sure fits in line with that strange car accident with the strange leave-the-daughter-to-get-coffee-quick-before-we-actually-leave trip as well.
he tried for the 4mil (ala accident), failed, so tried for the 2mil.... and I seriously bet those computer searches were looking up ways to still go for the 4mil....
moo
From what I understand, when they had the car accident, her policy was $1M with double indemnity, at the time of the car accident.
But then in September, just before she was murdered, JY signed and requested to increase her policy to $2M with double indemnity. MY's friend has already testified that MY thought the $1M was too high. Do you really think MY knew JY had doubled her policy?
He waited until July after MY was murdered to stop the monthly deductions for MY's policy. At that time he was requested to put it in writing. Normally they include a claim form, since the subject is deceased. However, because the case was under investigation, they didn't include the claim form.
IIRCC, JY said during the course of the investigation, he wasn't going to file a claim on the policy because he knew it would look like he murdered his wife for the money.
Now I ask anyone here, he CLAIMED he didn't go for custody of his daughter because of the $$$ involved, he was broke. The pros has already proved he had $60K in the bank, or at the least, just over $20K. As MY had a total of $4M life insurance that was going to eventually be paid out:
Do you still buy him not fighting to keep custody of his daughter because of the money?
This isn't rocket science. I think we can all see what the deal is here. I pray the jury sees it too.
Just wonderin'
fran