- Joined
- Oct 8, 2004
- Messages
- 16,856
- Reaction score
- 58,910
I don't disagree. But I before cross, I think many believed we'd been presented with our "smoking gun." If the State has one, they've yet to bring it.
The State is not yet finished either.
I don't disagree. But I before cross, I think many believed we'd been presented with our "smoking gun." If the State has one, they've yet to bring it.
I HOPE they're not done with her. I want them to ask her about when she and Nancy were painting!
fran
I guess we'll find out when the defense gets the case. Since you have never actually met NC, I find it hard to believe with 100% certainty that those pictures don't exist.
I guess we'll find out when the defense gets the case. Since you have never actually met NC, I find it hard to believe with 100% certainty that those pictures don't exist.
Scott Peterson never hit or harmed Laci...until he killed her and their unborn son.
A history of abuse is not the only requirement (or even necessarily a requirement) for spousal homicide.
I'm pretty sure the state would of asked her specifically about that if that was the case.
Scott Peterson never hit or harmed Laci...until he killed her and their unborn son.
A history of abuse is not the only requirement (or even necessarily a requirement) for spousal homicide.
It didn't rule it out. It didn't prove. It basically made it irrelevant.
It didn't rule it out. It didn't prove. It basically made it irrelevant.
True...that is why it won't be a question by the defense.
Thank your stars that you weren't taking chemistry at NCSU. Nearly killed me. Toughest C I have ever made.Oh, how I loved that dayam C.
Like you, I still have scars!
True...that is why it won't be a question by the defense.
As you said..no 100% discounting possibility of having picture without necklace..However..Defense posted a picture of Nancy sans necklace on their website in that green dress...then got shown as being doctored to delete that necklace by the person who actually took that picture...So I have to say, IF indeed they have one..why didnt they use that on their website??..
Once again...we have to wait and see :waitasec:
K&B played their hand on this already. They put the one picture they thought showed Nancy not wearing her necklace ON THEIR WEBSITE to try to make an 'aha!' moment to the public. Turns out the photo was blurry and from far away, and Nancy *was* wearing the necklace at that very party.
They mentioned in opening statements that there are pictures (plural) of it. Again, I'd like to see what the defense presents on this.