State v Bradley Cooper 4-26-11

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #141
so at one point this morning there were at least 3 people in the courtroom who had sexual relations with HM?
 
  • #142
Just sayin', what exactly about 'playing nekkid kissy face' is a mischaracterization?

The witness testified under oath that it was a 'sexual encounter'. I'll go with the characterization of it from a participant in the act testifying under oath. You can go with a soft-pedalled characterization, doesn't change what it actually was though...
 
  • #143
Certainly, people connected with this case have sky high emotions on both sides. It is only human. Regardless of where one stands, each has the right to their own opinions.
Testimony coming up is likely to stir the kettle.....with people on both sides calling the kettle black. Doesn't change a thing IMO. It is part of the arena.
 
  • #144
Depending on how drunk JP was that night, it might be that the spirit was willing but the flesh did not cooperate, if you catch my drift.

Possibly, but I doubt it. If the "flesh did not coorperate" I think they would have BOTH said to each other "no worries, we didn't actually 'do it'".
 
  • #145
I will go back sometime today and see if I can find the affidavit that contains this.

That's ok...I can look for it. I "assume" NC told this to one of her friends? Or, a person she thought was a friend? I'm beginning to think the word "friend" had a different meaning in that neighborhood than it does elsewhere....:crazy:
 
  • #146
so at one point this morning there were at least 3 people in the courtroom who had sexual relations with HM?

That we know of. Not sure the entire courtroom has been polled on that.
 
  • #147
I might be missing it, but does it matter what they actually did on the couch? Is it b/c of the timing of the act? Otherwise, I'll just assume they did what they were meaning to do.

Is this a big topic just b/c of the delay in moving forward while the tape is reviewed before being played to the jury?
 
  • #148
so at one point this morning there were at least 3 people in the courtroom who had sexual relations with HM?

LOL, nice qualification - "at least".
 
  • #149
I don't know how old you are, nor your situation, but remember back to a time when you were with a man who was too drunk to remember anything. Often times, when men are that drunk, *stuff* just doesn't work the way they'd like it too.......

'nuff said?

:floorlaugh:


So why does it matter what actually happened if the intent was there? How does that make it any different? If his "equipment" failed or not, the intent was the same. And if there are two people naked on a couch you don't have to make a big leap as to why they are there.
 
  • #150
so - back to SH...

In the oft-linked and referred to motion by the defense, wasn't he one of the folks that they wanted any and all information pertaining to him having a sexual relationship with NC? And also CD?

Were either of these witnesses asked anything regarding these allegations (or - more properly, defense assertions) during their testimony?

If these items in the oft-linked motion were in fact all REAL - would not the defense have questioned these witnessed while they were on the stand?

we see the JP testimony - and that appears to have been already "known" but so far nothing has been presented to confirm the other MANY assertions....

just sayin'
 
  • #151
a "sexual encounter" can be comprised of many things. It doesn't only mean intercourse and it may not necessarily include intercourse. The allegation that JP could have or might have been the youngest daughter's bio father relates to that detail. Of course she looks just like BC so that alone makes that rumor stupid.
 
  • #152
  • #153
That's ok...I can look for it. I "assume" NC told this to one of her friends? Or, a person she thought was a friend? I'm beginning to think the word "friend" had a different meaning in that neighborhood than it does elsewhere....:crazy:

I know that the defense crossed Diana D. about the incident.
 
  • #154
I might be missing it, but does it matter what they actually did on the couch? Is it b/c of the timing of the act? Otherwise, I'll just assume they did what they were meaning to do.

Is this a big topic just b/c of the delay in moving forward while the tape is reviewed before being played to the jury?

I think the timing matters based on the birth of NC's second child.
 
  • #155
I might be missing it, but does it matter what they actually did on the couch? Is it b/c of the timing of the act? Otherwise, I'll just assume they did what they were meaning to do.

Is this a big topic just b/c of the delay in moving forward while the tape is reviewed before being played to the jury?

jinx!
 
  • #156
FYI, don't know if this has been shared before, but here is a link that lists every wintess, theday they testified, and which parts of the video:

http://frictionpowered.wordpress.com/file-cabinet/nancy-cooper-murder-trial/


This is terrific -- when complete, assuming that it will be, the entire list (if it's allowed) along with a link should be put on a Sticky, IMO. It's a great resource.

Thanks!!
icon14.gif
 
  • #157
How ironic to call SH and JP back to back! Would have been even better if they had called Jezebel herself, HM, right in between the two!
 
  • #158
Could he 'remember' more than being naked in his second interview? I don't remember him ever actually remembering? Nor do I remember Nancy ever actually remembering either. And of course, she's not here to ask.......

Just sayin', what exactly about 'playing nekkid kissy face' is a mischaracterization?

I dunno but I'm kind of confused at the point of getting naked if they are just going to kiss.

Just saying.
 
  • #159
I don't know how old you are, nor your situation, but remember back to a time when you were with a man who was too drunk to remember anything. Often times, when men are that drunk, *stuff* just doesn't work the way they'd like it too.......

'nuff said?

:floorlaugh:

hate to break it to you, but it depends on who they're with :D
 
  • #160
so at one point this morning there were at least 3 people in the courtroom who had sexual relations with HM?

:silly:

Just 3??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
66
Guests online
1,733
Total visitors
1,799

Forum statistics

Threads
632,540
Messages
18,628,129
Members
243,190
Latest member
Lamoorh
Back
Top