State rests rebuttal case - thread #169

[Curious Me]

Is Jodi's Grandmother still there?

 

[Truth Detector]

Pulling for you and Travis, Samantha​

 

[Cherry]

JW thinks that Juan opened a Door??

 

[josie1986]

i think juan is just objecting now to get under willmotts skin :innocent:

 

[corundogs]

DAMN! I just realized I am gonna miss American Idol tonight...will have to DVR it, but I normally post with another group on another forum that makes it better.

Oh well...somehow, this is more important!

 

[Boodles]

Who thinks closings start tomorrow? Not me...

 

[AnonymousD]

Oh tell me the jury just saw jw!!!

 

[rose222]

Did you guys see Willmott close her eyes like she can't stand the objections?! The NERVE when she does it all the time!

 

[tlcya]

interesting, in the French case he was limited to testifying about just his own area of expertise.

HOW NOVEL AN IDEA! TAKING NOTES JUDGE?

sheesh, sorry for yelling but boy we sure could have used more of that in THIS trial MOO

 

[websurfer]

What is Jodi doing with that pencil under the table? her hands moving around.

you know how some people write I WAS HERE and the date under furniture?:twocents:

 

[Arishia]

Go Juan. Give Willmott a dose of her own medicine.

 

[SassyMom]

Wild says that Dr. Horn is in the building.

 

[Mrs G Norris]

Oooh cranky ..

 

[elementary]

one more DEFENSE witness??? No way. Right? Right?

For PROSECUTION. They corrected it.

 

[EquallyDivided]

WHOA! Talk about some immature body language! Didn't DeMarte say JODI was immature?

 

[gloomy]

 

[Melanie]

dangit, why do I have 2 grown men who want dinner! I missed most of JM's testimony, only to come back to JW. Dinner is all prepped and I told em "it's too early to eat" (I'm on the west coast).

So how late do you think we'll be here tonight. Will Jodi get her power bar?

Ridic!

MOO

Mel

 

[lil_buddy]

lol @ jw's exasperation.
what's that expression abt dishing it out

 

[JusticeJunkie]

How ya like it willmott?

 

[wenwe4]

clark case you gave an affidavit . . limited scope of what you wer basing . . you didn't have the time to review to have a more comprehensive affidavit . .

no i said i only had time to do x amount . . what the limits . . did not have the time . . not complete based on hearsay - not going to allow it . . nothin on my integrity . . . nothing with integrity

there was a french case . . the name was French

testimony was excluded?
no this was a kidnapping case . . woman and child abused - he was not involved . . she took her child and ran away . . he was asked about domestic violence - judge said no you can't answer that part of it.

the appellate court indicated his credentials . . everything he knew based upon his expertise.

one particular area - that is up to the jury to decide
nothing to do with credentials . . great credentials and credibitiy.
yes judge actually said . .
objection- sustained

court note you had excellent credentials
yes
how
indi catec
objection (number 387th in the last 30 seconds)

approach please

(TG!)