State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-14-12

[Lori59]

The moral implications are no different than the moral implications of spending time with his girlfriend during his anniversary. For all anyone knows, they were still in the suitcase from that out of town trip.

So then we can agree, he was a cheating man, immoral, liar and didn't like his wife at the time of her brutal murder. Not only on his anniversary, but some could say he was a chronic selfish cheater. But, I didn't want to get moral on this....just sayin his alibi is based on his concern for his wife, calling his sister in law and all, yet he had condoms in his suitcase....those two behavior are contradictory.

 

[MyBelle]

I believe CY may have been on the last trial witness list too.

I don't know what she could testify to, as she seems to love her Dad very much from all the photos I have seen of them, and she can't be expected to remember anything from 5+years ago.

She looks just like her Daddy too.

JMO

She may have very vivid memories from 5 years ago. iirc, she at one point had a therapist because LE seized a report during one of their searches. If that is the case, her therapist may also be testifying.

JMO

 

[Cammy]

Did Becky Holt ask Jason about the missing dark shirt w/ stripe when she questioned him in the first trial? I can't remember...

Nope, she never asked.

I am not sure if she forgot or if it was:

"Never ask a question, you don't know the answer to "

Maybe if Jason had a answer, she didn't want the Jury to hear it, so she kind of just left it out there, that it was missing....

JMO

 

[octobermoon]

Why would either side need to explain something that is totally unrelated to the murder? I think it's a fairly common practice of many elderly parents. Mine do it.

I just found it odd that the statement was found unopened in the recycle bin in the garage. Did MY know about the account and did she know about the check for his pension when they didn't have heat in the house.

Seems to me JY kept a lot of secrets. Secrets can show motive for murder imo.

I didn't watch the first trial and know none of the background. I am learning more about their life together and apart with each new day of trial.

I share property with my mother because we are both widowed, but we have never shared a bank account. The bank account is covered in her POA/living will in case of death or severe impairment. As is mine.

I was just wondering. That's all.

 

[Cammy]

She may have very vivid memories from 5 years ago. iirc, she at one point had a therapist because LE seized a report during one of their searches. If that is the case, her therapist may also be testifying.

JMO

Possibly.....
I do remember that search with the papers being found, didn't sound like Jason or the Youngs were trying to keep CY from revealing whatever she might know.

JMO

 

[Cammy]

Um...I think there's somethin' up with that USA paper found in the car.

I'm gonna guess,.............it wasn't from the hotel, but a newsstand. Let's see if that's correct. lease:

I love mysteries, don't you!

:waiting:
fran

I think it was either the one he asked the desk clerk for, or the one delivered to his room.

 

[MyBelle]

So then we can agree, he was a cheating man, immoral, liar and didn't like his wife at the time of her brutal murder. Not only on his anniversary, but some could say he was a chronic selfish cheater. But, I didn't want to get moral on this....just sayin his alibi is based on his concern for his wife, calling his sister in law and all, yet he had condoms in his suitcase....those two behavior are contradictory.

Jason Young remained silent to LE and did not offer any alibi.

Condoms in a suitcase aren't evidence of guilt for homicide. We already know he was an adulterer. No surprise there. If the ADA starts harping about condoms and other women, she'll again lose more than half the jury as well as the Judge just as she did last go around.

JMO

 

[RaleighNC]

I think it's odd that so much was made of the condoms in Jason's luggage ... we already know that he was having an affair. I also completely agree with n/t on this one ... conferences are usually a free for all and what happens at the conference stays at the conference.

Not the conferences I attend, nor those that my peers attend.

However - the condoms are irrelevant- they just further cement the fact he was a louse.

Nothing new there and don't relate to a murder unless he stretched one over his whole body to deflect the blood splatter.

 

[Cammy]

If I were going to buy one, first I would naturally go to e-bay and print off an expired auction and leave that on the printer so I could come back to it days later when I've had time to reflect on it! If I thought you might see that print out from the expired auction, a possibility of course I would think of the next morning, I naturally would make frantic calls to your sister asking her to get the page off the printer. Same as anybody!

Jason was not actively bidding on any purses, he ws looking for examples to show MF,she told him not to buy one without checking with her first.

 

[gritguy]

Jason Young remained silent to LE and did not offer any alibi.

Condoms in a suitcase aren't evidence of guilt for homicide. We already know he was an adulterer. No surprise there. If the ADA starts harping about condoms and other women, she'll again lose more than half the jury as well as the Judge just as she did last go around.

JMO

He testified during his last trial offering his alibi.

 

[CBTampa]

I am sorry, but I did not follow the first trial. I am curious though, was there a meeting setup that he was supposed to be at the morning of the murder? At the end of today, it sounded like there wasn't.

 

[Lori59]

Jason Young remained silent to LE and did not offer any alibi.

Condoms in a suitcase aren't evidence of guilt for homicide. We already know he was an adulterer. No surprise there. If the ADA starts harping about condoms and other women, she'll again lose more than half the jury as well as the Judge just as she did last go around.

JMO

He did remain silent...hmm. His defense is he was at the Hampton Inn in Va....that is considered an alibi to me.
I agree if they harp on his cheating ways it can go too far and loose a jury...but to let the jury know what was in his luggage, including condoms...isn't harping to me.

 

[gritguy]

Not the conferences I attend, nor those that my peers attend.

However - the condoms are irrelevant- they just further cement the fact he was a louse.

Nothing new there and don't relate to a murder unless he stretched one over his whole body to deflect the blood splatter.

Well if one wishes he were innocent, it's nice to have something to think about other than the three intentionally defeated security devices that obscured his return to the hotel. Because that is certainly relevant evidence.

 

[gritguy]

I am sorry, but I did not follow the first trial. I am curious though, was there a meeting setup that he was supposed to be at the morning of the murder? At the end of today, it sounded like there wasn't.

Business meeting? There was and he attended though he showed up late.

 

[Cammy]

What is the significance of the water bottle? (They sure do jump around a lot. Both sides)

Jason testifed that when he went out to smoke a cigar, he took the water bottle(s) given to him when he checked in.

Being a Hilton Honors Member, he got some extra stuff like that, and a newspaper they delivered to his room in the middle of the nite, and hung on his doorknob.....
:wink:
I won't ruin this part for anyone who has not seen it.

 

[Cammy]

I am sorry, but I did not follow the first trial. I am curious though, was there a meeting setup that he was supposed to be at the morning of the murder? At the end of today, it sounded like there wasn't.

Yes, his meeting was set up 2-3 weeks in advance by his company.
We will hear from the medical director stating this.

Jason himself did not set up the meeting.

 

[octobermoon]

Yes, his meeting was set up 2-3 weeks in advance by his company.
We will hear from the medical director stating this.

Jason himself did not set up the meeting.

Near the end today the Judge sent the jury out to decide a def. objection to the last witness. It was kind of confusing but the gist was that emails were found from someone he said he met with (I think JY gave that impression in the email), but the person he said he met had never met him. Confused yet?

Anyhoo the judge said that it was heresy for now, but the lady could testify about it herself. I think. The judge is a "low talker"

I hope someone else can explain this better.

 

[Just the Fax]

I am sorry, but I did not follow the first trial. I am curious though, was there a meeting setup that he was supposed to be at the morning of the murder? At the end of today, it sounded like there wasn't.

You are absolutely right.

He supposedly 'dropped in' unannounced at TC hospital.
We'll see if that is true...the PT has something they want in and the defense objected.

 

[Just the Fax]

Here is what he said in the first trial.
Apparently there is something fishy,,,,we'll see
----------------------------------------------


Someone from chartOne gave him a lead the TC hospital was close to making a decision on records system.
He had e-mailed director before, may have even called her before...left VM before.

So he 'drops in" (salesmen need to be persistent he says)
The director was in a meeting, so he left his card with receptionist and left.

Charged ChartOne $94.40 for mileage (295 miles)

 

[otto]

I am sorry, but I did not follow the first trial. I am curious though, was there a meeting setup that he was supposed to be at the morning of the murder? At the end of today, it sounded like there wasn't.

My impression was that the prosecution proved that Jason billed his company for the trip to Brevard by claiming that he had a meeting at the hospital, but the officer testifying said that he spoke to the woman Jason claimed he met with and she didn't meet with him. Someone else met with him instead. The defense objected that it was hearsay and the line of questiong stopped.