- Joined
- Aug 8, 2010
- Messages
- 5,230
- Reaction score
- 25,212
While I applaud their change of heart, this makes it clear that their earlier decision had nothing to do with accusations of misuse of funds against PP.
While I applaud their change of heart, this makes it clear that their earlier decision had nothing to do with accusations of misuse of funds against PP.
The statement left some ambiguity, however, because it did not mention a second reason Komen has given for ending Planned Parenthood’s funding: that the group did not provide direct mammogram services but instead referred patients to other providers.
....
Komen founder Nancy Brinker said the organization wants to support groups that directly provide breast health services, such as mammograms. She noted that Planned Parenthood was providing only mammogram referrals.
I wonder how much damage this has done to SGK an how many women will not be getting cancer screens because the liberal media caused a stink over a $700,000 grant being pulled from a corrupt agency.
Way to go!!!
Excuse me?
Who's fault is it? :lol:
Seriously, that's funny. And yet, so sad to think anyone would think that Komen itself does not bear the responsibility for this huge mis-step & backlash.
I agree it will be interesting to see if Komen can recover from this.
Personally, I hope they change things up under all this intense scrutiny, and become an even stronger, more focused and apolitical institution in this fight against cancer .
A charity should be able to pull a grant for any reason.
Who's fault is it?
1) liberal media
2) uninformed people who think PP is some sort of saving grace and overlook the corruption
A charity should be able to pull a grant for any reason.
Who's fault is it?
1) liberal media
2) uninformed people who think PP is some sort of saving grace and overlook the corruption
And...
3) people who don't understand that if SGK does not receive donations, over 700,000 women who need mammograms will not get them each year. All because of a $700,000 grant being pulled.
Simple math. It makes NO SENSE!
---
Yes, it really is unclear. The Komen Foundation needs to state unequivocally that it will continue its long practice of working with Planned Parenthood; otherwise, this looks like nothing more than an attempt to try to change the narrative and the non-stop negative headlines about the foundation's politicizing of breast cancer prevention.
---
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...nding-policy/2012/02/03/gIQAVRa3mQ_story.html
Yeah, clear that up, please. B/C planned parenthood clients won't go the clinic that gives free mammograms if the PP clinic appt that makes those referrals don't happen. It seems to me, for the women it services for women's health care, the PP gyn appointment has to happen, has to be funded, for the discussion/education about breast health and the free mammogram referral to happen. :waitasec:
A charity should be able to pull a grant for any reason.
Who's fault is it?
1) liberal media
2) uninformed people who think PP is some sort of saving grace and overlook the corruption
Why the heck wouldn't people donate to Komen?
On the wishful thinking that PP is corrupt?
Or on the belief that Komen has become politicized and that that is not proper?
Maybe both?
That's not simple math. That's political capital that you're mathing there. IMO.
Are you calling me uninformed people? LOL.
Okay so ... Komen can turn away PP's grant applications next year and provide a real explanation of why.
No harm, no foul. But I guess we'll just have to wait to see what Komen really believes is the problem with providing grants to PP...
As one who has worked in the nonprofit and grants world for many years, NO --a foundation CANNOT pull a grant for any reason. The majority of grants (especially one of this size) have a contract which both parties sign. Unless the grantee has violated the contract (which it doesn't seem that PP could have done as they are currently under a contract).
Liberal media and uninformed people?? I'll just say that I'm glad the "informed people" are in the minority in this matter.![]()