Stephen Hawking says afterlife is a fairy story

  • #81
http://www.reuters.com/article/2008...6E220081031?feedType=RSS&feedName=scienceNews

"There is no opposition between faith's understanding of creation and the evidence of the empirical sciences," the pontiff said.

"Galileo saw nature as a book whose author is God."

The Catholic Church found the 17th-century astronomer Galileo guilty of heresy for insisting the earth revolved around the sun. It did not rehabilitate him until 1992.

Hawking is a guest at the week-long event, which will explore the theme: "Scientific Insights into the Evolution of the Universe and of Life."

In an interview with Reuters last year, Hawking said he was "not religious in the normal sense."

"I believe the universe is governed by the laws of science," he said. "The laws may have been decreed by God, but God does not intervene to break the laws."

The Catholic Church teaches "theistic evolution," which accepts evolution as scientific theory. Proponents see no reason why God could not have used an evolutionary process in forming the human species.

It's interesting to me that even the Pope thinks Hawking and his colleagues are alright sorts.

Perhaps reading Hawking's books - before condemning the man - might be the appropriate thing to do. Hawking and his severe disabilities are actually a gift to man's study of the more abstract sciences. No one experiences the world quite as he does - which gives him unique insight. I am glad to have lived during his time. Hawking is a seeker of truth. How evil can that be?

Do not mistake scientific endeavor and discipline for lack of humanity and human spirit. I challenge anyone to live in his body, accomplish what he's accomplished, and then daresay that there is no humanity or human spirit involved in such a curious, vibrant and brilliant mind and life.

IMO, my generation has been enriched by having had Hawking as an icon of philosophical and scientific thought, and an example of how tenacious spirit and perseverance and devotion to a life's work can overcome impossible physical odds to the point where a man with no voice, no useful body, but only a brain can still make significant contributions to the world.

:cow:
 
  • #82
Emma, I too don't quite get the hostility toward Hawking. As quoted in your link, he simply says what most scientists say: the universe functions according to certain fundamental principles and science has no way to tell us who or what set those principles in motion in the first place.

Where Hawking would probably disagree with some here is that he doesn't believe God intervenes and upends His own laws because we ask Him to do so. A lot of scientists have problems with that idea because it seems negated by the very concept of scientific laws.
 
  • #83
I'm a non-believer and am extremely thankful that I can live in a country where one can believe/not believe how one wishes to believe/not believe. I won't argue the point if heaven is real or not, because for every aspect a non-believer like me puts out there to say it doesn't, a believer can counter it. It just turns into a vicious loop and leads to animosity amongst us. All that I can do is respect other people's "belief" views and just smile when they go all "Travel Agent of the Lord" on me and advise me that I am going to "hell". I smile because our constitution gives them that right, under the aspect of free speech... who am I to down someone for exercising their right of free speech when telling me that I am going to hell.

Hawking is not a bad person for his views... the only gripe I have is that he wasted time to say what he said. But, then again, he exercised his right to free speech (as we see it in the U.S. ... he's English, and yes they have a form of free speech, as well) and said it... so be it.
 
  • #84
You didn't necessarily post too often, I just couldn't keep up, is all, lol. Never said I was the fastest guy in the world, hehe.

The longevity portion was only a small part of my explanation, but I think it stands to reason that if someone suddenly comes out and says God told them that murder was acceptable, it is safe to say that it did not come from God, as it contradicts God's teaching for the better part of 5,000 years. God said, "I, the Lord, do not change." So it is not believable that He suddenly changed His mind. He never changes because His Will was perfect from the beginning. :)
BBM Then what is the point of prayer?
 
  • #85
BBM Then what is the point of prayer?

His will for the laws that we are to follow are perfect and do not change. We cannot pray to make murder, adultery, lying, etc OK and have Him change His mind on those matters. That's what that means. We pray for our own needs and concerns, as Jesus taught us to do, but we also pray that God's Will be done, along with asking for wisdom and understanding, because He knows what is best for us better than we do. So sometimes He says "no" for our own good. :)
 
  • #86
I believe that our soul is the energy that "animates" our bodies, without the soul the body decays and dies.....ashes to ashes, dust to dust. I believe our bodies are the temple mentioned in the Bible which houses our soul, our soul is what does the work, not our bodies. Bodies are just a big bag of chemicals, doing what they are told by our brains and the brain dies when the soul, the electrical "spark" that makes us us leaves. Since the law of conservation of energy says that energy cannot be created or destroyed, I do not see how the soul can cease to be.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
The law of conservation of energy is a law of physics. It states that the total amount of energy in an system remains constant over time (is said to be conserved over time). A consequence of this law is that energy can neither be created nor destroyed: it can only be transformed from one state to another. The only thing that can happen to energy in a system is that it can change form: for instance chemical energy can become kinetic energy.

The body dies but the soul lives on as the energy it is. It depends upon the individual's actions in life and outlook as to where the soul goes after the death of the physical body. If you study reincarnation, individuals come back looking very similar to the way they looked in previous lives.

http://www.davidson.edu/academic/classics/neumann/CLA350/ErMyth.html
Plato's Republic
Book X, end: The Myth of Er
Socrates

Well, I said, I will tell you a tale; not one of the tales which Odysseus tells to the hero Alcinous, yet this too is a tale of a hero, Er the son of Armenius, a Pamphylian by birth. He was slain in battle, and ten days afterwards, when the bodies of the dead were taken up already in a state of corruption, his body was found unaffected by decay, and carried away home to be buried. And on the twelfth day, as he was lying on the funeral pile, he returned to life and told them what he had seen in the other world. He said that when his soul left the body he went on a journey with a great company, and that they came to a mysterious place at which there were two openings in the earth; they were near together, and over against them were two other openings in the heaven above. In the intermediate space there were judges seated, who commanded the just, after they had given judgment on them and had bound their sentences in front of them, to ascend by the heavenly way on the right hand; and in like manner the unjust were bidden by them to descend by the lower way on the left hand; these also bore the symbols of their deeds, but fastened on their backs. He drew near, and they told him that he was to be the messenger who would carry the report of the other world to men, and they bade him hear and see all that was to be heard and seen in that place. Then he beheld and saw on one side the souls departing at either opening of heaven and earth when sentence had been given on them; and at the two other openings other souls, some ascending out of the earth dusty and worn with travel, some descending out of heaven clean and bright. And arriving ever and anon they seemed to have come from a long journey, and they went forth with gladness into the meadow, where they encamped as at a festival; and those who knew one another embraced and conversed, the souls which came from earth curiously enquiring about the things above, and the souls which came from heaven about the things beneath. And they told one another of what had happened by the way, those from below weeping and sorrowing at the remembrance of the things which they had endured and seen in their journey beneath the earth (now the journey lasted a thousand years), while those from above were describing heavenly delights and visions of inconceivable beauty. The Story, Glaucon, would take too long to tell; but the sum was this: --He said that for every wrong which they had done to any one they suffered tenfold; or once in a hundred years --such being reckoned to be the length of man's life, and the penalty being thus paid ten times in a thousand years. If, for example, there were any who had been the cause of many deaths, or had betrayed or enslaved cities or armies, or been guilty of any other evil behaviour, for each and all of their offences they received punishment ten times over, and the rewards of beneficence and justice and holiness were in the same proportion. I need hardly repeat what he said concerning young children dying almost as soon as they were born. Of piety and impiety to gods and parents, and of murderers, there were retributions other and greater far which he described. He mentioned that he was present when one of the spirits asked another, 'Where is Ardiaeus the Great?' (Now this Ardiaeus lived a thousand years before the time of Er: he had been the tyrant of some city of Pamphylia, and had murdered his aged father and his elder brother, and was said to have committed many other abominable crimes.) The answer of the other spirit was: 'He comes not hither and will never come. And this,' said he, 'was one of the dreadful sights which we ourselves witnessed. We were at the mouth of the cavern, and, having completed all our experiences, were about to reascend, when of a sudden Ardiaeus appeared and several others, most of whom were tyrants; and there were also besides the tyrants private individuals who had been great criminals: they were just, as they fancied, about to return into the upper world, but the mouth, instead of admitting them, gave a roar, whenever any of these incurable sinners or some one who had not been sufficiently punished tried to ascend; and then wild men of fiery aspect, who were standing by and heard the sound, seized and carried them off; and Ardiaeus and others they bound head and foot and hand, and threw them down and flayed them with scourges, and dragged them along the road at the side, carding them on thorns like wool, and declaring to the passers-by what were their crimes, and that they were being taken away to be cast into hell.' And of all the many terrors which they had endured, he said that there was none like the terror which each of them felt at that moment, lest they should hear the voice; and when there was silence, one by one they ascended with exceeding joy. These, said Er, were the penalties and retributions, and there were blessings as great.

Now when the spirits which were in the meadow had tarried seven days, on the eighth they were obliged to proceed on their journey, and, on the fourth day after, he said that they came to a place where they could see from above a line of light, straight as a column, extending right through the whole heaven and through the earth, in colour resembling the rainbow, only brighter and purer; another day's journey brought them to the place, and there, in the midst of the light, they saw the ends of the chains of heaven let down from above: for this light is the belt of heaven, and holds together the circle of the universe, like the under-girders of a trireme. From these ends is extended the spindle of Necessity, on which all the revolutions turn. The shaft and hook of this spindle are made of steel, and the whorl is made partly of steel and also partly of other materials. Now the whorl is in form like the whorl used on earth; and the description of it implied that there is one large hollow whorl which is quite scooped out, and into this is fitted another lesser one, and another, and another, and four others, making eight in all, like vessels which fit into one another; the whorls show their edges on the upper side, and on their lower side all together form one continuous whorl. This is pierced by the spindle, which is driven home through the centre of the eighth. The first and outermost whorl has the rim broadest, and the seven inner whorls are narrower, in the following proportions --the sixth is next to the first in size, the fourth next to the sixth; then comes the eighth; the seventh is fifth, the fifth is sixth, the third is seventh, last and eighth comes the second. The largest (of fixed stars) is spangled, and the seventh (or sun) is brightest; the eighth (or moon) coloured by the reflected light of the seventh; the second and fifth (Saturn and Mercury) are in colour like one another, and yellower than the preceding; the third (Venus) has the whitest light; the fourth (Mars) is reddish; the sixth (Jupiter) is in whiteness second. Now the whole spindle has the same motion; but, as the whole revolves in one direction, the seven inner circles move slowly in the other, and of these the swiftest is the eighth; next in swiftness are the seventh, sixth, and fifth, which move together; third in swiftness appeared to move according to the law of this reversed motion the fourth; the third appeared fourth and the second fifth. The spindle turns on the knees of Necessity; and on the upper surface of each circle is a siren, who goes round with them, hymning a single tone or note. The eight together form one harmony; and round about, at equal intervals, there is another band, three in number, each sitting upon her throne: these are the Fates, daughters of Necessity, who are clothed in white robes and have chaplets upon their heads, Lachesis and Clotho and Atropos, who accompany with their voices the harmony of the sirens --Lachesis singing of the past, Clotho of the present, Atropos of the future; Clotho from time to time assisting with a touch of her right hand the revolution of the outer circle of the whorl or spindle, and Atropos with her left hand touching and guiding the inner ones, and Lachesis laying hold of either in turn, first with one hand and then with the other.

When Er and the spirits arrived, their duty was to go at once to Lachesis; but first of all there came a prophet who arranged them in order; then he took from the knees of Lachesis lots and samples of lives, and having mounted a high pulpit, spoke as follows: 'Hear the word of Lachesis, the daughter of Necessity. Mortal souls, behold a new cycle of life and mortality. Your genius will not be allotted to you, but you choose your genius; and let him who draws the first lot have the first choice, and the life which he chooses shall be his destiny. Virtue is free, and as a man honours or dishonours her he will have more or less of her; the responsibility is with the chooser --God is justified.' When the Interpreter had thus spoken he scattered lots indifferently among them all, and each of them took up the lot which fell near him, all but Er himself (he was not allowed), and each as he took his lot perceived the number which he had obtained. Then the Interpreter placed on the ground before them the samples of lives; and there were many more lives than the souls present, and they were of all sorts. There were lives of every animal and of man in every condition. And there were tyrannies among them, some lasting out the tyrant's life, others which broke off in the middle and came to an end in poverty and exile and beggary; and there were lives of famous men, some who were famous for their form and beauty as well as for their strength and success in games, or, again, for their birth and the qualities of their ancestors; and some who were the reverse of famous for the opposite qualities. And of women likewise; there was not, however, any definite character them, because the soul, when choosing a new life, must of necessity become different. But there was every other quality, and the all mingled with one another, and also with elements of wealth and poverty, and disease and health; and there were mean states also. And here, my dear Glaucon, is the supreme peril of our human state; and therefore the utmost care should be taken. Let each one of us leave every other kind of knowledge and seek and follow one thing only, if peradventure he may be able to learn and may find some one who will make him able to learn and discern between good and evil, and so to choose always and everywhere the better life as he has opportunity. He should consider the bearing of all these things which have been mentioned severally and collectively upon virtue; he should know what the effect of beauty is when combined with poverty or wealth in a particular soul, and what are the good and evil consequences of noble and humble birth, of private and public station, of strength and weakness, of cleverness and dullness, and of all the soul, and the operation of them when conjoined; he will then look at the nature of the soul, and from the consideration of all these qualities he will be able to determine which is the better and which is the worse; and so he will choose, giving the name of evil to the life which will make his soul more unjust, and good to the life which will make his soul more just; all else he will disregard. For we have seen and know that this is the best choice both in life and after death. A man must take with him into the world below an adamantine faith in truth and right, that there too he may be undazzled by the desire of wealth or the other allurements of evil, lest, coming upon tyrannies and similar villainies, he do irremediable wrongs to others and suffer yet worse himself; but let him know how to choose the mean and avoid the extremes on either side, as far as possible, not only in this life but in all that which is to come. For this is the way of happiness.

And according to the report of the messenger from the other world this was what the prophet said at the time: 'Even for the last comer, if he chooses wisely and will live diligently, there is appointed a happy and not undesirable existence. Let not him who chooses first be careless, and let not the last despair.' And when he had spoken, he who had the first choice came forward and in a moment chose the greatest tyranny; his mind having been darkened by folly and sensuality, he had not thought out the whole matter before he chose, and did not at first sight perceive that he was fated, among other evils, to devour his own children. But when he had time to reflect, and saw what was in the lot, he began to beat his breast and lament over his choice, forgetting the proclamation of the prophet; for, instead of throwing the blame of his misfortune on himself, he accused chance and the gods, and everything rather than himself. Now he was one of those who came from heaven, and in a former life had dwelt in a well-ordered State, but his virtue was a matter of habit only, and he had no philosophy. And it was true of others who were similarly overtaken, that the greater number of them came from heaven and therefore they had never been schooled by trial, whereas the pilgrims who came from earth, having themselves suffered and seen others suffer, were not in a hurry to choose. And owing to this inexperience of theirs, and also because the lot was a chance, many of the souls exchanged a good destiny for an evil or an evil for a good. For if a man had always on his arrival in this world dedicated himself from the first to sound philosophy, and had been moderately fortunate in the number of the lot, he might, as the messenger reported, be happy here, and also his journey to another life and return to this, instead of being rough and underground, would be smooth and heavenly. Most curious, he said, was the spectacle --sad and laughable and strange; for the choice of the souls was in most cases based on their experience of a previous life. There he saw the soul which had once been Orpheus choosing the life of a swan out of enmity to the race of women, hating to be born of a woman because they had been his murderers; he beheld also the soul of Thamyras choosing the life of a nightingale; birds, on the other hand, like the swan and other musicians, wanting to be men. The soul which obtained the twentieth lot chose the life of a lion, and this was the soul of Ajax the son of Telamon, who would not be a man, remembering the injustice which was done him the judgment about the arms. The next was Agamemnon, who took the life of an eagle, because, like Ajax, he hated human nature by reason of his sufferings. About the middle came the lot of Atalanta; she, seeing the great fame of an athlete, was unable to resist the temptation: and after her there followed the soul of Epeus the son of Panopeus passing into the nature of a woman cunning in the arts; and far away among the last who chose, the soul of the jester Thersites was putting on the form of a monkey. There came also the soul of Odysseus having yet to make a choice, and his lot happened to be the last of them all. Now the recollection of former tolls had disenchanted him of ambition, and he went about for a considerable time in search of the life of a private man who had no cares; he had some difficulty in finding this, which was lying about and had been neglected by everybody else; and when he saw it, he said that he would have done the had his lot been first instead of last, and that he was delighted to have it. And not only did men pass into animals, but I must also mention that there were animals tame and wild who changed into one another and into corresponding human natures --the good into the gentle and the evil into the savage, in all sorts of combinations.
All the souls had now chosen their lives, and they went in the order of their choice to Lachesis, who sent with them the genius whom they had severally chosen, to be the guardian of their lives and the fulfiller of the choice:

More at link`~
 
  • #87
If folks are a bit riled, it's because of Hawking's statement quoted in the OP:

I have lived with the prospect of an early death for the last 49 years. I'm not afraid of death, but I'm in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first. I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark.
bolded by me

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelo...ephen-hawking-says-afterlife-is-a-fairy-story

I don't know Hawking personally, so I don't know if it was his intent to offend, but it comes as no surprise that his words are construed by some as arrogant and an insult to believers. The blogger included the statement in her article precisely because she knew it would stir controversy, and we see by the response here and the 27,000+ comments on Yahoo that she was correct. Pretty smart cookie, that writer.

Personally, I have the utmost respect for Hawking, and can recall moments poring over his books in sheer frustration because my peabrain could not comprehend the mathematical concepts he envisioned so clearly. His work with gravity and his advances toward defining a unifed theory will surely change the way humans regard the physical world. I laud him for his efforts to bring cosmology to the masses with books like A Brief History of Time and The Universe in a Nutshell. I haven't read The Grand Design yet, but I'm sure I'll be fascinated when I do, though it's received mediocre reviews from science editors, so maybe not. Yet, Hawking is not my go-to man for matters divine, no more than Einstein for whom I have an even greater admiration. (I wouldn't ask my parish priest to explain the behavior of a quark, and likewise, I don't look to the scientists to enrich my understanding of the human soul.)

As for the Catholic Church, she gives a lot of leeway to the study of the physical sciences and evolution, up to the point that it denies God as the source and creator.

Concerning biological evolution, the Church does not have an official position on whether various life forms developed over the course of time. However, it says that, if they did develop, then they did so under the impetus and guidance of God, and their ultimate creation must be ascribed to him.
http://www.catholic.com/library/Adam_Eve_and_Evolution.asp

Where Hawking might've stood in favor with the Church previously, I doubt he'll be viewed by future pontiffs as an "all right sort" after his latest declaration in The Grand Design that undermines the role of the Creator.

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing," the excerpt says. "Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to ... set the Universe going."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2010-09-03-hawking02_ST_N.htm

Hawking's personal belief that the afterlife is a fairy story doesn't bother me. (And I'm certainly no "Travel Agent of the Lord" :floorlaugh: ) Each individual's faith is borne of his own unique experience. While my beliefs might differ, I can only greet his with respect because I haven't travelled his journey.

I am critical of the quote from his book where he states spontaneous creation as a scientific conclusion that renders God a non-essential player. Just as the Catholic Church gives wide berth to the study of evolution while maintaining its concern with the supernatural, so the scientists should confine their work within the bounds of the natural universe. It always annoys me when they do not. And while I'm well aware that as humans we face an innate struggle to reconcile the two realms -- and a fixation with one will elevate it to a position of dominance, leaving an unbalanced view of the whole -- a responsible scholar will resist the urge to do so through the exclusion of the other. In my humble opinion.

At any rate, to those who find Hawking's remarks disparaging, remember that beyond his superior intellect, he is simply a man, and the only singularity that really counts is within our transcendent human souls which are equal in their infinite potential. So take a huge grain of salt and go crank up some music! :)
 
  • #88
If folks are a bit riled, it's because of Hawking's statement quoted in the OP:
<snipped respectfully> AND BBM

Yet, Hawking is not my go-to man for matters divine, no more than Einstein for whom I have an even greater admiration. (I wouldn't ask my parish priest to explain the behavior of a quark, and likewise, I don't look to the scientists to enrich my understanding of the human soul.)

As for the Catholic Church, she gives a lot of leeway to the study of the physical sciences and evolution, up to the point that it denies God as the source and creator.

http://www.catholic.com/library/Adam_Eve_and_Evolution.asp

Where Hawking might've stood in favor with the Church previously, I doubt he'll be viewed by future pontiffs as an "all right sort" after his latest declaration in The Grand Design that undermines the role of the Creator.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2010-09-03-hawking02_ST_N.htm

Hawking's personal belief that the afterlife is a fairy story doesn't bother me. (And I'm certainly no "Travel Agent of the Lord" :floorlaugh: ) Each individual's faith is borne of his own unique experience. While my beliefs might differ, I can only greet his with respect because I haven't travelled his journey.

I am critical of the quote from his book where he states spontaneous creation as a scientific conclusion that renders God a non-essential player. Just as the Catholic Church gives wide berth to the study of evolution while maintaining its concern with the supernatural, so the scientists should confine their work within the bounds of the natural universe. It always annoys me when they do not. And while I'm well aware that as humans we face an innate struggle to reconcile the two realms -- and a fixation with one will elevate it to a position of dominance, leaving an unbalanced view of the whole -- a responsible scholar will resist the urge to do so through the exclusion of the other. In my humble opinion.

At any rate, to those who find Hawking's remarks disparaging, remember that beyond his superior intellect, he is simply a man, and the only singularity that really counts is within our transcendent human souls which are equal in their infinite potential. So take a huge grain of salt and go crank up some music! :)

:goodpost: BBMed above my favorite points of yours.

great post, bessie. Here, here! :applause: esp. on getting your spiritual counsel from spiritual scholars rather than scientists. Excellent point.

I believe that Hawking's argument is not with God or the idea of God or with persons of faith specifically. Hawking is intellectual enough (and scientifically aware enough) to realize that he can only present his findings for others to study and critique.

But for him, personally, yes, science may win points over faith - and - so what if it does? It's his learned and studied opinion, and he's leaving us with his research so we can continue to study and/or challenge it ... and that is about that.

IMO, I don't think that Hawking has any intent to argue, insult, or change the hearts of people of faith either... "fairy tale" definition = something magical, improbably and leading up to a happy ending. After all, heaven is rather like a happy ending, that we have no "proof" of - yet, we choose to have faith in the bible stories that tell us that heaven is our reward after life on earth.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fairy+tale


But I do think Hawking is arguing with scientists before him (e.g. Newton), and those who shall come after (who will no doubt enjoy long research careers taking issues with an poking holes in his Big Bang Theory and all of Hawking's life's works.) Scientists are quiet pesky about attacking each other like that. ;) :innocent: ... They aren't just gonna take Hawking's word for it. :no:

Those who fear Hawking is speaking directly against persons of faith, should remember that Hawking presents to secular audiences that come to hear him speak because they are interested in his theories. Hawking is not speaking in anyone's church nor is he attempting to unbaptize his listeners.

IMO, the faith argument is not with Hawking so much as it is with science. Unfortunate, science has no argument with matters of spirituality (that I know of...)...and science's goal is not to disprove God, but rather to attempt through scientific means to explain the world and how it works.

If Hawking (or any scientist) let spiritual beliefs color scientific work - as I mentioned - a next-gen scientist will be right along to critique that flaw.

Never-the-less, we all do well to attempt to slog through The Grand Design (a provocative book name, to be sure), and then we'll really know what adventures have led Hawking to his conclusions. :)

The Grand Design, which the publishers call Hawking's first major work in nearly a decade, challenges Isaac Newton's theory God must have been involved in creation because our solar system couldn't have come out of chaos simply through nature.

IMO, (regardless) To say God is not necessary for creation (as Hawking posits in his theories that all we need is gravity for spontaneous life to begin) is NOT the same as to say there is no God.

http://content.usatoday.com/communi...9/stephen-hawking-god-creation-grand-design/1

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/st...ry-story-majority-americans/story?id=13611922

In a 2010 interview with ABC News' Diane Sawyer, when asked if there was a way to reconcile religion and science, he said, "There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, [and] science, which is based on observation and reason. Science will win because it works."

And that there is Hawking's observation, and reasoned scientific opinion.
Perhaps someone should put a :cow: button on his speaker machine.

:cow:
 
  • #89
I wasn't offended by Stephen Hawking's statement about his disbelief in an afterlife, nor am I offended by anyone's expression of their personal spiritual beliefs (or lack thereof).

I'm confident enough in my own spiritual path not to feel threatened when someone else follows a dissimilar path.

As long as I am treated with respect and my innate freedom to discover my own truth is not impeded, I am content.

As sentient beings, we all have eyes with which to see, ears with which to hear, feet by which we walk, and the gift of free will to choose the road upon which we travel.

Life is a grand adventure.

IMO, the most important concept is this: Harm none.

Love this thread and love this post!
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
1,339
Total visitors
1,481

Forum statistics

Threads
635,595
Messages
18,680,223
Members
243,319
Latest member
space_dinos
Back
Top