- Joined
- Mar 11, 2011
- Messages
- 1,338
- Reaction score
- 2,383
OK Now we're cooking. Witness recognized BC's userid, went back through chat logs and noticed BC asking about encryption software. Let's hope prosecution doesn't muck this up.
We have 2 vehicles and both are in my husband's name only. So was our house. I am a SAHM and I do not make a dime. I hope this is not common. Ultimately, I think s/he who makes the money has the power.
really??? she slept like this yet when she could have simply not come home from vacation she chose to return. Where was this testified to? I don't like bashing the victim nor do I like making the victim look like an angle. I believe this was a crappy marriage due to both parties. Brad was a jerk (being kind) but Nancy seemed a little spoiled.
So calls in March had to be dry runs?
So calls in March had to be dry runs?
What's the date of this chat?
No. I believe marital property passes to the surviving spouse outside of probate (unless there is a will).
really??? she slept like this yet when she could have simply not come home from vacation she chose to return. Where was this testified to? I don't like bashing the victim nor do I like making the victim look like an angle. I believe this was a crappy marriage due to both parties. Brad was a jerk (being kind) but Nancy seemed a little spoiled.
What's the date of this chat?
What's the date of this chat?
Exactly. More about the money, more about the laundry, more about the cluttered garage, etc. The new testimony was about Nancy telling Dr. Hackling that Brad called her a "dumb F***." WHY did that not come from the real estate agent, who was supposed to have witnessed it?
April 2008
Good questions, my off the cuff answer would be it never happened and Nancy embelished.