State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-14-12

[octobermoon]

I don't recall that bank statement ever being introduced as evidence before. I missed that part of the testimony -- did they say how much money was in the account?

Not that I heard. Just that is was unopened in the recycling bin in the garage.

 

[luckyme]

Not that I heard. Just that is was unopened in the recycling bin in the garage.

Wonder if thats how he wined and dined his women on the side at the cracker barrell without michelle knowing?

 

[athy]

Maybe we can tie it all back to the satanic cult in California that kidnapped Laci? Any vans spotted in the area? LOL!! :what:

don't forget that famous bushy hair guy

 

[otto]

One reason why parents and children have joint bank or stock accounts is because of inheritance as it avoids potential delays in processing estates. Another reason is if there was any joint property at one time or if one helped manage property. I didn't catch how much was in the account, but that may give clues as to the reason for the account.

How much was in the account?

 

[luckyme]

One reason why parents and children have joint bank or stock accounts is because of inheritance as it avoids potential delays in processing estates. Another reason is if there was any joint property at one time or if one helped manage property. I didn't catch how much was in the account, but that may give clues as to the reason for the account.

How much was in the account?

True, but doesnt he have other siblings? I never caught what was in the acct.

 

[happy2binNC]

One reason why parents and children have joint bank or stock accounts is because of inheritance as it avoids potential delays in processing estates. Another reason is if there was any joint property at one time or if one helped manage property. I didn't catch how much was in the account, but that may give clues as to the reason for the account.

How much was in the account?

I agree, and I have a joint account with my mother for that very reason. However, my mother is a widow. PY has a husband who could access their funds in the event of PY's death.

 

[fifteen89]

Imagine what a coincidence!

The very night JY allegedly fixes his hotel room door so he wouldn't need a key to reenter, thus no reenter evidence of his room when he was definitely seen after the first arrival entry to his hotel room,.............he allegedly used a twig to keep the exit door propped open, therefore it wasn't him who coincidentally propped the door open a while later with a rock, that was removed by a hotel employee when noticed in the early morning hours,

And that coincidentally someone unplugged the cameras in the hallway that coincidentally JY needed to reenter his hotel room. Then coincidentally someone AGAIN moved the camera's viewing by turning the camera, so AGAIN JY couldn't be seen leaving his hotel room in the morning.,..


And coincidentally MY was murdered on that SAME night.

And coincidentally, JY's clothes he wore in the hotel lobby, were NOT in his suitcase, his car, his anything, and JY had to coincidentally borrow a friends shoes, all, coincidentally on the night that an unknown assailant came to the Young home and brutally murdered MY and baby.

Then we are to believe that coincidentally the newspaper person who saw all the lights on at the Young home early the morning MY was murdered and that it was a coincidence a car matching JY's auto description was someone else,

And that the coincidence that the store clerk recognized JY as the person who cussed at her and threw $$ at her and left without getting his change, all within 45 minutes of the Young residence shortly after the time MY was to have been murdered, was wrong..........oh, and that coincidentally she's wrong also when she said the customer that fateful morning was driving a vehicle which coincidentally matched the defendants?

I guess I'm wrong then, when I come to the conclusion there's no way in heck could all of these COINCIDENCES just so happen on the very night MY is killed. I won't even take into consideration the computer searches of head trauma and strangulation, which was the two causes contributing to MY's COD.

Or the coincidence that JY was having a full blown affair with one of MY's alleged freinds...........

Or that coincidentally, out of three pregnancies MY had, the only surviving child, prior to birth, JY was insisting MY get an abortion....

So, although many LE say there's no coincidence when it comes to murder, yet in this case, the defense wants us to believe that there was how many coincidences in this particular case that come to a perfect storm and an innocent man is being accused of murder?

Hmmmmmmmmmmm, let me see now,
fran


PS......Could I ask a show of hands, who of us, IF we were completely INNOCENT, would NOT talk to LE until compelled to after all those many months, and only because without the testimony, you'd be in prison for the rest of your life on something you didn't do?

You refused to testify in a court suit, with the possibility you'd loose custody of your only child?

You would withhold filing for a $1M life insurance policy award, because if you did you'd most likely have to appear in court if the insurance provider objected, because you were a POI in your spouses murder?

I mean, if you were innocent, would you really NOT be willing to talk?

This is hypothetical, fwiw, IF you were innocent.

:clap::clap::clap:
I'd like to add one tiny tidbit to this great post. I personally find it more than coincidental that the unknown intruder didn't assault Michelle. If the unknown intruder didn't know Michelle, the unknown intruder probably didn't know she was pregnant.

 

[otto]

True, but doesnt he have other siblings? I never caught what was in the acct.

Even if he has other siblings, only one child needs a joint account with the parent for the purpose of processing the estate.

 

[otto]

I agree, and I have a joint account with my mother for that very reason. However, my mother is a widow. PY has a husband who could access their funds in the event of PY's death.

Different people sort out their finances in different ways. If Pat inherited something from her mom or from her first husband's estate that was meant to be passed along to her children, then she may put that money in a separate joint account with one of her children - perhaps her only son.

 

[fifteen89]

I don't think she will be called.

JMO

I'm wondering if she's on the list to intimidate/worry the other side.....that's why I'm curious which side listed her.

 

[otto]

I think it's odd that so much was made of the condoms in Jason's luggage ... we already know that he was having an affair. I also completely agree with n/t on this one ... conferences are usually a free for all and what happens at the conference stays at the conference.

 

[MyBelle]

Did the def. explain during the first trial why Jason had a bank acct with his mother? He was a grown man with a wife and child. TIA

Why would either side need to explain something that is totally unrelated to the murder? I think it's a fairly common practice of many elderly parents. Mine do it.

 

[Cammy]

I'm wondering if she's on the list to intimidate/worry the other side.....that's why I'm curious which side listed her.

I believe CY may have been on the last trial witness list too.

I don't know what she could testify to, as she seems to love her Dad very much from all the photos I have seen of them, and she can't be expected to remember anything from 5+years ago.

She looks just like her Daddy too.

JMO

 

[Lori59]

I think it's odd that so much was made of the condoms in Jason's luggage ... we already know that he was having an affair. I also completely agree with n/t on this one ... conferences are usually a free for all and what happens at the conference stays at the conference.

I think the significance is,,, that it is not what you would expect from a husband...concerned over ruining a surprise purse, yet planning on getting lucky?? I won't even address the moral aspect....just his state of mind is conflicted as to what he wants people to believe about his intentions.

 

[Cammy]

I think it's odd that so much was made of the condoms in Jason's luggage ... we already know that he was having an affair. I also completely agree with n/t on this one ... conferences are usually a free for all and what happens at the conference stays at the conference.

Me either, same with the clothes.

He may have had his luggage still packed from a former trip and just threw some stuff for this trip in there.

As for shorts, the day before it was 77 degrees in Raleigh.

And, we have learned he was not a planner, he waited until just before he left to print out directions to his meeting.

Sounds like he was goofing off that day, running late, cutting grass and was just not a organized person.

I had to go out during some testimony , so I have to catch up.
JMO

 

[fifteen89]

Also, I think alibi's are important to check out...but when an alibi consist of a hotel within a conceivable distance from the crime, where a camera has been moved to prevent seeing who leaves, the person of interest has went out a back door to "smoke", phone has been turned off during the critical times, and an eyewitness says he got gas...it just comes across as an forced alibi...contrived, set up, I can go on and on.....

Plus (imo at least) he started the alibi the night before when he detailed to Schaad how many hours he was going to drive that night and how many he'd be driving the next day to get to his meeting. Too bad for him the timeline still shows he can't be eliminated.

 

[otto]

I think the significance is,,, that it is not what you would expect from a husband...concerned over ruining a surprise purse, yet planning on getting lucky?? I won't even address the moral aspect....just his state of mind is conflicted as to what he wants people to believe about his intentions.

The moral implications are no different than the moral implications of spending time with his girlfriend during his anniversary. For all anyone knows, they were still in the suitcase from that out of town trip.

 

[Cammy]

I think the significance is,,, that it is not what you would expect from a husband...concerned over ruining a surprise purse, yet planning on getting lucky?? I won't even address the moral aspect....just his state of mind is conflicted as to what he wants people to believe about his intentions.

Hard to explain or defend his actions of cheating on Michelle, that's for sure.

I just hope she never knew...

 

[MyBelle]

One reason why parents and children have joint bank or stock accounts is because of inheritance as it avoids potential delays in processing estates. Another reason is if there was any joint property at one time or if one helped manage property. I didn't catch how much was in the account, but that may give clues as to the reason for the account.

How much was in the account?

Doesn't really matter how much money was in it. I think elderly parents routinely add a child to an account just to ensure bills are paid if something happens to either or both such as illness or accident.

JMO

 

[Cammy]

Bottle Cap

Today was mostly continued testimony of the collector of evidence from the crime scene. So most of it will most likely be talked about again by the expert witnesses who's job it is to analyze the forensic part, ie finger prints, etc.

Now they're with another collector of evidence,

About the only thing that made you catch your breath was when they read J's anniversary card to MY. He sent it from Florida, as he was there consummating his affair with Ms... Money. Hence, he missed their anniversary,

The card was all sappy, but when you find out the purpose of him being gone from his wife's side on his anniversary, well, it just looks more like a sinister move on the part of JY.

Anyway, that's my take on it, a Gotcha' from the pros.

Now the def is trying to bring out the shoes. You might want to look at the last 1/2 hour video of today. I believe they left us hanging.

JMHO
fran

Thanks, Fran, I am going to try to catch up later !

So, a good later day for the Pros?

Trials are like :rollercoaster: