Yes.
"People asked me how he died," Millard says. "I'd say he died of a sudden bleed in his brain, which is what the coroner told me."
He'd just omit the part about the bullet that caused the bleed.
This has a familiar ring:
When he got out of the car, he saw more than a dozen people plainclothes officers with protective vests pointing guns at him.
"I was in shock," he says. "I can't pinpoint the feelings. It was another world."
"Shock" because he was certain he'd convinced the investigators during the "almost friendly" meeting two hours earlier? He's not the first perp to make that error in judgment.
JMO
Personally, I would think shock would be the natural reaction to that situation if someone was innocent. I also don't think it is very unusual to want to hide a suicide in the family due to the shame that often surrounds the act. And I don't think that either of those facts are enough to say decisively that someone is guilty or innocent.
I do believe he is self absorbed and wants to be loved and adored for throwing his money around towards his friends. What he wears or clothing he owns is irrelevant, even though he makes sure to mention his "clothing style" in the interview.Weird, considering his friends also mention how he dresses in their statements about him (he looked like a hillbilly, etc).
I don't know what part of the interview gives the impression that he is self absorbed (it is an interview of him about him, having him talk about irrelevant things would have been odd, I think). He admitted he used his money to throw impressive parties for his friends, but I don't think that is too odd when you have that amount of money. I have seen some ridiculously lavish parties for no apparent reason, but I don't judge those people for having the ability to host great parties; no matter the budget, I think all hosts try to make their guests feel like their expectations are being met, in my experience.
I think if his clothing style were that irrelevant, it wouldn't be discussed in places like this

What I really think, now that you bring it up, is that the people who knew him in school who called him a hillbilly were most likely not his friends, and could have actually been the reason that DM's parents agreed to let him continue his education from home. Most alternative schools are filled with children who didn't fit in at their 'normal' schools, and were often bullied for it at some point in their education.
But in all, I think it was refreshing to hear him explain himself in his own words. I think a lot of us here have wanted to hear something from him, some admission or denial, and I think it is understandable that he can't talk about the case, especially to give his alibi, in my opinion. I imagine that the publication ban extends to him discussing certain aspects of the case as well, and we don't know if he said more but it was edited out due to the ban.