Yea, because you know Brads constitutional rights have been violated....and stuff.I would imagine the first order of business from the defense will be a motion to dismiss.
Yea, because you know Brads constitutional rights have been violated....and stuff.I would imagine the first order of business from the defense will be a motion to dismiss.
Yea, because you know Brads constitutional rights have been violated....and stuff.
will the defense be ready to proceed? will they ask for more time blah blah blah
Goood morning. Did you get the memo it's your turn to bring donuts?
Yeah, and remember, everybody, I get the chocolate-iced with Bostom cream filling. yummmmmmmmmm. Or maybe two of 'em.
True that, but.... here's my money right now that Kurtz will get that constitution rights violation in there somewhere.The CLAIM will be that the prosecution did not prove their client was guilty and the judge will very quickly deny the motion. I think the defense side does that in every case no matter how much evidence has been presented.
I would imagine the first order of business from the defense will be a motion to dismiss.
Got my laundry done. You know a load a day keeps the suspicions away! :floorlaugh:
Let's get this defense case started!![]()
To anybody who has been in the actual court room--approximately how many rows are there, behind where the parents sit?