State v Bradley Cooper 04-19-2011

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #421
No, the Cisco security guy may have cost himself his own job. It baffles me that anyone would do this.

didn't the cisco security guy that did testify say he didn't work at cisco anymore so maybe he did get terminated
 
  • #422
Witness can not provide steps or even tell the court how he found evidence of tampering? Witness did not write anything down.

I think Pros is right, this witness IS an expert in security, not forensics and that is a problem with calling him an expert in that area.

Kelly
 
  • #423
As much as I would like to hear what Mr. Ward has to say, Boz is doing brilliantly right now.
 
  • #424
What is going on here? Doesn't the defense have the budget to hire a proper expert witness?
 
  • #425
It is times like this I HATE living near Cisco. The buffering is outrageous.
 
  • #426
  • #427
Preach it, Boz, preach it!
 
  • #428
You'd think if he was in the hot seat and actually did buy it, he would have said, I bought it. He said he "got" it when he worked at cisco.

And how many years have passed since he "aquired" this equipment from Cisco? How far has technology advanced in the interim?

Hope he swings by Cisco and returns the antiquated gear.
 
  • #429
"he does know the training - that he has no training" :floorlaugh:
 
  • #430
Judge will not allow him to be considered an expert, Kurtz will argue that he doesn't know how the FBI got their evidence.
 
  • #431
I'll admit, if he allows him as an expert, I'll be surprised.
 
  • #432
  • #433
Brad Cooper would be laughing and pointing at this guy, his own *expert*. Looking down his nose at him.

Cooper is a voice/networking expert, and while he likely has extensive computer knowledge, this witness certainly holds the upper hand in computer analysis.
 
  • #434
Can he still be allowed to testify but not as an expert or will he be out as a witness if the judge disallows him being tendered as an expert witness?
 
  • #435
Kurtz is right. Chappell had looked at something like 5 computers forensically. His "expertise" was that he was MAC certified.

ETA--he may have had other certifications, I don't know--I don't want to misspeak on that. But his MAC certification is why he was brought in, IIRC, and he had examined very few computers before this testimony.
 
  • #436
  • #437
BZ is making some odd arguments, saying that he will not be able to question on the process, when he fought that Defense should not be privy to the process used by the FBI and that it didn't matter.
 
  • #438
Okay, apparent Det Chappel had no doctorate in computer engineering and had examined five computers. Kinda what I thought
 
  • #439
Judge will not allow him to be considered an expert, Kurtz will argue that he doesn't know how the FBI got their evidence.

you called it!

bbm
 
  • #440
Judge is in a tough spot on this. He knows the state's case rests with the computer info.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
125
Guests online
2,718
Total visitors
2,843

Forum statistics

Threads
632,883
Messages
18,633,060
Members
243,327
Latest member
janemot
Back
Top