

children who did not want to live with teh father . . . he didn't see opinion for quite some time - 2 things happened . . .

one thing
objection
sustaiend
may we approach?

 

[Arishia]

Yeah, a child custody case where you did not fully investigate both sides.. Just like ALV! :gavel:

Just like Samuels, I think.

 

[ShadyLady]

Wilmot sure does like having her way on every little detail.....

 

[Irving]

Again with the approach.

Good grief.

 

[Linda7NJ]

Yeah, a child custody case where you did not fully investigate both sides.. Just like ALV! :gavel:

Which is fair IMO ... If you're evaluating the children.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[queen9600]

OMG what part of 'sustained" does JW NOT get?