State v Bradley Cooper 04-15-2011

[LyndyLoo]

Could someone clearify for me the fact Kurtz is dusting up about is this witness claiming to have seen Nancy jogging...IS that same witness who also confessed she wasnt wearing her glasses?...(just a little tid bit D mentioned)

 

[Just the Fax]

He could have been using wireless and leaning up in the bed. He also could have been using his phone to connect to the network.

Thanks!

You finally admitted he lied and was on the computer when he said he was sleeping :great:

 

[less0305]

The post I was replying to indicated that he was out and stopped to vaccumn the car, I surmised that would mean a car wash. I also don't know a shop vac that is that good that it removes all trace evidence, I have never been able to find a good one with that good suction. I want to know which one they have if it is that good, I want one to use routinely.

I don't care if he ate the hair and threads with his teeth - the fact remains his trunk was immaculate in an otherwise messy car. The ONLY spot on that acre lot/house that was clean at all. He might have tongue licked all the evidence out of that car for all we know - it was done, one way or the other. HE - Brad himself - stated HE cleaned the trunk.

 

[Danielle59]

Originally Posted by gritguy
If Stubbs talked to LEO or a DA before the depo and therefore had an indication of certain facts or circumstances surrounding the murder, and asks BC about them, and with lawyers present he chooses to forge ahead with statements that prove to be lies, he is excused exactly how?

It does not excuse his lies, but I'm bothered (even if no one else is) of the power of the state (ie Cary PD) providing evidence and information, if true, to one side in the custody case, and not the other.

If for not other reason it appears that the state had made its mind up of the absolute guilt of the defendant in the Sept./Oct 2008 time frame BEFORE all evidence was in.

Yes, he may be guilty of murder(and I say may only because both side have not yet completed presenting evidence), but presumed actions by the state, if the defense can prove it, such as providing information to a civil attorney Stubbs that early in the discovery process, lends too much fodder to the defense argument of a "rush to judgment", and the state planting possibly incriminating evidence or destroying exculpatory evidence.

None of this has been shown or proven by the defense. But they are laying the foundation of this.

Again this may be the only stuff for the defense to hang there hat on, and it's a slim reed at best.........

I agree with you and brought up something very similar myself. There is something not kosher about that.

 

[Tipstaff]

"Tongue Licked" saving for future use!

 

[Lori59]

I don't care if he ate the hair and threads with his teeth - the fact remains his trunk was immaculate in an otherwise messy car. The ONLY spot on that acre lot/house that was clean at all. He might have tongue licked all the evidence out of that car for all we know - it was done, one way or the other. HE - Brad himself - stated HE cleaned the trunk.

:floorlaugh:

 

[CrimeAddict]

I don't care if he ate the hair and threads with his teeth - the fact remains his trunk was immaculate in an otherwise messy car. The ONLY spot on that acre lot/house that was clean at all. He might have tongue licked all the evidence out of that car for all we know - it was done, one way or the other. HE - Brad himself - stated HE cleaned the trunk.

Tongue licked.

:laugh:

 

[NCEast]

Court recessed til Monday morning.
What a day!

 

[jrb0124]

He erased his samsung...that's where the proof was
Faking an alibi is common.
They will see right through it, cause they will use common sense.

There was NO log/trace/data that BC initated a remote call. NONE. PG testified to this. If BC had initiated a remote call he could NOT remove the trace, even if he vaporized the Samsung.

There was NO forensic computer evidence that BC pre-programmed a remote call. pros own computer forensics tesified to this specifically. You do think the pros would have made that the first "smoking gun" of the trial if they could no?

Either: NC made the call (BC innocent), or one of his D's did i.e. redial or direct dial (BC guilty).

 

[Just the Fax]

Well, too late Judge.
I'm pretty sure the jury already formed opinions on this case and it doesn't look good for Brad

 

[BrownRice]

He was confident with prosecution, but agressive with Kurtz. It can happen when you don't know the questions, and you don't like being questioned about what you believe even though it might not be in your notes or you might not be able to prove it. IMO

I think it also goes to the known adversarial relationships between cops and defense attys.

 

[Palomine]

The post I was replying to indicated that he was out and stopped to vaccumn the car, I surmised that would mean a car wash. I also don't know a shop vac that is that good that it removes all trace evidence, I have never been able to find a good one with that good suction. I want to know which one they have if it is that good, I want one to use routinely.

its amazing how we all watch the same trial and come up with different evidence, didn't he say he cleaned the car out at the home

 

[Just the Fax]

There was NO log/trace/data that BC initated a remote call. NONE. PG testified to this. If BC had initiated a remote call he could NOT remove the trace, even if he vaporized the Samsung.

There was NO forensic computer evidence that BC pre-programmed a remote call. pros own computer forensics tesified to this specifically. You do think the pros would have made that the first "smoking gun" of the trial if they could no?

Either: NC made the call (BC innocent), or one of his D's did i.e. redial or direct dial (BC guilty).

What part of an erased Samsung smartphone is so hard for you to understand?
That is a fact.

 

[less0305]

Shue, I'm glad today is over with! I'm tired. All this assistance in the courtroom is wearing me out!!

Seriously though, I feel like I was on that stand all day! Can you imagine how DD and the prosecution and jurors feel at the end of the day??!!! Can you even imagine how they go home and try to put this out of their mind while they try to get some rest and relaxation? :goldstar::goldstar::goldstar::goldstar: They get gold stars from me for hanging in there, being tough, providing justice!

 

[NCEast]

its amazing how we all watch the same trial and come up with different evidence, didn't he say he cleaned the car out at the home

I've been thinking, for some reason or another, that his trunk was vacuumed at home too.

 

[borndem]

And, has the other defense attorney just given up? Sorry, can't think of his name. This is hard to watch.....DD is playing a great game of chess. Loved when he said I didn't say you with held information, I was just perplexed that if had information why you wouldn't give it to us..and I also was perplexed about the website......something to that matter.

This ain't Det. D's first rodeo, either.

I'll bet Det. McDreamy is loving this! Along with many of his buds, and probably the CPD Chief as well.

And Kurtz needs to pedal easy -- the judge's fuse is getting shorter and shorter. I'm sure Judge G. is just hearing the sand pour thru the hourglass, and hearing a constant tick, tock, tick, tock. The jurors are writing their wills...

 

[Danielle59]

http://www.athlinks.com/photo/6471/112191/Ironman-Arizona-2007.aspx

He really does have a HUGE head.

 

[Palomine]

Well, to late Judge.
I'm pretty sure the jury already formed opinions on this case and it doesn't look good for Brad

Really how could they sit there day after day and not form an opinion???

 

[NCEast]

Shue, I'm glad today is over with! I'm tired. All this assistance in the courtroom is wearing me out!!

Seriously though, I feel like I was on that stand all day! Can you imagine how DD and the prosecution and jurors feel at the end of the day??!!! Can you even imagine how they go home and try to put this out of their mind while they try to get some rest and relaxation? :goldstar::goldstar::goldstar::goldstar: They get gold stars from me for hanging in there, being tough, providing justice!

I'm worn out as well. And you know what, I don't think they are able to go home at 5:00....I have a feeling both sides go back to their offices or somewhere and rehash each day's testimony and prepare for the next day. I really admire their stamina. Both sides even.

 

[Palomine]

wral WRAL NEWS in NC
The Brad #CooperTrial wraps up for the day. Testimony continues at 9:30 a.m. Monday. Lead detective Daniels will be back on the stand.