State v Bradley Cooper 04-20-2011

[ncsu95]

Even if I don't always agree with you all with the analytical thoughts who want the facts, the data and the proof of things, I am still all about fairness and justice.
I'm an old lady, probably old enough to be your mom. I'm judging by your NCSU95--graduated in 95? Both my father and my brother had NCSU engineering degrees. My oldest son is there now working on one. Mine are in criminal justice and psychology. I am the odd person out in the family.

Yes, electrical engineering in 95. I was on the 6 year plan though (graduated magna laude, but spent 2 years co-oping at a nuclear power plant). I'll be turning 40 in 4 months.

 

[ncsu95]

Okay folks..I am outa here until tomorrow morning 930AM..half day tomorrow as I understand it..and I have to ask..full day friday?....Hummm..I guess that depends on the defense CIC..and unless State has rebuttal witnesses we could very well be into Closings next week>>,,yaaa Hoooo..

Anyway goodnight or day all..its been a pleasure debating and commenting..you all have a great evening...maybe get together with your loved one....Hee Hee for those that are clued to this website...

Have a great evening...Salut from Canada!!!:canada::leaf2::wave:

tomorrow is a full day. No court on Friday. Next Thursday is a half day.

 

[NCEast]

Yes, electrical engineering in 95. I was on the 6 year plan though (graduated magna laude, but spent 2 years co-oping at a nuclear power plant). I'll be turning 40 in 4 months.

I am very, very proud of you. Not only are you intelligent but you are very well mannered. I'm sure your own mother is very proud.

 

[gritguy]

Yes, electrical engineering in 95. I was on the 6 year plan though (graduated magna laude, but spent 2 years co-oping at a nuclear power plant). I'll be turning 40 in 4 months.

I finished undergrad there in 91. Back when it was about $400 a semester. :-D

 

[DogWood]

This video explains what happened yesterday better than anything I read on WRAL.

http://triangle.news14.com/content/...ense-begins-calling-witnesses-in-cooper-trial

 

[yosande]

The way you say that is incorrect and misleading. The VPN Client, which I use daily, does create a secure tunnel to the Cisco Network, AND prevents local network traffic from reaching your computer. It takes over the network connection as part of securing the tunnel, and traffic destined for the network must transit the tunnel, it cannot go outside the tunnel.

The point being, let's say computer user x is on the VPN, but he is a loser and is on an insecure home network. His neighbor, the evil Dr. Y, wants to attack the company that user x is on, so it would be a simple matter of accessing the WiFi network at user x's house and using that access to attack the company at the other end of the VPN. It does not work that way, if you are secured on the VPN, local network access is restricted. If not, anyone getting a virus or worm on your local network would have a broad golden path into the corporate network. Not a good idea.

So, are you saying that the only ones who could access and alter BC's pc is a Cisco employee? tia

 

[gritguy]

This forum has some excellent minds on it, and some very impressive command of technology by several. It's interesting even if hard to follow!

 

[BrownRice]

I am very, very proud of you. Not only are you intelligent but you are very well mannered. I'm sure your own mother is very proud.

Ahhhhhhh!

 

[sunshine05]

I was just listening to some of yesterday's testimony with JW and now know that he did do at least some forensic work. I see no reason at all why he was barred from discussing anything that was in the FBI reports. I really think the judge made a huge mistake barring all of that.

 

[unc70]

They key word being "imagined." Will take a strong imagination to believe that hackers and corruption framed BC.

We are about to the "turtle on a fencepost" point. If you see such a turtle, you know he shouldn't be there and he did not get there on his own.

 

[Star12]

Yes, they are jurors but are you not interested in what their take on 7 weeks of testimony is? Does it not bother you that we have listened and watched all these weeks and come away with little to nothing with respect to evidence? How many of the prosecution's witness were we thinking may produce solid evidence and they didn't--not the ME, not the real bug guy, not the mica scientist,,,,not anybody. Until the blacked out testimony of the computer testimony. We have struggled on this forum to put it all together and I'm wondering how they will be able to put it together, especially since they have not had people like the ones on here to explain it all to them as the testimony has slowly dragged on and on. We daily post our thoughts and feelings about each person's testimony--not that we always agree--but we are able to hash through it. They have not and I am very worried that there have not been very many clear points on which they can base a verdict. That's my concern.

PS: For either side, the lack of evidence is alarming.

'Scuse me. I came to Websleuths 3 years ago because of the Cooper case. I first saW the poster about Nancy missing posted on the door at Whole Foods across the street from the Harris Teeter that first Weekend that she Went missing. I have taken the bus tWice to get doWntoWn to the trial, sat and listened to testimony. The judge asked that We not scrutinize the jury because it made them nervous. I respect that. They are all dressed in casual clothing and each of them Wears a red juror's tag. I did notice one of them taking notes, but I pretty much ignored them. They don't talk to each other - it is forbidden that they speak to each other about the case. Others in the courtroom are also enjoined from talking - unless it is to a laWyer or the judge. Oh, and you can't hardly see the jury box because it is mostly hidden from the gallery as it is totally hidden from the camera. I sit here day after day on my computer reading and posting just as you do, hoping for justice, and often at night and early in the morning. So don't jump doWn my throat that I don't care What the jury thinks. I certainly do. But they are doing the first half of their job right noW. When they get the case they Will do their second half. Then, maybe, We Will find out What they think, and for sure We Will get their collective take on the testimony.

 

[nctekguy]

First time poster here...the CSA log from today really peaked my tech interest. My apologies if this was discussed earlier in the thread. My new membership won't allow me to actually search through this or any thread.

Does anyone else wonder if BC isn't responsible for some of the things on this CSA log?????

Based on the limited testimony today, I am surprised by the apparent lack of attention to this log by the prosecution. As I heard it from today, the CSA log was only now introduced, and by the defense over prosecution objection. Based on its brief exposure today, I am curious about a few of the things highlighted in that log by the defense direct exam. It left me wanting to see more.

Based on some of the details of the case that I have seen/heard, it would not surprise me if these things were never properly investigated by the state.

I think BC is guilty, but the tech aspects of the investigation leave much to be desired. I sure would like to know more about that CSA log and some of the other network activities of the BC systems.

 

[NCEast]

'Scuse me. I came to Websleuths 3 years ago because of the Cooper case. I first saW the poster about Nancy missing posted on the door at Whole Foods across the street from the Harris Teeter that first Weekend that she Went missing. I have taken the bus tWice to get doWntoWn to the trial, sat and listened to testimony. The judge asked that We not scrutinize the jury because it made them nervous. I respect that. They are all dressed in casual clothing and each of them Wears a red juror's tag. I did notice one of them taking notes, but I pretty much ignored them. They don't talk to each other - it is forbidden that they speak to each other about the case. Others in the courtroom are also enjoined from talking - unless it is to a laWyer or the judge. Oh, and you can't hardly see the jury box because it is mostly hidden from the gallery as it is totally hidden from the camera. I sit here day after day on my computer reading and posting just as you do, hoping for justice, and often at night and early in the morning. So don't jump doWn my throat that I don't care What the jury thinks. I certainly do. But they are doing the first half of their job right noW. When they get the case they Will do their second half. Then, maybe, We Will find out What they think, and for sure We Will get their collective take on the testimony.

I didn't jump down your throat.
I expressed my concerns.

 

[jmflu]

Crazy thought... Maybe Kurtz realized the faith he eschewed early on in BC (to me, in person) was misplaced. Maybe BC used his arrogance in their dealings and Kurtz's conscience got the better of him. Perhaps he is throwing the case... And that's why he didn't have someone more professional up there on that stand. I mean, you'd think winning is everything. But sometimes... You meet people like the Rentzs and you compare them to the jackass you are defending and you know... you're on the wrong side. What you're doing will free a killer.

Just a thought.

 

[WolfpackWoman]

Crazy thought... Maybe Kurtz realized the faith he eschewed early on in BC (to me, in person) was misplaced. Maybe BC used his arrogance in their dealings and Kurtz's conscience got the better of him. Perhaps he is throwing the case... And that's why he didn't have someone more professional up there on that stand. I mean, you'd think winning is everything. But sometimes... You meet people like the Rentzs and you compare them to the jackass you are defending and you know... you're on the wrong side. What you're doing will free a killer.

Just a thought.

Where in the world does this opinion come from? The defense scored big points today.

 

[Lori59]

I think BC is guilty. But I also think this judge has ruled for the prosecution over the defense, as to the line of questioning, in a biased way. As for the witness this morning however, to me personally, he did not come across as an expert, in that he did not have enough experience. JMO

 

[SleuthinNC]

I wonder who else is yet to be called. I want to hear from SH and JP. I would like to know if either one of them were with NC on Thursday. I also want to hear from MM to find out why he gave two affidavits.

 

[sunshine05]

I wonder who else is yet to be called. I want to hear from SH and JP. I would like to know if either one of them were with NC on Thursday. I also want to hear from MM to find out why he gave two affidavits.

I think he's going to have another technical expert, can't remember his name but he is very well known. I'm sure he will have MH and some of the eyewitnesses who claimed to see NC. I'll bet he will have at least one of his parents.

 

[yosande]

Way to go Boz...way to open up for the witness to give that response on Pro-Bono.

Was the witness, JW, ever asked if he knew BC personally? tia

 

[NCEast]

Was the witness, JW, ever asked if he knew BC personally? tia

Yes, and he said he did not know him.