State vs. Jason Lynn Young 2-23-2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #381
Sorry, I guess I wasn't clear in my question. That is what I want to know. What is that trail and where did it start? Was it because he was having multiple affairs, or that he didn't want his second child, or insurance money. I really don't know as I was not following this case in the beginning. And so far I haven't seen anything that would make me convict him except I think he did do it. I just want the jury to have everything and I am not so sure they do. jmo


It was testified to this morning that Michelle thought the $1M life insurance was excessive, but she got it anyway, because Jason wanted it.

OTOH, in September '06, just PRIOR to Michelle's murder, JASON signed a document increasing Michelle's life insurance to $2M.

That's all the motive he needed. The other, infidelity, childish behavior, controlling personality, and everything else is just added to that. But, IMHO, $$$$$$$$$$$ was the motive, because then it would afford him the freedom of doing his other stuff, like endless women.

JMHO
fran
 
  • #382
Why would ANYONE murder someone, period? We, as normal, sane, non-murderous people cannot begin to guess because we are normal, sane, non-murderous people. We can't understand making the decision that the best route is to murder someone but murderers do.
 
  • #383
back on
 
  • #384
TH's are paid to talk, give opinion, and sometimes say something that will draw in viewers. Just because they are on tv, perhaps have a background in law doesn't give them any more of a crystal ball into what will happen than anyone here.

You know the great thing about predictions...everyone is right until the result happens.
 
  • #385
PT trying to bring in wrongful death action.
 
  • #386
Speak up Judge, JMO he is a low talker.
 
  • #387
  • #388
Wow looks like judge is letting wrongful death in
 
  • #389
Sounds like he is going to let it in.
 
  • #390
This is HUGE for the PT, IMO.

YES!
 
  • #391
So I can't understand what the judge is saying so I refresh WS to see what ya'll are saying he is saying and I refresh the video feed instead. D'OH! Thanks for the updates ^^
 
  • #392
I agree, I'm surprised he's letting it in.

Perhaps a legal type can answer this, but with this type of decision, I'm surprised there isn't some sort of conflict of interest considered he was also the judge in that proceeding.
 
  • #393
I am shocked. I was certain this would not come in, and gritguy posted in the legal questions thread that he felt the same way.

Even the attorneys in the Cooper trial didn't mention the outcome of the custody case.
 
  • #394
here's a guy who would prefer, by his own testimony, to surrender physical custody of his daughter rather than fund a custody fight. Dollars, then, were more important than his daughter. That's his excuse; I think it also was because he didn't want to subject himself to having to tell his lies.

Very willing, obviously, to put a price on those in his life. He set it up to to save the money of divorce and potentially gain big once his alibi was accepted. In excess of 2,000,000. Maybe 4,000,000. He saw MY as worthless, a burden in life that he did not deserve to be saddled with. Every move she made, everything she did, just increased his irritation and impressed upon him the burden she was. Get rid of that, gain a lot of money, live life large and free. Just takes one night.

In his craigslist ad, he sent the girl pictures that showed different vacation destinations more than it showed him (he was in a snowsuit in one, c'mon) and told in his e-mail of other trips. He liked that, liked the travel, like to impress women.

He deserved the life he wanted. Money, women, freedom. MY kept if from him. And her being gone, forever, was the key to obtaining it. His logic, so far as it went, is understandable, and evil.
 
  • #395
I had trouble hearing him too but did he say something to the effect that they would make it clear that JY was not found guilty in the civil action?
 
  • #396
Judge is going to instruct jury before the topic is testified to, but IANAL and didn't catch it all. Hope someone else did.

I am very interested in this. Please post updates.
 
  • #397
It's not the VERDICT reached in the civil case under the 'slayer law,' it's WHAT he said, why he didn't fight the civil suit which resulted in him loosing custody of his daughter. You put in he SHOULD have been eligible to collect $4M in life insurance, eventually, it pretty well makes his EXCUSE for not fighting custody of his daughter falls pretty flat, IMHO.

JMHO
fran
 
  • #398
Glad he's letting it in, but concerned about appellate issues.
 
  • #399
Glad he's letting it in, but concerned about appellate issues.

This is my thought too. I don't know what his limiting instruction is, but this is the first thing I've thought came close to reversible error in this case.
 
  • #400
This entire testimony will be irrelevant, IMO. He clearly didn't want to have to testify to protect himself for future criminal trial.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
92
Guests online
1,550
Total visitors
1,642

Forum statistics

Threads
632,543
Messages
18,628,172
Members
243,191
Latest member
MrsFancyGoar
Back
Top