It's sad that I was gone for 30 mins on a conf. call and there hasn't been one update yet.
You may be right, but I'm not gonna bet on that one... But how would they do it? By just showing more of the same??? I dunno.
But you have a point -- In a way, he needs to get up there, but it's too big a risk. I still wonder, as some others do, if the defense will just say, "The defense rests," just to show their disdain and to show that it is not worth defending. Big risk, yes, as has already been offered.
OTOH, I can't see Kurtz missing out on another opportunity to strut, obfuscate, and proclaim for three more hours. :waitasec:
I had to appear for jury duty (as a new American citizen that was a bit daunting) for a civil case a few months ago. Mobile signals were fine in the court room I was in but bailiffs and judges alike will confiscate the phone if they see you using it. I never picked up a WiFi signal on my iPhone but there are free hotspots all around that one can pick up from the ground floor (The Oxford, etc.). Without some sort of tethering to a mobile device or other connection that relies on mobile service I wouldn't plan on doing anything from the courthouse itself and I certainly wouldn't plan on doing anything from the court room without risk of losing your phone.
I definitely saw on camera a shot of AS sitting in the courtroom playing with her Blackberry, so . . .
The defense said in opening statements that the 6:05 call was to find the phone.
FBI agent: Something was accessed on Brad Cooper's Cisco laptop at 1 a.m. on July 12 (day Nancy went missing). #coopertrial
BOOM
That's damaging.
Not really.
Well, I thought it was until I saw that follow up tweet. What I get for jumping to conclusions.
I don't understand why they don't tweet more frequently?