State v. Bradley Cooper 4-6-2011

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #581
But to me, IF he just committed murder, he would have been so careful NOT to to do anything suspicious. He knows all the records are traceable. JMO

not all criminals are thinking about the big picture
 
  • #582
Going back to previous comments about Nancy sending a message at 4:42 a.m. and in the message saying she was going running, it didn't specify running outside. There has been testimony about her running at LTF and it is open 24/7.

How do we know she sent the e-mail? Perhaps BC did and agreed for her to the mediation?
 
  • #583
I thought, after he returned home, he was busy giving the baby her bottle, starting more laundry, appeasing nancy with more cleaning, & google searching?

He's just a Renaissance Man, can do it all! Not that he'd ever done it before, just was able to on the day that his wife disappeared.
 
  • #584
I'll take them odds. I'll go with 4 days, hung jury.

no hanging...I may change my time depending on when Jury gets the case, I stick with 1 and 45 if it is after lunch
 
  • #585
How do we know she sent the e-mail? Perhaps BC did and agreed for her to the mediation?

Did he have access to the actual email account or was he just fowarding the emails to his account?
 
  • #586
His cell and home VM PIN was 42424 (something like that)
His Ireland VM PIN was 12345

So when he was at home, he entered in the 12345 Ireland PIN instead of the 42424 PIN. Then he immediately corrected it by entering 42424.
 
  • #587
How do we know she sent the e-mail? Perhaps BC did and agreed for her to the mediation?

Good point. Just to clarify, I don't think the mediation they were talking about was anything more than trying to mediate the seperation agreement without going through the more expensive "battling it out in court".
 
  • #588
I thought, after he returned home, he was busy giving the baby her bottle, starting more laundry, appeasing nancy with more cleaning, & google searching?

As I've said many times, I manage a live voip system. I have had calls and emails today about certain things not working (calls to a conferencing system not working and calls with users having issues with voicemail not being sent via email). Do you know what I did? I immediately called into the conferencing system and called and left myself a vm to verify I get the email. Since he supports a live system (based on testimony), if he got a message saying something wasn't working with voicemail, it would make sense for him to call and leave himself a voicemail. Do you know what I say when I leave a test voicemail for myself? I say "test" or "this is a test" or "okay test".

Outside of that what other purpose would he have for doing these seemingly work related calls?
 
  • #589
I'll take them odds. I'll go with 4 days, hung jury.

Somebody needs to start letting the prosecution know right now, which may already be too late, that Zell is the ONLY one who can do their closing argument so that the jury will have a decent understanding of what the prosecution's case has been. By the time the defense puts on their case, who knows how lost the jury will be. Zell is the only ADA who appears to be spirited and on target with his questioning.
 
  • #590
I wish the camera would focus on Brad for a minute. I am thinking his head is hung very low!!
 
  • #591
I agree with the possibility of work related testing. If this witness through the prosecution or defense brings in other activity that involved contacting actual people and not just sending a test vm message to himself, I will agree with you.

He called into a conferencing system. That wasn't test vm related.
 
  • #592
  • #593
But he was so smart, he never thought they would trace anything back to him. All of these trails, records, and logs shouldn't have ever come to light. Don't forget his narcissism and elevated self-love.

I really do think he thought with his expert knowledge of all this stuff..and the amt of time he expended on his phone, internet etc..He thought he could erase much of this stuff..do some laundry..and didnt have to report Nancy missing until next day..he would be able to cover ALL tracks...But rut rho..Nancy's friends had already rumblings and asking about Nancy at 9AM...I think he somehow overlooked that VM this witness was able to retrieve test123..(Ireland Acct)...BUT bottomline for me is He had to get rid of that FDX item..thus his trip with the kids earlier that afternoon....There is just too many coinky Dinks for def. to defer likelihoods here..:twocents:
 
  • #594
His cell and home VM PIN was 42424 (something like that)
His Ireland VM PIN was 12345

So when he was at home, he entered in the 12345 Ireland PIN instead of the 42424 PIN. Then he immediately corrected it by entering 42424.

Thanks. That's why I asked about multiple accounts.
 
  • #595
BTW, in case some were still wondering what Zellinger was trying to get Dantoni to say this morning, this except from N & O might shed some light:

But D'Antoni backed away from previous statements he made in which he insinuated there might have been a romantic liaison between the two.

Thank you.....we knew it! He should have either stuck with his original testimony to LE or never been called to testify at all.
 
  • #596
As I've said many times, I manage a live voip system. I have had calls and emails today about certain things not working (calls to a conferencing system not working and calls with users having issues with voicemail not being sent via email). Do you know what I did? I immediately called into the conferencing system and called and left myself a vm to verify I get the email. Since he supports a live system (based on testimony), if he got a message saying something wasn't working with voicemail, it would make sense for him to call and leave himself a voicemail. Do you know what I say when I leave a test voicemail for myself? I say "test" or "this is a test" or "okay test".

Outside of that what other purpose would he have for doing these seemingly work related calls?

Wouldnt there be a record of a reported problem for these incidents? If it was work related it should be captured.

Sorry, but Brad has proven to be repeatedly deceitful - affairs, spying, etc - I dont buy he was working - he was covering his tracks to use work as an alibi (he had no friends to speak of).
 
  • #597
I wish the camera would focus on Brad for a minute. I am thinking his head is hung very low!!

Brad is coloring
 
  • #598
Ooooh, Zellinger brought his snark today, didn't he?
 
  • #599
I get the sense that the pros. is looking for anything and everything to find a way he could have spoofed that call. When the witness brought up a fax, he asked a bunch of questions on that. Now he's showing him the # from France. They have no clue, IMO.
 
  • #600
What defense needs to do is prove just who all those numbers belonged to..and they better all be WORK RELATED..otherwise all his calls utilizing these numbers would indicate NON-work related...

This witness does give credence to what Prosecution is asserting in their theory..also the fact that back in 2008 this type of ability was NOT available to the public..only Cisco Personale ..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
76
Guests online
4,108
Total visitors
4,184

Forum statistics

Threads
632,651
Messages
18,629,699
Members
243,235
Latest member
MerrillAsh
Back
Top