mysteriew
A diamond in process
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2004
- Messages
- 23,813
- Reaction score
- 923
Peterson to wait for possessions
Schoenstedt did not rule Friday and set another hearing on the issue for Feb. 27, but allowed Brodsky to call a forensics scientist to testify.
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/peterson/773683,JO02_PETERSON_WEB.article
IMO the judge should order them held at least until after the Grand Jury investigation is complete.
I have been thinking about this. I have known victims bodies that were held for months, before being released so that family could bury them. I have known of stolen possessions that were held for months so they could be used as evidence in a trial. Yet because he is a suspect, HE has rights to HIS (their) possessions?!
And that brings me to a question. At least one of the vehicles was Stacy's, I wonder if it was in her name? Why should he have a right to it?
Schoenstedt did not rule Friday and set another hearing on the issue for Feb. 27, but allowed Brodsky to call a forensics scientist to testify.
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/peterson/773683,JO02_PETERSON_WEB.article
IMO the judge should order them held at least until after the Grand Jury investigation is complete.
I have been thinking about this. I have known victims bodies that were held for months, before being released so that family could bury them. I have known of stolen possessions that were held for months so they could be used as evidence in a trial. Yet because he is a suspect, HE has rights to HIS (their) possessions?!
And that brings me to a question. At least one of the vehicles was Stacy's, I wonder if it was in her name? Why should he have a right to it?