LOL ot, for me it's "would of" and "should of" JMO
HA!! I hate that too!! And it's a "mute" point. Really?? :crazy:
I'm really hating that people can't even tweet from inside the courtroom. The suspense is killing me.
LOL ot, for me it's "would of" and "should of" JMO
Maybe all of their celebrity supporters and other fans will take care of that. Charity events, bake sales, etc.
Would you agree to that if you were in prison all these years and knew you were totally innocent? I'd want to get compensated and big time too. Not just a here you go....sign this and you're on your way but by signing this you have to admit guilt to the crime. HUH???? Makes absolutely no sense to me.
hmmmm...is she in the courtroom?? Disregarding the judges order of no tweeting? Oh well, she's a celebrity....nevermind...
They are aware of the case, and monitor it, but the Innocence Project only gets involved when someone has no other means of defense. These three have had a support group for longer than the Innocence Project has even existed so they've never needed their help.
I think they did file an Amicus brief with the ASSC to protest against Judge Burnett's interpretation of the DNA statute though.
Someone posted there is no compensation there. I think they know they will never get a statement of innocence, and know this is the best they will ever get. JMO. Should they sit and rot in jail waiting for something they know will never come? IMO, no.
They were convicted not just accused. Young and stupid is no excuse to murder.
That's not what I said.
HA!! I hate that too!! And it's a "mute" point. Really?? :crazy:
I'm really hating that people can't even tweet from inside the courtroom. The suspense is killing me.
I'm really surprised more people here at WS aren't following this...
Can I post tweet? if not please delete and I apologize: dgoins David Goins
RT @1NatalieMaines: All 3 boys will be set free 2day: will plead guilty as a technicality so they cant sue.
I am to!!